I never dreamed that my little corner of Alabama would be touched by corrupt Bushies; I figured they would be content to go after big timers like former Governor Don Siegelman and former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy.
But I was wrong about that, and in May 2008, I was fired from my job as an editor in the Publications Office at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB).
A mountain of evidence suggests my firing was a "political hit," and Horton closes out 2008 by spotlighting my termination on his No Comment blog at harpers.org. UAB's handling of my case, compared to its handling of some legitimate violations of the university's Acceptable Use Policy, is right out of George Orwell, Horton notes:
We could hardly end 2008 without delivering a George Orwell Honorable Mention to the University of Alabama at Birmingham for its truly extraordinary “acceptable use” policy on employee Internet use. There’s nothing strange about the language of the policy–in fact it’s pedestrian (the Internet “may not be used for any activity which is destructive, disruptive, or illegal” it says). But how the university interprets and applies this prohibition might surprise an observer–unless, of course, the observer is attuned to the peculiarities of Alabama politics.
Horton expertly puts UAB's actions into perspective, taking special delight in noting that the university expressed concern that I had actually read Harper's to help keep up with Alabama-related events:
Case in point: The university recently fired Roger Shuler, a long-time public relations employee who blogs on legal developments under the moniker “the Legal Schnauzer,” apparently expressing concern in a grievance hearing over the fact that he regularly visited and read Harper’s. After The Chronicle of Higher Education reported on the firing, the university posted a credibility-straining assertion that the firing was “based solely on work performance.” Also according to the Chronicle:
The university told The Raw Story that Mr. Shuler had not been fired for blogging, but it would not comment further. In June an appeals committee at the university voted to overturn Mr. Shuler’s dismissal. But he says the university recently told him that, while he could be rehired, he would not get his former job back.
Horton then dives into the "Rest of the Story" version of my firing, focusing on the numerous threatening anonymous e-mails I had received--including one specifically stating an intention to go after my job:
Shuler says that the decision to fire him was based on the political content of his blog posts, which were critical of Alabama Governor Bob Riley and one of his key allies, U.S. Attorney Alice Martin. According to Shuler, the firing occurred only a few months after one of Riley’s political cronies threatened him with the loss of his job because of his blogging. Indeed, to the university’s chagrin, his final review session was taped, and portions which have now been published suggest that the primary concern of his reviewers was that he was publicly critical of the state’s political powers.
Horton provides more details about Alice Martin's curious denials regarding my firing:
Martin’s office, according to a report from Raw Story, denied that “her office was in any way involved with Shuler’s termination. ‘There has been no contact by the office to Mr Shuler’s employer,’ she wrote.” So what led to the firing? That apparently will be for a court to determine. In the meantime it’s worth noting some other cases of Internet abuse at the university to see how they were handled.
Yes, indeed, UAB recently has dealt with at least two cases where its computer/Internet use policy actually was violated. One involved anti-gay comments sent from a UAB computer to a California-based gay-rights organization. Another involves a vile and racist e-mail that appears to have been sent from a UAB computer. It includes crude and profane references to President-Elect Barack Obama. So how did UAB handle those? Horton clues us in:
Apparently the university actually is prepared to be liberal about Internet use–as long as that use isn’t in “liberal” interests. Huntsville CBS affiliate WHNT recently broadcast a study of the university’s bizarre double standard. One university employee recently used her work account to pen this note to the leaders of an Anti-Proposition 8 group in California: “You freaks make me sick. You are the scourge of the earth and are responsible for everything that’s wrong in this sorry world because of the immorality you have brought on the world as a whole.” The university’s response to the use of its facilities to transmit this hate mail? According to WHNT, they won’t say more than that they did “follow up appropriately as outlined by UAB’s Acceptable Use Policy”; there is no evidence of whether any disciplinary action was taken. WHNT’s Greg Privett also noted a widely circulated ditty coming from the university’s pediatrics office. It starts “Wuz the night befo Crizzmus” and it proceeds to ridicule President-Elect Obama in overtly racist tones. Surely this violates the university’s “acceptable use” policy?
This all might seem hopelessly bizarre for folks who live in areas where rational thought prevails. But Horton notes it fits right in with the strange terrain of Alabama:
It seems that in Birmingham one type of “political speech” is protected and can be freely spread using the university’s servers while another is not–even when the employee is expressing it on private time and his own computer. George Orwell would understand.
I find Martins denial disturbing. She mentions that there has been no contact by the office, but that doesn't tell us what happened out of the office, or after hours and doesn't sound like a complete denial. Language does matter and hers appears calculated, although some of their calculations in your state have been egregious. And it's obvious that racism still lives in Alabama. I thought we stamped out that demon from them 40 years ago, but it seems to still be around. Some of those folks are never going to learn until the Federal Government gives them a hard spanking. Keep your head up Roger, help is on the way I'm sure.
And for the edification of the many folks who read your blog, Orwell was a strong critic of the Soviet Union, so much so that his books were taught in American schools throughout the cold war. And Orwell was an avowed and devoted socialist. The folks in Alabama will never get why that is so unless they read one of Orwell's classics about the fight against the Fascist leader Franco, in Spain, where Orwell went to fight fascism and fired real guns with real bullets and was shot at and was shot in the throat and was almost killed in the process, but fortunately for us, the bullet passed through cleanly without hitting a major artery or the spine and he didn't die. The book about the fight against fascism is called Homage to Catalonia. Seems like some of the folks in Alabama don't understand fascism when they see it or engage in it. This matter and the Siegelman case are good examples of fascism in action. Keep your head up Roger, it's going to turn out just fine. There are many people on your side.
Thanks for your supportive and informative post. You taught me a lot about Orwell.
Another interesting aspect of Martin's "denial." My understanding is that Raw Story's Lindsay Beyerstein tried to interview Martin several times for the story. Martin refused, but waited until the last minute to issue a "statement." In other words she took no questions on the subject.
UAB officials did the same thing.
As you say, the mere "fact" that no one from her office contacted my employer, doesn't mean Martin wasn't involved. And it doesn't mean that some of Martin's GOP cohorts, perhaps at her direction, contacted UAB or the UA Board of Trustees.
UAB was my employer, but the campus is run by the UA Board of Trustees. That means someone might not have contacted my employer directly, but went through the board to get me fired.
We know that Martin lied under oath in the Deirdra Brown Fleming case, so you can't believe much of anything she says.
Also, we know that Martin helped UAB pretty much get away with massive research fraud, and I'm going to be posting about that in detail soon.
When UAB's house of cards collapses you're buying the beer!
Simon is right. Lots of people supporting you and on your side.
Stay strong! You will be vindicated and get your position back and those who persecuted you will be looking for work.
The writings on the wall.
Post a Comment