Thursday, September 13, 2012

Towels Soiled With Feces Point to Child Sexual Abuse Involving Campus Crest CEO Ted Rollins

A maid found dozens of soiled towels hidden in a closet at about the time North Carolina social-services officials were investigating a report of possible child sexual abuse against Campus Crest Communities CEO Ted Rollins.

The maid showed the towels, stained with fecal matter and other debris, to Sherry Carroll Rollins, who was married to Ted Rollins at the time. Ms. Rollins told Legal Schnauzer in an interview that more than 100 soiled towels were stuffed into the closet. She said she relayed the information at the time to a Duke University psychologist, and he said the discovery was a sign that homosexual activity had been taking place in the home. (See videos at the end of this post.)

In fact, the psychologist suggested that Ms. Rollins read a book called The Homosexual Matrix to help her better understand what apparently was going on between her then husband and her son (Ted Rollins' step son).

Ms. Rollins disclosed the discovery of soiled towels to me on multiple occasions during the course of my reporting on the Rollins v. Rollins divorce case, which I've called the worst courtroom cheat job that I've encountered in the civil arena. She and I most recently discussed the towels, and other signs of child sexual abuse during her marriage to Ted Rollins, during a lunch meeting where my wife was present and taking notes.

The maid had mentioned an ever-growing volume of missing towels to Ms. Rollins several times and became concerned that the family might think she was stealing them. "When she found all the towels in a closet under the stairs, she made sure to show me because she had feared I might think she was stealing them," Ms. Rollins said. "There must have been more than 100 towels that were stained with feces."

The Homosexual Matrix, written in 1975 by former Alfred Kinsey associate C.A. Tripp, is considered one of the most comprehensive early works on gay behavior. The Duke psychologist, Ms. Rollins said, thought the book would help her better "understand the activities of homosexuals and the things they use in their activities."

This story inadvertently has a connection to presidential politics. Former GOP candidate Rick Santorum once angered gays by comparing homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia. Syndicated sex columnist Dan Savage responded with a contest to "memorialize the scandal." The winning entry held that Santorum's last name means "the frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex."

For our current purposes, it appears the Rollins family maid discovered "Santorum" on the towels in a closet. While that use of a politician's last name is designed to draw chuckles, there is nothing funny about its usage here. It is a disturbing sign that something was seriously amiss in the Rollins household--and even more troubling, North Carolina officials didn't do much of anything about it.

In the first video at the end of this post, Ms. Rollins and I discuss via telephone several matters related to the apparent child sexual abuse involving her former husband.

In the second video, she references her records from the psychologist at Duke and discusses the overwhelming anger she feels toward Ted Rollins because of the abuse he has inflicted on her children. "It inflames me every time I pull it up from the depths," she says.

Ms. Rollins states that she has moments where she wants to see her ex husband dead, a stark example of the deep emotion a divorce case can generate--and Rollins is the most abusive divorce case I've ever heard about. It should be noted, however, that this audio was taped several months ago, and Ted Rollins remains very much alive. As the person on the other end of the phone line, I knew Ms. Rollins' statements were made out of frustration and were not meant to be taken literally. I communicated with Sherry Rollins a lot over a two-year period, and I never once have thought she would harm any living being. I consider her to be a person of kind spirit and good intentions, and I put these statements under the category of "letting off steam." I also know that Ms. Rollins has strong reasons to believe her life has been in danger several times during her divorce case--and in its aftermath. That ongoing sense of fear probably drives statements that might sound extreme to someone who doesn't know the context in which they were uttered.

In a moment of levity, Ms. Rollins invokes the name of her dog, Gus, and swears on his life that "everything I've told you is true, it's not a lie. . . . If I sat around and made up stuff like this, I would really be in need of meds. . . .

"The more I tell this . . . and I come home (to realize) I've left some more of it out."

Ted Rollins has been given multiple opportunities to respond to questions about the abusive relationship with his stepson. When I asked him via e-mail about documented reports of his conviction for assault of his stepson, Rollins made a bogus reference to "your stalking and harassment of my children" and added this reply:

I am not in the habit of responding to rubbish such as yours. Please refrain from contacting me or my children.

I sent the following response, specifically asking about the investigation involving possible child sexual abuse. Ted Rollins never responded to my questions:

Are you saying that the reports I've received about the beating of Zac Parrish are inaccurate?
          If so, in what way?
You think the beating of a 15-year-old boy who was under your care is "rubbish" and addressing it is "wasting time"? You think child abuse, in general, is not worthy of your attention? 
I've given you more than a dozen opportunities to respond to issues raised in my blog--and to point out anything that is inaccurate or misleading--and you haven't done it yet. 
Are you not going to address any of the substantive issues raised in the questions I sent? That's certainly your prerogative, but it's my duty as a journalist to make sure you have an opportunity to respond to these issues. If you change your mind about addressing questions, please let me know. 
For the record, your statement regarding "stalking and harassment" of your children is wildly twisted. My only communication with Sarah Rollins was instigated by her--she called me, out of the blue. 
The issue here is your treatment of your children. 
On that front, I've received reports from multiple sources stating that you were investigated for sexual abuse of Zac Parrish while you lived in North Carolina. As you probably are aware, the issue of child sexual abuse has been front-page news across the country in the wake of the Jerry Sandusky scandal at Penn State, plus other similar reports. I've been told a number of details about the situation in your home that led to the North Carolina investigation. I have a lot of questions on that subject and would be glad to send them if you let me know that you are willing to address them. Otherwise, I will refrain from communicating with you and move forward with my reporting. 
One final point: I have contacted you via e-mail at your invitation. You told me in our one phone conversation that you would be "more than happy" to respond to written questions. I want it to be clear that I've treated you exactly in the way that you asked to be treated, and you've had every opportunity to respond to various issues.


Anonymous said...

Schnauzer . . .

Haven't you heard of the "breakfast test"? If someone won't want to read about it over breakfast, you aren't supposed to write about it.

I just about lost my breakfast!

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

Going to put "The Homosexual Matrix" on my reading list. Sounds interesting.

Anonymous said...


These videos might make some readers uncomfortable, but I'm glad you published them. You can hear the stress and strain in Ms. Rollins voice. I never doubted, from reading your posts, that her ex had put her through hell. But these recordings make it very clear. Ted Rollins has abused a number of people, in various ways. You can hear the abuse in Ms. Rollins voice, feel it in her words.

Anonymous said...

Legal Schnauzer, this is truly incredible reporting and about time for Americans to get the actual news in picture word reality time.

The spook knew you were closing in on this story, now I get why IT was spooking your site.

Confirms the truth.

I, having been also a science and math student, as well as artist that gets to see almost everything in the world, way it is, as journalists know ...


How better to take a society and cause severe confusion?

First step in physics: identify our "physical" reality.

I actually feel very sorry for Ted Rollins and I completely understand how former Mrs. Rollins' feels about the ultimate betrayal, her children have been intentionally destroyed in a level of their mind that can only heal by way of deep, deep, years and years of "therapy."

Clearly this story is one of the BIG deep tap root problems of our American "broke back" society.

Second, homosexuality is as old as dirt itself, BUT in ROME the behavior was out of control and so, the "HOMOS" were all led to the Roman "Circuses" and slaughtered as too insane.

That was in the END GAMES.

Where is America now? There are real homosexuals and this happens in the womb, a confusion does occur, but not an epidemic.


Good question to pose, since the epidemic of homosexuality globally, and yes especially here in the US, is a scientific impossibility and, certainly the probability should be examined carefully by scientists and not the ones that also ignored 9-1-1.

The PROSTITUTES in Copenhagen, exposed the fraud of epidemic homosexuality. When they were not going to be allowed to do biz, while the BIG O was there and the GREEN AGENDA, the prostitutes provided script for free tricks, first one, then after that FIRST FREE ONE, there were charges that cancelled out, they said as good economists, the CO2 breath charge deal that our BIG O the "switch hitter," did not see as the collapse to his Agenda 21.

Thus, the nappies of the babies in the cold countries were uncovered as THE LONG TERM AGENDA to manufacture NO GENDER humans and it has worked, see Rollins' and the "Project For A New American Century," PNAC, it is about the THIRD GENERATION that are in charge and we know them by the fact, that, they do not practice other than dark deeds to destroy the REAL FAMILY. Called THE BLOB, and in scientific factual discovery, ONLY ONE IN 1000, in the womb, are to be "homosexual" from the "endocrine in the womb," "confusion." DO THE MATHS, KARL ROVE, ET AL? GENDER BENT.

When Gender Bent, the "human" is a MONSTER, just as TRANSGENDERS say, it is A DEATHLESS DEATH. No longer one sex, and not the other EXCEPT via artificiality.

No endocrine intelligence, which IS the "human thermometer to navigate" = no real brain synapse as "healthy" AND,

BLOOD GAS chemistry as "natural?" Absolutely, unequvocially, NOT.

Sad truth that cannot recover from the vile evil without full exposure of the criminal insanity.

Are Americans awakening to our militant government and ITS' inhuman, subhuman filth agendas?

Ted Rollins? Are you waking up to what has been done to your mind? What about all the robed gavel tyrants in very controlled environments for every "need," and "want," too, clearly, the air, food, water and all is definitely handed on platters of digital credit and many have been "straight" and are no more. Hmmm.

There was a woman USDC "Justice" with five sons and then woops, not "straight" anymore. Sad reality regarding one of her sons, he committed suicide and then perhaps the light when on?

This is the tragedy of artificialty that has been in the U.S. as "CULTURE" modern designed by the sickest "rulers" known as the Houses, Rothschild et al.

Anonymous said...

"... Paul R. Pillar, in his 28 years at the Central Intelligence Agency, rose to be one of the agency’s top analysts. He is now a visiting professor at Georgetown University for security studies. (This article first appeared as a blog post at The National Interest’s Web site. Reprinted with author’s permission.)

Would Neocons Control Romney? By Paul R. Pillar, Global Research, September 13, 2012

?CIA not controller of the USA?

Roberta Kelly and the other post about Gender Bent, sorry meant to put my name

Anonymous said...

"... The World Justice Project released its 2010 ‘Rule of Law Index’ ranking the top 11 developed countries based on its citizens’ access to civil justice. The US ranked the lowest ...."

Anonymous said...


Is it legal to tape record someone like this? Did you break the law, buddy?

legalschnauzer said...

Anon at 11:25--

Laws vary from state to state, but it is legal in Alabama. And no, I did not break the law, buddy.

Anonymous said...

Buddy, you're here again, spooky.

Circumcise. Is this your problem?

So many males do not understand that the mutilation was an intentional.

You are one, spooky buddy legal know it all, that has been "apartheid" in the head!??

Go for an MRI, CIA, "buddy" and you can prove to your own "head" you are not right with the circumcised penis that may or may not work other than for a "buttbuddy?" Too confused.

Sad but, true. Takes a very STRONG INDIVIDUAL MIND to keep the "endocrine" system functioning properly when so much DR. MENGELES' "western medicine" has been "epidemically" sold as though "health." Nazis went to South America, then changed names and presto we got "western" law, medicine, and yes, even society.

You ok with your apartheid buddy?

In a word, no, or else, leave your name for HELP and we the true Americans may be able to do something kind for your kind.

Apartheid means in definition APART "SPLIT" IN THE HOOD, now compare this with the hood of your penis, a natural born protection removed by a modern Dr. Mengele wanna be.

Roberta Kelly

Anonymous said...


Roberta Kelly here again, FYI:

Film by Tomás D’Amico and Ignacio Goett, September 11, 2012, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Kurt Sonnenfeld: The man behind the camera

Eleven years after 9/11, Voltaire Network has the privilege to present a newly released film containing undisclosed images, footage and documents about Kurt Sonnenfeld and his work at Ground Zero as videographer on assignment for the U.S. Government.

Sonnenfeld has been living in exile in Argentina since 2003.
Voltaire Network | 11 September 2012,

The video productions are vital. The LS videos have been what the American public need, to recover in this therapy time of,


"... Attack on U.S. Consulate illustrates disastrous outcome of Obama’s humanitarian intervention in Libya as photos indicate torture before the murder.

Earlier today the US ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens was killed by the same terrorist he helped put into power.

Following the initial reports that he and 3 other Americans on his staff were murdered when terrorists fired Rocket Propelled Grenades on his vehicles the corporate media reported US officials were stating the attacks were planned beforehand.

Now both the official story about an RPG attack and hence claims that terrorist planned the attack beforehand are being brought into question.

The questions center around new evidence which appears to show that the Ambassador was in fact held captive and tortured by Libya militants prior to his death and then he was paraded on the streets after he was murdered.

Read more…


Ready to leave your name so we can do the MRI or whatever it is going to take for your "therapy?" So many of you and so little time.

Concerned American.

Anonymous said...

Author Leah McGrath Goodman was on Max Keiser Show the other day to discuss the island of Jersey (between France and England), which is the largest tax haven in the world and was site to a horrific child-abuse scandal.

Here is link to Keiser Report. His interview with Ms. Goodman starts at about 13:00. She says the wealthy have a history of abusing children, and Jersey is an awful example of it:

Anonymous said...

sorry for all misspells, my eyes were intentionally sprayed by our militant police, they do not want "women" who can "see."

Tx for the video, Max Keiser is one of the best, too, just like LS.


jeffrey spruill said...

This is absolutely DISGUSTING!

Ted Rollins twisting the mind of a young teenage boy by predatory sexual abuse.

Chad Essick needs to be contacted & asked-- "when is the law firm of Poyner Spruill going to treat the Rollings account as --- persona non grata.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Author Leah McGrath Goodman was on Max Keiser Show the other day to discuss the island of Jersey (between France and England), which is the largest tax haven in the world and was site to a horrific child-abuse scandal.

Here is link to Keiser Report. His interview with Ms. Goodman starts at about 13:00. She says the wealthy have a history of abusing children, and Jersey is an awful example of it:

I truly believe every American should visit the link provided at your site by anon, thank you again, anon for the amazing Max Keiser and Leah.

Please readers here, understand how Legal Schnauzer, you, too, are to be discovered as was Max, the bravery and courage is what is considered the revolutionary act to be for "real" change!

Anonymous said...

How can you confirm any of this through social services? Under North Carolina law those records are only available from a court order or by the minor once they are over 18

Anonymous said...

"... In the short film ..

Sonnenfeld reveals for the first time some of the footage and images he recorded during his tour of duty at Ground Zero.

Film by Tomás D’Amico and Ignacio Goett, September 11, 2012, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Eleven years after 9/11, Voltaire Network has the privilege to present a newly released film containing undisclosed images, footage and documents about Kurt Sonnenfeld and his work at Ground Zero as videographer on assignment for the U.S. Government.

Sonnenfeld has been living in exile in Argentina since 2003.
Voltaire Network | 11 September 2012,



see to see what to STOP DOING.

legalschnauzer said...


Ted Rollins' checks probably clear, and that's all Poyner Spruill cares about. I haven't heard from Mr. Essick in quite a while. Maybe this will bring him out of the closet.

legalschnauzer said...

Anon at 2:02--

I think you answered your own question. I suspect a court order is the main way to get confirmation via social services.

Based on my research, I'm convinced the records exist. One question I have in all of this: Why did the psychologist from Duke suggest Ms. Rollins read a book? Why didn't he report this to authorities? He obviously suspected something was deeply amiss in the household and the child needed protection. How is a book going to do that?

Anonymous said...

Your convinced they exist. Isn't 101 to verify sources. So I guess you should be compared more to the national enquirer than a true journalist reporting facts. This makes you look very minor league to your peers. You are using word of mouth source without checking facts. A woman that has been put through a divorce is your only source. We should all look for your next post while we are in the grocery store check out line.

legalschnauzer said...

Anon at 5:13--

You might try rereading my work on this subject. I said two different family members confirmed that the investigation took place. They were eye witnesses to the whole process, so that certainly does "verify sources," to use your term. If you know anything about journalism or any other form of research, checking records is only one way to verify facts. Eyewitness accounts is another, and I have verification via multiple family sources. As you acknowledge, records in this instance are not readily available.

In your world, a "woman who has been put through a divorce" is not to be believed. That woman told me about a beating involving Ted Rollins and the same stepson, which the stepson denied, lying right to my face. And guess what, public records support Ms. Rollins version to the letter. I stand by my sources, who have proven to be credible.

Much more is coming on this story. Today's post only scratches the surface.

Anonymous said...

Sherry is repugnant. Who would allow their new husband to copulate with her son? I guess the money was just too much for her to protect Zac.

I respect your reporting, LS. However, I think Sherry Rollins is a money grubbing whore that allowed her son to be sodomized because she enjoyed the money Teddy was bringing home.

Just my opinion, though.


legalschnauzer said...


So you acknowledge that Ted Rollins was copulating with Ms. Rollins' son. That's item No. 1 that jumps out at me.

You seem to be assuming that Ms. Rollins knew her husband was copulating with her son. Those are facts not in evidence, as far as I know. If you have facts to support that claim, feel free to share.

According to Ted Rollins' child-support affidavit, he was only making $50,000 a year. Doesn't sound like the money he brought home was all that great--unless, of course, you admit that Ted Rollins is a child rapist and a perjurer.

Even if your statements about Ms. Rollins is true, you also are admitting that Ted Rollins is a child rapist. Ms. Rollins is not CEO of a publicly traded company, doing business with taxpayer-funded universities, but Ted Rollins is.

Assuming your statements as facts, who committed the greater offense here? Offenses don't get much worse than child rape, in the public's eyes.