Leaderboard 728 X 90

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Did Alabama Lawyer Jennifer Paige Clark Die Because She Refused To Sell Out Her Own Clients?

Jennifer Paige Clark

The Alabama State Bar harassed one of its member lawyers to death, probably because she refused to sell out her own clients, a Legal Schnauzer investigation shows.

The lawyer in question was Jennifer Paige Clark, who was found dead at her Mobile home last May 26, nine days after the state bar had suspended her license on charges that our research shows were unfounded. The clients were Ms. Clark's parents, Larry and Hilda Clark of Flowery Branch, Georgia.

At least three major oddities about the Jennifer Paige Clark case strongly suggest that bar officials knew they had no legitimate grounds for investigating her, much less imposing discipline. So why did they do it? It's almost certainly because Ms. Clark was doing exactly what lawyers are supposed to do--she was providing her clients with zealous representation, and certain judges did not welcome that.

Our investigation shows Ms. Clark uncovered facts that made powerful interests uncomfortable in two states. When politically connected judges could not force her off the trail, they apparently sicced the Alabama State Bar on her. The bar responded by charging Ms. Clark with rules violations that she clearly did not commit--and by conducting a disciplinary trial that, public documents show, make a kangaroo court look dignified by comparison.

What politically connected judges are we talking about? No. 1 on the list is Georgia Superior Court Judge Jason Deal, the son of the state's Republican governor, Nathan Deal. Public records suggest that Judge Deal did not appreciate an Alabama lawyer aggressively pursuing a case against a Georgia municipality and took steps to get Ms. Clark removed from the case. Did that include voicing his displeasure to the Alabama State Bar, leading to a baseless investigation? The answer appears to be yes. (See Judge Deal's order revoking Ms. Clark's admission to practice in Georgia, at the end of this post.)

Even the Alabama State Bar seemed to acknowledge that its original charges against Jennifer Paige Clark were bogus. How do we know? In suspending Ms. Clark's license and seeking her disbarment, the bar made almost no mention of the original charges. Rather, it cited Ms. Clark's conduct during the discipline hearing as the primary grounds for suspension.

Our review of the hearing transcript shows that Ms. Clark did not engage in inappropriate conduct--unless you consider it inappropriate to express irritation at being forced to defend yourself against trumped-up charges. Ms. Clark's main response was to repeatedly, and correctly, state that she could not violate attorney-client privilege by discussing inside information about the case. The Alabama State Bar decided such "misconduct" merited sanctions that essentially would ruin Ms. Clark's career.

Nine days after those sanctions were announced, Ms. Clark was found dead. An official cause of death still has not been announced.

Jennifer Paige Clark's story provides a tragic twist to one of many ugly truths in our dysfunctional justice system. As we have shown in several posts, your own attorney often can prove to be your worst enemy in any court battle. Why does this happen? We will provide more details in a moment, but here is the short answer: The outcomes of many legal battles, in both state and federal courts, have little to do with the relevant facts and law; rather, they often are decided by compromised judges who play favors for certain parties or attorneys.

Published reports indicate Jennifer Paige Clark did not play along with that game. Consider this section from Ms. Clark's obituary, featuring comments from Mobile County District Judge Charles N. McKnight:

Jennifer Clark could be "the sweetest person," according to Mobile County District Court Charles McKnight, and was well liked. "But get her in a courtroom and you could get something completely different,""said McKnight. "She was a very hard worker. She was tenacious to a fault. She vigorously represented all her clients regardless of their station in life. I admired her willingness to represent the lowest of the low."

If Jennifer Clark provided vigorous representation for "the lowest of the low," imagine how hard she would fight for her parents? Ms. Clark represented her parents in a pair of property-related cases, using aggressive discovery tactics--and documents in the cases indicate the Clarks uncovered misconduct involving powerful forces in two Southern locales.

One is Hall County, Georgia, which perhaps is best known to sports fans for hosting the Atlanta Falcons NFL training camp at Flowery Branch. Gainesville, the county seat, is where former Congressman and current Georgia Governor Nathan Deal built his political base.

The other hot spot is in Baldwin County, along Alabama's Gulf Coast and home to a burgeoning real-estate market where beachfront condominiums can yield massive profits for certain developers.

What about the three oddities that raise serious questions about the Alabama State Bar's motives and actions in the Jennifer Paige Clark case? Here they are:

* The Alabama State Bar initiated the investigation on its own--The bar can do this under Rule 3(c) of the Alabama Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. But I know from personal experience, and based on information provided by other citizens, that the state bar routinely declines to investigate cases where evidence of attorney wrongdoing is clear and irrefutable. That suggests it is rare for the bar to launch an investigation on its own.

* There was no client complaint against Jennifer Paige Clark--Our research indicates the vast majority of bar investigations are launched by a client complaint. But there was no such complaint against Ms. Clark; by all accounts, her parents were pleased with her representation.

* The investigation was launched based on information that Jennifer Paige Clark provided to the bar--You heard that correctly: The Alabama State Bar launched an investigation because of information that Ms. Clark herself sent to them. That strongly indicates Ms. Clark did not have a "guilty mindset." Would she have copied the bar on correspondence that she thought contained a violation of bar rules? Of course not. Ms. Clark clearly did not think she was violating any rules, and our research indicates she was correct about that.

Why do so many lawyers turn against their own clients? For many, it's a matter of survival in a profession where the pursuit of power and billable hours has become far more important than the pursuit of justice.

In far too many cases, corrupt judges decide that one party or attorney is going to receive a favorable judgment--or at least will not suffer the kind of damages that might be inflicted in an honest court. That leaves the other attorney to convince his client that it's best not to push too hard--that justice really is being done, even though it might not look that way.

Experience has taught me that the stronger your case, the more likely you are to be the victim of such a con game. That tells me that Hilda and Larry Clark probably had very strong cases--both in Hall County, Georgia, and in Baldwin County, Alabama.

Many lawyers, under pressure from corrupt judges, would have convinced the Clarks to either give up on their cases or accept offers that amounted to a fraction of what the cases were worth. If that didn't work, many lawyers would have withdrawn from the cases, keeping the Clarks' money and leaving them to seek other counsel or fend for themselves.

Jennifer Paige Clark apparently did not treat her clients that way. And she certainly was not going to treat her parents that way.

By refusing to go along with the game that many lawyers are expected to play, did Jennifer pay with her career--and her life. We think the answer is yes.


(To be continued)

46 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Justice in the U.S. of A. has to become an enlightened democratic system.

Now the totalitarian faction is a body politic ~ a Bush, Rove, Cheney, ROCKEFELLER mafia engaged in the R.I.C.O., for the owners of the injustice.

How lucrative? The TOO BIG TO FAIL prove there is no such idea, truth and justice.

What matters is how much lying, cheating, stealing and killing can be accomplished under the systems' multiple umbrellas: Vanguard, ET AL vile evil cons.

How many lawyers are licensed to practice in America?

How many homeowners' lost their properties in the "Great Recession?" Do the maths and we can see there is a serious problem.

Jennifer Paige was a casualty of the honest brokers' association.

She brokered for her parents in a corrupt system and she was the real deal. Thus, she could not be allowed to live in the U.S. of A.

Now with the internet, we millions can indeed be as Roger Shuler and investigate AND expose the mafia system of about 100% corruption ~ see Don Siegelman in prison.

But, the journalism deep mole investigation is a creative genius gift and We People millions must have the truth of information to deductively reason how to solve the complex problems.

Problems are how we humans evolve our "thinking stuff." Our multi-billion dollar brain cannot be reproduced in spite of all the hype that technology is "God."

Imagination is an individual experience and unique at all times.

We collective humans, are also problem solving individuals and therefore, co-creators of our OWN 'self' and 'collective' "reality/ies."

This is a serious problem in the United States of America: death due to honest brokering of our chosen individual and collective reality/ies.

Time for change. The POTUS is a serious in our imaginations dis-ease in outer reality/ies.

Not a real lawyer and begin with this proof of "just-us-not," truly how vile corrupt the so called "checks and balances" system is.

Your energy is indefatigable LS, what a gift for US all! TX and how to thank you in reality ~ everyone knows what to do for you and Mrs. Schnauzer too.

Ned said...

So, a lawyer can get attacked for representing her own clients in an aggressive way? How comforting.

Anonymous said...

This jumps out at me:

"Rather, it cited Ms. Clark's conduct during the discipline hearing as the primary grounds for suspension."

Sounds like the bar didn't really have anything on Ms. Clark, so they suspended her for defending herself. She didn't grovel enough before the bar? That was her great sin?

Anonymous said...

Mr. Schnauzer,

Of all the stories you've covered, and I read your blog most every day, this one on Jennifer Paige Clark bothers me the most. A good woman died because she dared to not let corrupt judges and bar officials tell her how to represent the best interests of her clients. And as far as I know, the possibility of murder has not been ruled out. I grieve for Jennifer, and I grieve for her family. And I pray that the people responsible are made to pay.

Spaceman said...

If Ms. Clark had worked for Bradley Arant, or another large firm, she would have been fine. Being in a solo practice made her vulnerable.

Anonymous said...

You keep the Alabama State Bar updated on a sticky situation and wind up getting attacked for it. That certainly sounds fair.

Anonymous said...

You learn to practice real law in law school. Once you are licensed to practice, you have to do your job the way the bar wants you to do it. There is a big difference between the two, and it's why many lawyers hate their chosen profession.

legalschnauzer said...

Anon at 8:56--

Thanks for sobering insights from an insider. I think a big issue here is that Jennifer Clark engaged in serious discovery that uncovered events and information that someone did not want disclosed. The U of Alabama is stonewalling on discovery in the Amy Bishop shooting case. I was allowed to conduct no discovery at all in my lawsuit against the U of Alabama. Jennifer Clark wouldn't put up with such crap, so she drew an attack.

Spasmoda said...

I think we need a murder investigation on this--certainly a wrongful-death lawsuit.

legalschnauzer said...

I hope there will be a wrongful-death lawsuit. I'm sure Robert Lusk and Tony McClain, and the other thugs at the Alabama State Bar will claim state immunity. Hope the Clark family can get a lawyer who is able to find a way around that.

Anonymous said...

Nathan Deal and Jason Deal sound like Georgia's version of Bob and Rob Riley.

Anonymous said...

Who was the Alabama judge?

legalschnauzer said...

The judge in Alabama was James Reid, of Baldwin Co. Here is a post that touches on that. More to come:


http://legalschnauzer.blogspot.com/2012/10/did-alabama-state-bar-retaliate-against.html

Redeye said...

Amy Bishop affidavit claims UAH officials fled with guards after hearing she wanted to meet.

http://blog.al.com/breaking/2013/01/amy_bishop_affidavit_claims_ua.html

http://whnt.com/2013/01/31/report-uah-officials-fled-with-guards-after-hearing-bishop-wanted-to-talk-tenure/

Anonymous said...

A woman prosecutor in Portland, Oregon, found dead in her home. She was always in the a.m., ready for the 'dog walker,' who arrived to find the woman dead.

NO investigation nor has the murderer been 'found.'

What was she DEFENDING? Ordinary people vs. the IRS.

Too close to uncovering the demonic agendas which do indeed include the BAR and of course the 'handlers' of the BARs, and the dead are easily and effortlessly buried in a graveyard of don't ask, don't tell!

Certainly, do NOT accuse OR expose the system of digital endless 'money' to do what the most dangerous criminals in earth do, lie-cheat-steal-kill with an immunity that can't be touched.

HOW POWERFUL IS THE BAR?

Frontline's "The Untouchables," should do an entire expose on the B.A.R.s and how unbelievably littered with corruption beyond any of the wildest of imaginations.

A petition for Ms. Paige, at the very least, should Frontline not be interested in outing the killers. She was an intentional hit, just like Aaron Swartz.

legalschnauzer said...

Redeye:

Thanks for sharing this info about the Amy Bishop case. Look forward to checking your links. UA's behavior is smelling more with each passing day.

legalschnauzer said...

Anon at 12:50--

Thanks for your info and insights. Can you provide a link to story about the deceased female attorney in Oregon? Would be interested in learning more about that case. She was going up against the IRS?

legalschnauzer said...

Here are a comment and a response that were mistakenly placed on another post. They belong with this post, and I will publish them here:


David in S. Alabama said...
How is it possible for the Alabama Bar prosecute a compliant against an Alabama attorney for what may have happened in a Georgia court which is under the jusrisdiction of the Georgia Bar.

Why do we not know the cause of death in this case?
January 31, 2013 at 1:17 PM
legalschnauzer said...
Both good questions, David. I know the family recently pushed for a determination on cause of death and was stonewalled. Not sure how the Alabama State Bar would have jurisdiction over events that took place in Georgia, where Ms. Clark had been admitted pro hac vice.

P.S.--David, I think you probably commented on the wrong post. I will move it to the one on Jennifer Page Clark.
January 31, 2013 at 1:34 PM

legalschnauzer said...

Hope to hear back from Anon at 12:50, but in the meantime, I think he/she might be referring to the case of Nancy Bergeson, a federal public defender in Oregon. Her body was discovered in her Portland home in 2009, and cause of death was homicide. The case remains unsolved. Here is one of numerous good articles on the case:

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2012/07/murdered_public_defenders_frie.html

legalschnauzer said...

Here is a good story about the Nancy Bergeson case. It says, at the time of her death, she was defending someone accused of tax crimes, so I'm pretty sure this is the case referenced by @12:50:


http://bojack.org/2011/11/who_killed_nancy_bergeson.html

legalschnauzer said...

Here is a 2011 story on the Nancy Bergeson case in Oregon. It does have similarities to the Jennifer Clark story in the sense that Ms. Bergeson was described as a relentless attorney who zealously defended those charged with federal crimes. Like Ms. Clark, Ms. Bergeson was described as a woman who was active and fit and well liked by her colleagues. He mother is a former state senator in California:


http://www.katu.com/news/local/126049013.html

legalschnauzer said...

More insight on the Nancy Bergeson case from this link:

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/payoffs_for_judges_232.html


"Defendant Roy Bendshadler’s attorney Nancy Bergeson had complained of suspected “jury tampering” and was found strangled to death in her Portland home the next day. Her cause of death was at first passed off as “natural causes” until a second medical examiner changed it to homicide. The murder is unsolved."

legalschnauzer said...

Here is a story about the conviction on tax charges of Marcel Roy Bendshadler in Oregon. Nancy Bergeson was found murdered shortly after the verdict was announced, and she had complained about jury tampering:


http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2009/11/federal_jury_finds_three_guilt.html

Anonymous said...

In my dealings with the Alabama State Bar, I and many others have found that the organization operates much like the Gestapo. Rather than protect the ones they are supposed to serve, the ones whose dues pay their salaries, they act as a goon squad with an agenda. Depending on whom the attorney is or how well connected he may be, they ignore serious violations of the rules. But when an attorney dares to stand up for what is right - well he/she better look out if that stance is opposed to that of the ASB or their cronies. Your comment naming Robert Lusk and Tony McClain "thugs" was spot on. And a casual survey of the attorneys in Alabama would hold that probably 95% of them agree. When attorneys are intimidated by corrupt judges, it is the ASB's job to defend them, not persecute them. But that is not how it works. It is past time for the attorneys in this state to rise up and put a stop to the dictatorial tactics of the ASB.

Anonymous said...

Yes, Legal Schnauzer, you got the woman correct ~ her mother was devastated and quite high up in the order of "government."

Nancy Bergeson upon finding her client(s) correct regarding the IRS FRAUD, was shocked.

ONE STORY IN THE NEWS, RE: SHOCKED ABOUT THE IRS ~ THEN SHE WAS DEAD.

She was extremely FIT and thus, how did she die of 'natural causes' via strangling?! Why has this unsolved 'murder' not been investigated?!

Here is some more new info about our wonderful America:

"... PRIVATE PRISONS ..

.. The prison privatization boom began in the 1980s, under the governments of Ronald Reagan and Bush Sr., but reached its height in 1990 under William Clinton, when Wall Street stocks were selling like hotcakes. Clinton’s program for cutting the federal workforce resulted in the Justice Departments contracting of private prison corporations for the incarceration of undocumented workers and high-security inmates.

.. Private prisons are the biggest business in the prison industry complex. About 18 corporations guard 10,000 prisoners in 27 states. The two largest are Correctional Corporation of America (CCA) and Wackenhut, which together control 75%. Private prisons receive a guaranteed amount of money for each prisoner, independent of what it costs to maintain each one. According to Russell Boraas, a private prison administrator in Virginia, “the secret to low operating costs is having a minimal number of guards for the maximum number of prisoners.” The CCA has an ultra-modern prison in Lawrenceville, Virginia, where five guards on dayshift and two at night watch over 750 prisoners. In these prisons, inmates may get their sentences reduced for “good behavior,” but for any infraction, they get 30 days added – which means more profits for CCA. According to a study of New Mexico prisons, it was found that CCA inmates lost “good behavior time” at a rate eight times higher than those in state prisons.

.. When a federal judge ruled that overcrowding in Texas prisons was cruel and unusual punishment, the CCA signed contracts with sheriffs in poor counties to build and run new jails and share the profits. According to a December 1998 Atlantic Monthly magazine article, this program was backed by investors from Merrill-Lynch, Shearson-Lehman, American Express and Allstate, and the operation was scattered all over rural Texas. That state’s governor, Ann Richards, followed the example of Mario Cuomo in New York and built so many state prisons that the market became flooded, cutting into private prison profits.

.. After a law signed by Clinton in 1996 – ending court supervision and decisions – caused overcrowding and violent, unsafe conditions in federal prisons, private prison corporations in Texas began to contact other states whose prisons were overcrowded, offering “rent-a-cell” services in the CCA prisons located in small towns in Texas. The commission for a rent-a-cell salesman is $2.50 to $5.50 per day per bed. The county gets $1.50 for each prisoner.

.. STATISTICS

.. Ninety-seven percent of 125,000 federal inmates have been convicted of non-violent crimes. It is believed that more than half of the 623,000 inmates in municipal or county jails are innocent of the crimes they are accused of. Of these, the majority are awaiting trial. Two-thirds of the one million state prisoners have committed non-violent offenses. Sixteen percent of the country’s 2 million prisoners suffer from mental illness.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-prison-industry-in-the-united-states-big-business-or-a-new-form-of-slavery/8289

The Prison Industry in the United States: Big Business or a New Form of Slavery? By Vicky Pelaez
Global Research, January 31, 2013
El Diario-La Prensa, New York and Global Research 10 March 2008

e.a.f. said...

If it were not for bloggers such as your self most of this information would not make it into the public eye. People do nothing about these things because they believe it couldn't happen to them. Well it can. Your blog has adequately demonstrated that.

I would add the USA to the list of countries it isn't safe to travel to. First, all the guns and second if you are arrested your rights might very well be violated. Better to go to countries which have a fairer justice system.

I do not see any improvement in the near future. I think it not unreasonable to conclude it will only get worse. The rule of law has become the rule of those with the most money and political influence. If you start to look at how these bar associations, judges, etc. act, along with some federal court decisions you can see this is not the home of the brave and the free but rather that of cowards, bullies, and enslaved .
You have to wonder where some of the large civil rights organizations are. The U.S.A. has the highest incarceration rate in the western world. It isn't doing much better in the legal murder, executiion business either. What a shame.

jeffrey spruill said...

I kept receiving this note from the protectionist racket-"Virginia State Bar" after detailing & documenting David W. Bouchard's criminal activity:

Note to Jeffrey Spruill:
There is no formal appeal process if you disagree with our decision not to initiate a formal investigation into your complaint. However, if you wish us to review our decision, you should write us a brief letter stating new facts supporting your complaint. We cannot receive this information by telephone. The review process may take several weeks; however, the facts and circumstances alleged in your complaint may require us to devote additional time to the review process before we can render a decision. In the event of such a second review, we will notify you in writing of our decision. Please be aware that our limited resources do not allow us to review the same information numerous times. Normally, after we have reviewed your complaint twice,we will not continue to communicate with you about the same complaint. Again, if you do request a second review of your complaint, you should state new facts that you believe we may not have reviewed in our initial analysis your complaint. Please be brief. Merely asking us to
review the same material again is not helpful in evaluating your complaint.

*

It did not take me long to figure out that EVERYTHING I documented was going back to a primary parties of criminal activity:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/21/politics/21bush.html?pagewanted=allhttp://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/21/politics/21bush.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

jeffrey spruill said...

Mr. Schnauzer:

After reading this:

How can the federal judiciary be independent and impartial when the law permits the federal government to secretly award judges up to $25,000 in undisclosed secret “cash awards."

It now makes sense why Judge Robert G. Doumar received the Yaser Esam Hamdi case after the bumbling idiotic FBI screwed my case up(just take a good look at this guy & you'll see what I mean):

http://hamptonroads.com/node/189481

And J. Harvie Wilkinson wrote the opinion in the next friend of Yaser Esam Hamdi.(crimnals just have to play as if they're just)

http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/terrorism/hamdirums71202opn.pdf

Coyote Lane said...

http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/terrorism/hamdirums71202opn.pdf

The Rockefeller-Bush-Cheney-Clinton-Bush-Obama cabal has nothing else but to use the Afghanistan heroin and other drugs to destroy the earth because America was supposed to be the "GOLDEN ARMY" to gulag the planet.

Criminals of Nazism came to America, yes we are in the system which is by design to be anything BUT "Justice."

How to take the U.S. of A. and make certain the countries of China and Russia and any country that has lesser people than the Americans, and bring all the powers into a closer alignment with the TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS, the earth is owned by the so-called "corporations."

Why all countries mostly larger than the smaller ones, in the time of the George W. Bush war criminal decided by international law, choose to profit in the killing of humans, aka "globalism."

Governments are not benevolent and the U.S. was supposedly a government at the highest enlightened level: self.

We learned here in these times with the poor people from Afghanistan and other such countries of dark skinned "evildoers," that the white collar Rollins-Roves-Human-Filth, are the worst cannibals and criminally insane ever to walk on earth in the "aught years." History is already written and the U.S. of A. is not considered other than what this country is: failed as a "democracy."

President of Iceland got it correct, to be an enlightened democratic society in the Twenty-first Century we must not worship the worst criminals that have ever been in the earth plane, but we in the U.S. of A. appear to be too stupid to be a democratic nation of enlightened people.

Bowing down and allowing the robed gavel tyrants to do what they do to a beautiful woman like Jennifer Paige Clark is proof of how sick America is, along with all the poor people who were killed to prove a Jihad is make believe in the minds of the criminally insane.

Coyote Lane said...

"... Mr Gomberg possibly took his cue for this map from US president Franklin D. Roosevelt, whose speech about Four Freedoms and a Moral Order (from his State of the Union to the 77-th Congress) he quotes, before outlining his own vision (at the bottom of the map):

.. “As the USA with the cooperation of the Democracies of Latin-America, the British Commonwealth of Nations and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, assumes world leadership for the establishment of a New World Moral Order for permanent peace, justice, security and world reconstruction.”

.. “OUR POLICY SHALL BE THIS:

1. We, the U.S.A., in cooperation with our allies, for reasons of our national safety and in the interests of international morality, are determined to crush and completely destroy the military power of the Axis aggressors, and their satellites regardless of cost, effort and time necessary to accomplish this task.

PLEASE VIEW THE MAPS AT THIS SITE, WELL WORTH THE TIME TO UNDERSTAND THIS "NEW WORLD ORDER"

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-post-war-ii-new-world-order-map-a-proposal-to-re-arrange-the-world-after-an-allied-victory/19706

The Post War II New World Order Map: A Proposal to Re-arrange the World after an Allied Victory, Revealed By Irish Historian Thomas Moriarty, By Maurice Gomberg, Global Research, February 02, 2013
Global Research 12 June 2010

jeffrey spruill said...

@Coyote:

The Norther Alliance corralled completely innocent folks & sold them into Guantanamo Bay, Cuba slavery.

Then we had to listen to Laura Ingraham & Sean Hannity bitch about how inmates at Guantanamo were being fed cocoa puffs.

Coyote Lane said...

"... There is a transnational ruling class, a "Superclass", that agrees on establishing a world government...

.. The middle class is targeted for elimination, because most of the world has no middle class, and to fully integrate and internationalize a middle class, would require industrialization and development in Africa, and certain places in Asia and Latin America...

.. The goal of the Superclass is not to lose their wealth and power to a transnational middle class, but rather to extinguish the notion of a middle class, and transnationalize a lower, uneducated, labor oriented class, through which they will secure ultimate wealth and power...

.. The global economic crisis serves these ends, as whatever remaining wealth the middle class holds is in the process of being eliminated, and as the crisis progresses, the middle classes of the world will suffer, while a great percentage of lower classes of the world, poverty-stricken even prior to the crisis, will suffer the greatest, most probably leading to a massive reduction in population levels, particularly in the "underdeveloped" or "Third World" states..."

... Andrew Gavin Marshall, 'The Global Economic Crisis: The Great Depression of the XXI Century'

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/index.html

"... Today Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence...

.. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil...

.. The one thing every man fears is the unknown...

.. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government..."

Henry Kissinger speaking at the annual Bilderberger meeting, May 21, 1992

Anonymous said...

"What you don’t know about the Bilderberg-Group, by Thierry Meyssan ~~

http://www.voltairenet.org/article169651.html

The idea that the Bilderberg Group is behind the creation of a mysterious future World Government has been spreading for years.

Having had access to the archives of this very secret club, Thierry Meyssan shows that this belief leads in a false direction, serving to mask the true identity and function of the Group.

In reality, the Bilderberg Group is a creation of NATO.

It aims to influence key leaders on a global scale and, through them, to manipulate public opinion to get it to embrace the ideas and actions of the Northern Atlantic Alliance" ~~

http://www.voltairenet.org/article169651.html

Anonymous said...

Terrorism:

Judge Imposimato accuses Bilderberg ---

In a book published in early January, La Repubblica delle stragi impunite (The Republic of the Unpunished Massacres. The unpublished papers of the bloody events that have shaken our country), Italian Judge Ferdinando Imposimato places the blame on NATO for organizing the bloody attacks that ripped through Italy during the 1980’s.

Honorable Imposimato presided over several terrorism-related cases, including the kidnapping and ultimate assassination of President Aldo Moro and the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II. He was a leading anti-Mafia and is currently honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy. He was elected to the Chamber of Deputies (Parliament) under the label of the Democratic Party of the Left and subsequently to the Senate.

The book comprises, in particular, a 1967 document pointing to the involvement of the Bilderberg Group, a club that brings together the most influential people to defend the interests of NATO.

http://www.voltairenet.org/article177340.html

Anonymous said...

"Ever since the days of Henry Ford, the Economic Elite have needed a thriving US middle class to increase growth and profits, but now, in the global economy, they view the US middle class as obsolete. They increasingly look globally for profits and they would rather pay cheap labor in countries like China and India."

David DeGraw

HOW THE WORLD REALLY WORKS

Evelyn De Rothschild / Queen Elizabeth II / David Rockefeller

The CIA was created by the National Security Act of 1947. The ink was barely dry on it before an army of spooks began marching through the law's major loophole: the CIA could "perform such other functions and duties...as the National Security Council may from time to time direct." This deliberately vague clause opened the door to a half-century of criminal activity in the name of "national security."

One of the first duties the NSC deemed necessary was the subversion of Italian democracy...in the name of democracy, of course.

Italy seemed likely to elect a leftist government in the 1948 election. To make sure Italians voted instead for the candidates Washington favored-leftover brownshirt thugs from Mussolini's party and other Nazi collaborators-millions of dollars were spent on propaganda and payoffs. It was also intimated that food aid would be cut off if the election results were inconsistent with US desires.

The US got its way in 1948 without having to resort to violence but-as was discovered in 1990- the CIA had organized a secret paramilitary army in postwar Italy, with hidden stockpiles of weapons and explosives dotting the map.

Called Operation Gladio (gladius is Latin for sword), the ostensible excuse for it was laughable-the threat of a Soviet invasion.

But the real purpose wasn't so funny-Operation Gladio's 15,000 troops were trained to overthrow the Italian government should it stray from the straight and narrow.

Similar secret armies were formed in France, Belgium, the Netherlands and West Germany- often directed, quite naturally, by former SS officers.

They didn't just wait around for the Russians to come marching in; they assembled huge arms caches (many of which remain unaccounted for), compiled blacklists of leftists and, in France, participated in plots to assassinate President DeGaulle.

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA%20Hits/Gladio_CIAHits.html

Anonymous said...

09Apr08 - Dennis Wheatley - New World Order is 'another name for hell'

http://bilderberg.org/skulbone.htm#dennis

Have you ever wondered what the origin of the phrase 'New World Order' is?

Earliest source I can find is from 1941. THis is the first time this quotation has ever been posted on the web. I just checked. Seems pretty clear to me, by New World Order' Wheatley means the central objective of Nazi political control. Which by no means died in 1944.

Thankfully, though these C21 Nazi control freaks are convinced their diabolical plan is possible, they can and will never achieve it.

They may rather burn the world to the ground trying, and failing.

Closing paragraphs of STRANGE CONFLICT by Dennis Wheatley

First published by Hutchinson, 1941
From Chapter XXII - THE GREAT GOD PAN

Spoken by Wheatley's protagonist Monseigneur le Duc de Richleau, Knight of the Most Exalted Order of the Golden Fleece. The Duc is addressing his friends Simon Aron, Marie Lou, Rex Van Ryn and Richard Eaton who he's just helped rescue from a Nazi-Voodoo priest who has been remote viewing Britain's vital Atlantic convoy routes:

…"Whether or not Hitler and Mussolini themselves are great masters of Black Magic, nobody can possibly contest that it is through such ambitious and unscrupulous men, German, Italian and Japanese, that the Powers of Darkness are working and in recent years have acquired such a terrifying increase of strength upon our earth.

"The New World Order which they wish to bring about is but another name for Hell. If through them Evil prevailed, every man and woman of every race and colour would finally be enslaved, from the cradle to the grave. They would be brought up to worship might instead of right and would be taught to condone, or even praise, murder, torture and the suppression of all liberty as 'necessary' to the welfare of 'the State'.

Illuminati Kingpin George Bush Sr. Turns 88, by JENNA B USH (NBC)

http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=39&contentid=9962

jeffrey spruill said...

LS:

I went back & reread the next friend of Yaser Esam Hamdi opinion & almost--well I did gag that Judge Robert G. Doumar wrote this:

“Hamdi must be allowed to meet with his attorney because of fundamental justice provided under the Constitution.”

The criminals in the Bush/Rove DOJ had no shame.

Anonymous said...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/rosa-koire-breaks-down-the-social-engineering-of-humanity.html

Rosa Koire Breaks Down The Social Engineering of Humanity

Alex also talks with Rosa Koire, a forensic commercial real estate appraiser specializing in eminent domain valuation who opposes the draconian Agenda 21 plan for humanity. Koire is the author of Behind The Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21, a book now available at the Infowars Store.

Anonymous said...

http://www.boombustblog.com/index.php?option=com_k2&Itemid=200069&id=3571&lang=en&task=3571&view=item

The blogosphere has won against mainstream media, LS, that means your work is "God's" getting done now and to hell with Goldman Sachs!

Anonymous said...

http://englishrussia.com/2013/01/24/revolution-in-pictures/#more-118870

uh oh, coming here since the key shadow government is same now as when the paintings were 'executed!'

Anonymous said...

"In this age of austerity, that looks like an attractive option, but it would be the wrong option. Because security challenges won't wait while we fix our finances, and more cuts now will lead to greater insecurity in the future, at a cost we simply can't afford. We saw this after the Cold War, when we were ill prepared to respond to the crises in the Balkans."

.. He noted that since 2001, the U.S. share of NATO defense spending has risen from 63 percent to 72 percent, while most European nations have cut their defense budgets.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/nato-chief-urges-europe-cut-defense-budgets-18384358

NATO = "HELL" ~ ONE WORLD GOV

http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com/

WHY THE COURT SYSTEM IN THE U.S. OF A. HAS NO ACCOUNTABILITY.

1949, NATO was and is, U.S. of A. SHADOW GOVERNMENT

Anonymous said...

"... And here's the (elusive) heart of the matter. What Beijing actually wants is to get rid of the US dollar peg. For that to happen, it needs vast gold reserves. So here's Beijing pivoting from the US dollar to the yuan - and trying to sway vast swathes of the global economy to follow the path. This golden rule is Beijing's Maltese Falcon: "The stuff dreams are made of".

.. Have drone, will travel
Qatar also does pivoting - but of the MENA (Middle East-Northern Africa) kind. Doha has been financing Wahhabis and Salafis - and even Salafi-jihadis - as in North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) rebels in Libya, Free Syrian Army gangs in Syria, and the pan-Islamic gang that took over northern Mali.

.. So even as David Petraeus-style counterinsurgency has pivoted to John Brennan's CIA shadow wars, the real deal is the pivoting to Asia; a pseudo-strategy, concocted to keep the Pentagon budget at exorbitant levels, promoting a new cold war with China. "They will never amass enough gold to impose their evil plans", one could hear Marshall say about China (without Bogart or Greenstreet's aplomb, of course). Hammett would be appalled; Marshall's Maltese Falcon is the stuff (war) dreams are made of.

.. Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2008). He may be reached at pepeasia@yahoo.com.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/OB01Ad01.html

Coyote Lane said...

fyi Legal Schnauzer, www.theartof12.blogspot.com as an information tool, see Kissinger and the "Trial" of him in both writing as well youtube

You've inspired we artists, there, but unlike your mastery of technology, we're so slow getting going again after so much destruction via the 'evildoers'!

enjoy the Romney & Obama pics, too!

Anonymous said...

THE TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS THAT HAVE THE GREATEST CONTROL OVER THE GLOBAL ECONOMY - 2011

A scientific study on the global financial system was undertaken at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Switzerland, October 2011.

Using a database which listed 37 million companies and investors worldwide, the researchers studied all 43,060 transnational corporations (TNCs), including the share ownerships linking them.

The top 737 of these super-corporations or "super-entities" control 80% of the world economy.

The top 147 super-corporations or "super-entities" control 40% of the global economy through direct and indirect ownership or controlling interest.

Below are the top 50 of the 147 super-corporations which have the greatest impact on the global economy.

1 - BARCLAYS PLC - GREAT BRITIAN
2 - CAPITAL GROUP COMPANIES INC. - UNITED STATES
3 - FMR CORP (Fidelity Management) - UNITED STATES
4 - AXA FR 6712 - SWITZERLAND
5 - STATE STREET CORPORATION - UNITED STATES
6 - JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. - UNITED STATES
7 - LEGAL & GENERAL GROUP PLC - GREAT BRITAIN
8 - VANGUARD GROUP, INC. - UNITED STATES
9- UBS AG - SWITZERLAND
10 - MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. - UNITED STATES
11 - WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT CO. L.L.P. - UNITED STATES
12 - DEUTSCHE BANK AG - GERMANY
13 - FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC. - UNITED STATES
14 - CREDIT SUISSE GROUP - SWITZERLAND
15 - WALTON ENTERPRISES LLC - UNITED STATES
16 - BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP. - UNITED STATES
17 - NATIXIS - FRANCE
18 - GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. - UNITED STATES
19 - T. ROWE PRICE GROUP, INC. - UNITED STATES
20- LEGG MASON, INC. - UNITED STATES
21 - MORGAN STANLEY - UNITED STATES
22 - MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. - JAPAN
23 - NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION - UNITED STATES
24 - SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE - FRANCE
25 - BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION - UNITED STATES
26 -LLOYDS TSB GROUP PLC - GREAT BRITAIN
27 - INVESCO PLC - GREAT BRITAIN
28 - ALLIANZ SE - GERMANY
29 - TIAA US 6601 - INDIA
30 - OLD MUTUAL PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY - GREAT BRITAIN
31 - AVIVA PLC - GREAT BRITAIN
32 - SCHRODERS PLC - GREAT BRITIAN
33 - DODGE & COX - UNITED STATES
34 - LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC. - UNITED STATES
35 - SUN LIFE FINANCIAL, INC. - CANADA
36 - STANDARD LIFE PLC - GREAT BRITAIN
37 - CNCE - FRANCE
38 - NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC. - JAPAN
39 - THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY - UNITED STATES
40 - MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSUR. - UNITED STATES
41 - ING GROEP N.V. - NETHERLANDS
42 - BRANDES INVESTMENT PARTNERS, L.P. - UNITED STATES
43 - UNICREDITO ITALIANO SPA - ITALY
44 - DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OF JP - JAPAN
45 - VERENIGING AEGON - NETHERLANDS
46 - BNP PARIBAS - FRANCE
47 - AFFILIATED MANAGERS GROUP, INC. - UNITED STATES
48 RESONA HOLDINGS, INC. - JAPAN
49 - CAPITAL GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. - UNITED STATES
50 - CHINA PETROCHEMICAL GROUP CO. - CANADA

http://beyondthemediamatrix.net/

Coyote Lane said...

LS, your inspiration,

IDA TARBELL, A Journalistic Masterpiece,

www.theartof12.blogspot.com

Long Beach DUI lawyer firm said...

Peters, Swartz’s lawyer, told HuffPost that Heymann had harassed several of the activist’s friends into testifying before a grand jury. Peters said federal prosecutors deserved some blame for his death, echoing comments from Swartz's family.