Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Victim in Epstein files provided credible accusations that Donald Trump had sexually assaulted her, while Maria Farmer twice warned the FBI about Trump


Maria Farmer: She warned FBI about Trump (Yahoo!)


Newly discovered details in the Epstein files show that a victim in the sex-trafficking scandal told the FBI Donald Trump had sexually assaulted her -- undercutting claims by the White House, most recently stated by Attorney General Pam Bondi, that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) had no such evidence as of last week. That's from a report by Roger Sollenberger, a highly regarded independent journalist who has worked at The Daily Beast and Salon and had his free-lance articles published at BuzzFeed News, WIRED, the New Republic, and VICE, among others. 

His latest piece is published at Substack, under the headline "FBI interviewed Trump accuser, Epstein files show; Trump was credibly accused of sexual assault. It's unclear what became of the DOJ's investigation." Sollenberger writes:

The FBI spoke to a victim of Jeffrey Epstein who also accused Donald Trump of sexually and violently assaulting her, according to records in the Justice Department’s publicly searchable Epstein database.

The records don’t show what became of the DOJ’s investigation into the allegations, but the documents indicate the government found her to be a credible accuser. Records elsewhere in the files reveal that a woman with matching biographical details sued Epstein’s estate and won a settlement in 2021.

The allegations and FBI interview are landmark revelations, undermining the White House’s protestations that Trump hasn’t been accused of wrongdoing and showing instead that the U.S. government has been aware of a credible Trump accuser in the Epstein files.

Not all of the documents the DOJ released on Jan. 30 have been widely seen as credible. As a report at Occupy Democrats stated:

Within the huge tranche of millions of Epstein files are dozens upon dozens of accusations against Donald Trump, but many of them are from FBI tip lines and aren’t considered to be very credible.

However, buried within the pages is a report from the FBI that shows the government found [a woman] to be a credible accuser — and her story from the late 1980s is deeply disturbing. 

Roger Sollenberger provides details showing why the latest records to surface are both disturbing and credible. He writes:

The DOJ included the woman’s allegation in a comprehensive 21-page internal slideshow presentation about the government’s investigations into Epstein and convicted co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, well as in an internal email chain collecting information for the presentation. Her accusation is one of two about Trump that the FBI’s child sex trafficking and violent crimes task forces noted on the slide, which listed a number of then-nonpublic accusations involving prominent figures.

“[REDACTED] stated Epstein introduced her to Trump who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit,” the presentation says. “In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out.” The victim would have been “approximately 13-15 years old when this occurred,” according to the presentation. The alleged assault took place in the early-mid 1980s, and the same woman also claimed to be an Epstein victim.

One claim is particularly powerful -- and credible -- because it comes from a government witness whose testimony under oath helped convict Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell. Sollenberger writes:

The second Trump claim on the slide — that Epstein introduced a victim to Trump when she was 14 years old, saying, “This is a good one, right?” to which Trump agreed — carries immense credibility within the DOJ: That claim, about an incident at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in 1994, came from a key government witness whose testimony at trial helped DOJ prosecutors convict Maxwell, the files reveal.

Both the presentation and the email chain were created last summer, around the time Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche interviewed Maxwell for an anachronistic jailhouse proffer.

At first viewing, the assault allegation against Trump appeared to have limited value. But a closer look indicated several reasons the Trump claim stood out. Sollenberger dives into those reasons:

The assault allegation initially came via a lead called into an FBI hotline, according to internal records about the hotline tips. The Trump accusation sits at the top of that list, which also contains salacious, unverified, and often bizarre accusations against Trump. The notes show the FBI followed up on the tip, learning the victim’s identity from the caller and preparing to dispatch agents to the “Washington Office” for an interview.

But the slideshow presentation and the internal emails last summer don’t cite the hotline as the source for the tip, as they do for a tip about Bill Barr. Instead, both cite the victim herself as the source of the claim, showing the FBI spoke directly with the Trump accuser. (Elsewhere on the slide, a claim about former President Bill Clinton is attributed to someone specified as “not a victim.”)

While it’s not clear what became of the investigation into the Trump claim, details from the tip match other records in the files, including an FBI write-up (known as a “302” form) of an interview with an Epstein victim and her lawyer. The interview was conducted July 24, 2019, and entered into the FBI’s case files on August 9, the day before Epstein was found dead in his jail cell.

A statement from the lawyer indicated his client had been the target of Trump's violence once, causing her to fear being targeted again. From the Sollenberger report:

Later in the interview, the woman discussed a photo of Epstein and Trump that someone had sent her, which was still saved in her phone. The victim asked the agents if she could crop someone out of the picture — Donald Trump. When the FBI agents asked if she could explain why she wanted to crop Trump out, the woman hesitated, and her attorney answered, saying “[REDACTED] was concerned about implicating additional individuals, and specifically any that were well known, due to fear of retaliation,” the 302 says.

”Of note, the particular image sent to her was recognized by Agents as a widely distributed photograph of JEFFREY EPSTEIN and current United States President DONALD TRUMP,” the 302 says.

Epstein database searches for this victim’s case number — 3501.045 — turn up other affiliated documents, including a July 19, 2019, memo showing the FBI’s Seattle, Washington, field office handled the interview.

The victim's allegations against Epstein and Trump have only been known to the public for two days. But the encounters go back roughly 45 years, and the abuse she experienced goes beyond the two most famous names associated with the case. Sollenberger provides an explanatory timeline:

The woman’s Epstein “victimization occurred in the 1980’s when the caller was approximately 13 to 15 years old and resided in the [REDACTED] Island area of South Carolina. The reported victim provided enough preliminary information to warrant a follow-up interview,” the memo says.

Those biographical details match the initial tip, which notes a criminal history in South Carolina. They also match public reporting about a South Carolina victim relocated to Vancouver, WA — close to Seattle — who filed a lawsuit against Epstein, receiving a settlement from his estate in 2021.

According to reports about the lawsuit, the victim claimed she had also been assaulted and raped by “other prominent, wealthy men” she met in other states, most specifically when Epstein took her to “intimate gatherings” in New York City. The alleged sexual and violent assault at Trump’s hands took place in New Jersey, according to FBI notes.

The woman’s reported settlement with the Epstein estate came despite a seeming paucity of hard evidence to support her claims. The 302 notes that the victim said she “never would have written down what happened to her,” only told two people about the abuse — one of whom, her mother, had passed away — and “did not keep a formal diary, and she did not make any recordings of any kind regarding the incidents.

There’s also a seeming paucity of information about this victim in the Epstein files. Searches for the victim’s case number pull up some records — including the cropped photo of Epstein mentioned in the 302 — but some gaps appear in the FBI’s ordinal record-keeping of the files.

A master Epstein evidence manifest shows the government “acquired” at least four pieces of evidence in late February and March of last year—around the time the DOJ was conducting its initial all-hands review of Epstein records, and around the time the DOJ was returning to Trump troves of sensitive government documents he took with him to Mar-a-Lago upon leaving office in 2021.

I’ve reached out to a DOJ spokesperson for comment, and will update this piece with any response.

What are the chances that these latest revelations will, finally, cause accountability to land at Trump's doorstep. A reasonable American -- having seen a string of government entities, from the U.S. Supreme Court, to the DOJ, on down, provide Trump with favorable treatment -- might conclude there is a "fat chance" of the president ever being held accountable. But Sollenberger does not seem so sure about that:

So far, Trump — thanks in part to false statements, misdirection, public confusion, and excessive redactions from his own DOJ — has evaded the crosshairs of credible allegations in the Epstein files.

However, this claim would contradict the narrative that the sitting president has not been credibly accused of wrongdoing in the Epstein saga. . . .

A separate internal DOJ email about allegations involving Maxwell victims and prominent figures dated around the same time — July 22, 2025, days before Blanche’s jailhouse interview — includes this allegation, noting the victim “testified at trial.” The encounter occurred at Trump’s resort compound at Mar-a-Lago when the victim was 14 or 15 years old, the email states. That matches a claim in handwritten notes from 2019, where the victim recounts over several pages her traumatic history with Epstein and Maxwell. The encounter with Trump occurred around 1994-1995, the notes say.

“This is my friend [REDACTED],” the notes say about what Epstein said at the time. “Think he said friend.”

With the help of allies in Congress and the media, Trump has bulled through dozens of allegations of sexual misconduct, emerging with little political damage. But the courts have delivered significant verdicts against him: In 2023 and 2024, juries in New York found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll, awarding her a total of $88.3 million, then convicted him on 34 felony counts for fraudulently disguising payments to buy the silence of adult film star Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 election, weeks after leaked Access Hollywood footage revealed Trump bragging in 2005 about grabbing  women “by the pussy” without fear of consequences.

Annie Farmer, the only one of four main accusers against Ghislaine Maxwell to testify under her real name, has not said she directly was a victim of assault by Trump. . . . But she does meaningfully undermine one of the president’s central defenses — that despite years of close friendship and socializing, Trump had not been aware that Epstein preyed on underage girls and cut ties with him once he did learn about it.

Maria Farmer, an Epstein and Maxwell victim and the sister of Annie Farmer, another key witness against Maxwell, says she told the FBI twice to look into the now-dead predator’s ties to the president, in 2006 and 1996.

The claim adds to a growing pile of information challenging what Trump knew about his dead friend’s history of abusing and raping young women, and when he knew it. That evidence includes a lewd birthday card Trump sent Epstein in 2003, the long and deeply reported history of their socializing in the 1980s and '90s, a fully redacted email between Epstein and Maxwell discussing Epstein and Trump’s relationship, and an FBI interview with Palm Beach chief of police Michael Reiter, who said Trump told him in a 2006 phone call that Epstein’s disgusting behavior was widely known and Maxwell was “evil.”

Asked about that call last week, the White House wouldn’t confirm or deny that it occurred.

“Thank goodness you’re stopping him, everyone has known he’s been doing this,” Reiter recalled Trump saying. The chief also recalled Trump claiming he’d once encountered Epstein around a group of teenagers and “got the hell out of there.”

Monday, February 16, 2026

Tipster alleges in FBI document that girls were murdered, buried at Trump golf courses -- with Trump funding "underage sex parties" on his properties

Trump National Golf Club Bedminister (Golf Digest)

A tipster alleges in an FBI document that a body connected to the Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking network is buried at one of Donald Trump's golf courses. The tipster also claimed to have witnessed British television host Robin Leach strangle a girl during a sex party at a Trump golf course/resort.

In all, the FBI document includes allegations that girls were murdered on three separate occasions, with their bodies being disposed of on Trump property.

This is not the first time rumors have swirled of orgies, missing girls, and possible murders at Trump-owned facilities. But the latest allegations -- in the form of a tip to the FBI, with news reporting at Raw Story -- appear to provide the most solid information to surface so far of deeply alarming events that seem connected to the Epstein network and Trump facilities.

Under the headline 'Buried at the Trump Golf Course: Explosive FBI Interview unearthed in Epstein Files,"  Raw Story's Alexander Willis writes:

An explosive allegation against President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein has surfaced in the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) recent release of 3.5 million files, including disturbing details about a body allegedly buried at one of Trump’s more than a dozen golf courses.

According to an FBI document released by the DOJ, the agency received a tip in June of 2021 from an individual whose name has been redacted, but is described as an alleged “victim,” a former member of the Sinaloa Cartel, and a close confidant of Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

The individual was formally interviewed by an FBI agent, and accused Trump of being aware of and having funded “underage sex parties at the Donald Trump golf course.”

The new FBI information raises a host of questions, with the subject matter becoming extremely dark. Let's consider the following:

* Did Trump and Epstein collude in hosting sex parties involving adults and underage girls, perhaps joining forces to dispose of victims they felt had seen too much and might be inclined to talk?

* What does it mean when the tipster claims to be aware of Trump "having funded underage sex parties" at one of his golf courses? U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) has been conducting a "follow the money" probe for roughly four years, focusing on finances surrounding the Epstein network. Could Trump be connected to dubious financial transactions that benefited Epstein?

* Wyden has slammed the DOJ for its failure to properly investigate the Epstein network and its financing. He has gone so far as to lay out a trail -- featuring seven lines of inquiry -- for investigators to follow. Is a DOJ led by Trump sycophant Pam Bondi only going to obstruct any efforts to get at the truth? Would a Republican-controlled Congress be able and willing to lead an investigative effort?

* Do excavation procedures need to be launched at Trump golf courses, searching for signs of buried bodies? Should Trump and his allies be called to testify under oath about such procedures and possible financing of the Epstein network?

Speaking of investigations, the tipster provided his/her own lines of inquiry, according to the Raw Story report:

The individual went on to claim that they had “recordings of Trump, Epstein and Maxwell discussing marketing strategies for high profile sex parties,” according to the FBI official who drafted the document, their name also redacted. The individual claimed that in one of the recordings, Trump can be heard stating “he was aware of the underage sex parties.”

The tipster also told the FBI agent that they had personally witnessed Robin Leach – the British entertainment reporter and television host best known for “Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous” – “strangle a young girl during a sex party” at one of Trump’s golf courses or resorts.

“[They] claim she is buried behind the 19th hole at the Donald Trump Golf Course,” the report reads.

(Note: Golf courses generally have only 18 holes, so a reference to a "19th hole" is puzzling. Bars, lounges, and similar facilities where golfers socialize after their rounds have been known to be tagged with such names as "The 19th hole."  could the reference be to such a gathering place and not a golf hole that actually is playable?) Here are more details from Raw Story's Alexander Willis:

“[Redacted] is aware of three separate occasions in which girls were murdered and buried there. [Redacted] was told if [they] spoke about the incident [they] witnessed, [they] would end up in the hole as well.”

Due to the sheer volume of Epstein-related materials released by the DOJ, many of the documents contain unverified, uncorroborated allegations that do not constitute evidence, and do not establish wrongdoing. Trump is not facing any criminal charges or investigations related to the allegation.

Friday, February 13, 2026

Pam Bondi's refusal to even acknowledge the presence of Epstein victims shows she is all about loyalty to Trump -- with no interest in truth, justice, or grace





For all the fire and fury from Pam Bondi's testimony before the House Judiciary Committee this week, it all boiled down to one clear revelation: The U.S. attorney general has zero interest in the concepts that are supposed to be at the heart of her job. That is the conclusion of MS NOW's (formerly MSNBC) Michael Steele, a former lieutenant governor of Maryland and a former chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC). Under the headline "Pam Bondi's testimony on the Epstein files revealed one key thing: The attorney general isn't interested in truth or justice," Steele writes:

If Pam Bondi’s goal when testifying before Congress on Wednesday was to put to rest the controversy over her department’s mishandling of the Epstein files, she failed badly.

But if the attorney general just wanted to impress Donald Trump, she probably succeeded.

In more than five hours of testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Bondi defended the president, personally insulted lawmakers and literally kept her back turned on survivors of Epstein’s abuse.

But here’s the thing: The attorney general is not the president’s personal consigliere, and the Department of Justice is not his personal law firm. Bondi works for the American people, and that role carries a fundamental obligation: to pursue justice.

In this case, that would mean finding out the full truth about what happened to the girls and young women who were trafficked on Epstein’s island and the powerful men who participated in his depredations.

Instead, Bondi repeatedly criticized the administrations of Joe Biden and prior presidents for their handling of Epstein. She accused Democrats of focusing on the files to distract from Trump’s criminal justice agenda and in one bizarre instance even cited the performance of the stock market to defend the president.

-----------------------------------

Legal Schnauzer's take:

The disrespect Bondi showed toward the survivors is a takeaway decent Americans should keep in their hearts as the 2026 mid-term elections draw near. Not only did Bondi show she has neither the temperament, intellect, nor integrity to hold any public position -- after all, she was the Florida AG who did nothing to hold Epstein accountable to begin with -- she proved she is an empty show dog for the dysfunctional postmodern Republican Party, the one that is taking apart our rule of law piece by piece. (A video, from USA TODAY, of Bondi refusing Pramila Jayapal's request that she turn and apologize to Epstein victims behind her can be viewed at the top of this post.)

The GOP's first mistake regarding Trump's nomination of Bondi as U.S. attorney general was its utter failure to conduct a serious investigation of her background and credentials. Bondi was confirmed in the Senate by a vote of 54-46, with every Republican (and Democrat John Fetterman) voting in favor. That was a gross capitulation of the Senate's oversight authority, a trend that has continued to this day in the Trump II era. The Senate's failure is particularly galling because there was no shortage of evidence that Bondi was going to be a puppet for Trump. Our coverage here at Legal Schnauzer, dating to 2016, addressed those issues. (See here, here, here, and here.) 

----------------------------------

More from Legal Schnauzer:

In short, a one-man blog -- based in Alabama at the time -- could see the Trump-Bondi relationship showed signs of being pock-marked with corruption and could spell big trouble for justice in the U.S. So why couldn't Republicans see it -- and why couldn't other everyday Americans see it? (Note; In my view, GOPers and their MAGA brethren didn't want to see it. I think many regular Americans did see it. But count me among the folks who are not convinced the 2024 election was fairly and lawfully conducted. With Elon Musk paying voters in Pennsylvania (and other states), and with Musk's ties to Russia, voting technology, and mountains of cash, there are ample reasons to suspect the election was the product of fraud -- meaning Trump is not now the lawful president of the United States. 

We have written extensively about a Pennsylvania-based election-security expert and technology developer named Stephen Spoonamore, who has done his best to show that the  2024 presidential election featured signs of being hacked, and Kamala Harris likely was the real winner. But Harris, for reasons that baffle me, has proven unwilling to help unearth the truth, so we are left with the madness and horror of Trump II -- and his detestable attorney general.

-----------------------------------------

Speaking of Pam Bondi, let's return to Michael Steele and his thoughts on her testimony before Congress this week. From MS NOW:

More from Michael Steele: 

At one point, Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal asked Epstein survivors seated in the hearing room to stand and raise their hands if they had not yet met with the Justice Department. All 11 raised their hands.

Jayapal then asked Bondi to turn to the survivors and apologize. In the most appalling moment of the hearing, Bondi refused.

If there is justice in the world, the photograph of Bondi looking straight ahead as a row of women raises their hands behind her will haunt her for the rest of her career.

The exchanges grew sharper. When Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman asked whether Bondi would commit to publicly releasing an unredacted Epstein email so Americans could understand the extent of Trump’s relationship with Epstein, Bondi sidestepped and instead attacked Goldman's role in Trump’s first impeachment. At another point, she called Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin a “washed-up loser lawyer.”

Through it all, the central question persisted: What responsibility does the Justice Department have toward the victims of Jeffrey Epstein? 

---------------------------------------------------

More from Legal Schnauzer:

Steele's take on that question is a sad reflection of democracy's frail state in 2026. If the public does not revolt and demand elites get to the ugly, horrifying truth at the heart of the Epstein case,  the "Great American Experiment" likely will be over. It seems obvious at this point there will be no top-down solution to our current mess. That means we must have a bottom-up, grassroots effort -- but it isn't clear that will happen. It is clear, after this week's testimony, that Pam Bondi will do everything in her power to make sure that doesn't happen. Let's return to Michael Steele, as he takes a closer look at a penetrating question: What does the DOJ owe the Epstein victims, who Bondi treated so dismissively on Wednesday.

More from Michael Steele:

Bondi never truly engaged that question. She did not face the survivors. She did not apologize. She did not signal that their pain, their stories or their demand for transparency would guide the department’s next steps.

And that is what she revealed under oath.

She revealed a department more animated by partisan defense than by moral clarity. She revealed an instinct to protect power rather than pursue truth and justice. She revealed that, in this moment, loyalty appears to carry more weight than accountability.

The survivors were not abstractions. They were in the room. The files are not some historical documents. They are evidence of very recent crimes. And the questions are not political theater. They are demands for answers.

If the attorney general will not turn around and face the victims standing behind her, the American people must face what that means about the Trump administration.

The Epstein files are not going away. Neither is the demand for justice.

Thursday, February 12, 2026

Pam Bondi gets into a down-and-dirty rasslin' match with U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler and winds up again looking like Nixon-era Attorney General John Mitchell


Many of you probably are familiar with this adage: "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt." That pearl of wisdom often has been attributed to Abraham Lincoln or Mark Twain, and it sounds like something either man might have said. But our research indicates there is doubt that the saying originated with them. The Yale Book of Quotations (YBQ) appears to be the first source to credit Lincoln, but quoteinvestigator.com is reluctant to go with Lincoln or Twain, so we will have to leave the quote's origin up in the air. Either way, it's a classic -- short, filled with truth, humorous, and easy to remember.

The saying comes to mind after watching the appearance of U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi yesterday morning before the House Judiciary Committee.  In the days before Donald Trump,  such a setting usually called for at least a minimal level of dignity. But Bondi, who acts more as Trump's personal attorney rather than as "the people's lawyer," could not muster even the slightest hint of decorum. Instead, her appearance devolved into a shouting match when U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) dared to suggest she was conducting a cover-up related to the Epstein files. 

Based on Bondi's reaction, you would have thought one of those fake wrestling matches from yesteryear was about to commence -- the kind where the villain tended to wear a mask, from which he would extract a metal object and use it to draw blood above the brow of the hero. To maximum dramatic effect, the hero would regain his senses in the nick of time, with both wrestlers bouncing off the ropes only to violently meet in the middle of the ring, where the hero would land a well-timed elbow to the chest, allowing him to pin the bad guy as the crowd went into a frenzy. By the way, it's not that I've actually attended such an event; I've only heard others speak of them . . . (cough, hack, snort!)

We will go into a blow-by-blow account of the Bondi-Nadler grudge match -- and you can watch a video of the main event at the top of this post -- but I should note that Bondi's behavior was not a surprise to your humble blogger. Back when Legal Schnauzer was based in Alabama, we wrote a number of stories about Bondi's political dabblings, mainly because of her connections to an Alabama GOP operative named Jessica Medeiros Garrison and and the ties they both had to the Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA). Our reports mostly were in the 2016-2024 range and some included details about Bondi's relationship with one Donald J. Trump. (See here, here, here, and here.)

What about RAGA, and how did Bondi and Garrison figure into its sometimes sketchy activities? We have addressed those questions in a number of posts, most of them long before Bondi became a national figure. (See here, here, and here.) Why do we describe RAGA's activities as sketchy? Well, the organization somehow managed to attract the attention of investigators from The New York Times, which produced a series of articles that can be viewed at this link. The subjects of The Times reporting do not come off in a flattering light. (We will have more in upcoming posts on Pam Bondi, Jessica Medeiros Garrison, their ties to what appeared to be a shakedown operation, and how much of this connects to Donald Trump.)

For now, let's return to Bondi's contentious showdown with Jerrold Nadler, per a report from the Occupy Democrats Facebook page:

BREAKING: “You washed-up loser lawyer!” Pam Bondi throws a FURIOUS tantrum after Rep. Jerry Nadler confronts her on letting Epstein’s cronies walk free!
Attorney General Pam Bondi was called before the House Judiciary Committee this morning to face the music for orchestrating a cover-up of the Epstein files and protecting the powerful pedophiles whose identities are hidden within…and when confronted with the facts, she blew her top in a transparently Trumpian projection of guilt.

Nadler got right down to the point, and immediately made it clear that he wasn’t going to put up with her deflection shenanigans.

NADLER: “How many of Epstein's co-conspirators have you indicted? How many perpetrators are you even investigating?”
BONDI: First, you showed it. I find it—
NADLER: How many have you indicted?
BONDI: *angrily* Excuse me! I'm going to answer the question.  

NADLER: Answer my question
BONDI: No, I'm going to answer the question the way *I* want to answer the question.
NADLER: No, you're going to answer the question the way I asked it.
BONDI: Chairman Jordan, I'm not going to get in the gutter with these people, but I'm going to answer the question.
NADLER: How many have you indicted?
BONDI: I think it's very interesting. I think it's very interesting that he talks about they indicted— The president said they indicted him twice —
JAMIE RASKIN, INTERJECTING: Mr. Chairman, please stop the clock and restore his time.
BONDI: Oh, okay. Here we go with these theatrics!
RASKIN: You can let her filibuster all day long, but not on our watch. Not on our time. And I told you about that, Attorney General, before you started.
BONDI: YOU DON’T TELL ME ANYTHING YOU WASHED UP, LOSER — not even a lawyer.
NADLER: All right. My time. The answer to my question, how many of Epstein's co-conspirators has she indicted, is zero.

 

Occupy Democrats concludes: "Bondi and the rest of the Trump team have no explanation and no possible justification for what they’ve done and are continuing to do on behalf of powerful pedophiles — so bluster, bullying, and tantrums are all they have.
"What a disgraceful show by our nation’s most senior law enforcement officer. She must be impeached as soon as possible. and brought to justice — along with every single one of the pedophiles she's protecting."

In October 2025, a former Trump administration official compared Bondi to Nixon-era Attorney General John Mitchell -- and it was not in a favorable light, as this article from The Hill makes clear under the headline "Ty Cobb: Bondi more 'reprehensible' than Nixon attorney general:

Former White House attorney Ty Cobb, who served during President Trump’s first term, lambasted Attorney General Pam Bondi for her combative congressional testimony.

In an interview on CNN’s “Erin Burnett OutFront,” Cobb said Bondi’s tenure as the country’s chief law enforcement official has been more “reprehensible” than that of Nixon-era Attorney General John Mitchell, who was later convicted for his role in the Watergate scandal.

Asked if he had ever “seen something like that before,” referring to Bondi’s performance, Cobb said, “Never.”

“I think today she achieved one thing,” he continued. “She knocked John Mitchell off the perch of reprehensible attorney generals as No. 1, despite his guilty plea and time in jail.”

Bondi arrived armed with personal attacks against individual Democratic senators and lobbed them at her questioners when pressed on a range of topics.

She refused to divulge any discussions she’s had with the White House, including whether she and Trump have discussed the legal justification for National Guard deployments in Portland, Ore., and Chicago against local officials’ objections.

She also would not say who instructed the FBI to flag Trump’s name in the Epstein files, telling Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the committee’s ranking member, “I’m not going to discuss anything about that with you, senator.”

“Eventually, you’re going to have to answer for your conduct in this,” Durbin responded. “You won’t do it today, but eventually you will.”