Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Jeff Sessions provides more evidence that his mental faculties are failing, while U.S. Senate hopeful Bradley Byrne appears hopelessly out of touch with reality


Jeff Sessions
Former Trump attorney general Jeff Sessions provided more evidence over the weekend that his mental faculties are eroding. Meanwhile, a candidate for Sessions' old U.S. Senate seat sounds like his brain wattage is not so hot, either.

Sessions' most recent tussle with the language came Saturday when he addressed the Alabama Republican Party Executive Committee at the Birmingham-Jefferson Convention Complex. From an article at Alabama Political Reporter (APR):

Sessions said that he was very proud of what he accomplished while he was Attorney General.

“No cabinet department did more to advance the Trump agenda than the Justice Department,” Sessions said.

Sessions said that he worked to make the DOJ less political. “It was time to end the politicization of the Department of Justice.”

Let's break that down into two parts:

(1) Sessions says the Department of Justice (DOJ), on his watch, did more to advance the Trump agenda than any other cabinet department -- even though long-standing rules hold the DOJ is to operate independently of the White House.

(2) Sessions claims he made the DOJ less political.

Statement No. 2 came mere seconds after Sessions admitted having worked to advance a political agenda in the nation's chief law-enforcement agency.

The notion that Sessions might be "out of it" mentally arose recently with the release of The Threat, a book by former FBI Director Andrew McCabe. From a recent report at Newsweek:

Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions regularly and casually used shocking racist sentiments while serving in President Donald Trump's cabinet, according to a new book written by former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

In his memoir—titled The ThreatMcCabe paints a picture of an attorney general who struggled to understand the workings of government, was unable to stay on top of his busy schedule and blamed almost all the country’s problems on immigration, Washington Post reporter Greg Miller wrote in his review of the book.

In one particularly shocking exchange, Sessions reportedly told McCabe the FBI was a better organization when “you all only hired Irishmen.” Drawing on archaic and offensive stereotypes, he clarified, “They were drunks but they could be trusted. Not like all those new people with nose rings and tattoos—who knows what they’re doing?”

McCabe's portrayal of Sessions gets even more alarming:

Sessions’ views on race were described as “reprehensible” and constantly aimed to link immigration to crime, Miller reported. The attorney general “believed that Islam—inherently—advocated extremism,” while discussions about specific criminal suspects always began with the question, “Where’s he from?” quickly followed by, “Where are his parents from?”

Not only was Sessions outwardly ignorant about ethnic minorities, he also apparently struggled to keep up with the most basic demands of his job. The former Alabama senator—whom Trump reportedly once branded “mentally retarded” and a “dumb Southerner”—had “trouble focusing, particularly when topics of conversation strayed from a small number of issues.”

McCabe also noted that electronic tablets used to deliver the daily presidential brief to Sessions came back with no sign that he had even entered the passcode to view the important document. He not only failed to read other intelligence reports but also got confused between classified material and information he read in newspaper clippings.

Is Jeff Sessions out of touch with reality? Consider these words from APR's report on the speech in Birmingham:

“President Trump is making great appointments to the judiciary,” Sessions added. “We need another four years of good Trump judicial appointees.”

If that line doesn't make you guffaw, I'm not sure what will. A review of the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings to the U.S. Supreme Court suggests Trump can't even nominate a decent human being, much less a good judge.

Bradley Byrne
As for the man who would claim Sessions old seat -- currently held by the oily Doug Jones, who is nothing more than a bootlicker for Rob Riley -- we are talking about U.S. Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-Fairhope), who announced his candidacy last week. Byrne supports Trump's efforts to build a border wall and claims it is a matter of "fairness" and respect for "the rule of law." From a post at Byrne's blog:

Growing up, my parents taught me the basic values of fairness and following the rules. I think these values were common in households all across our state and country.

In today’s society, those two basic values need to be applied to the ongoing debate about illegal immigration.

In terms of fairness, we have people who are going through the legal process to enter our country, which takes time and effort, only to have people skip that entire process and just walk across our border illegally. That goes against the basic value of fairness.

Also, we are a nation built on laws, but currently illegal immigrants openly disregard the rules and laws of our country. By not holding them accountable, we are further encouraging a culture where the rule of law does not matter.

Immigrants disregard our laws? Has Byrne considered public officials from his own party in Alabama? In recent years, we've had a governor (Robert Bentley), speaker of the House (Mike Hubbard), and chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court (Roy Moore) forced out of office due to corruption charges.

As for Donald Trump, Byrne claims to agree with the president on almost all issues. But how does that square with Byrne's supposed concerns about "fairness"? Wouldn't it be fair for Trump to fulfill his campaign promise to have Mexico pay for a border wall, rather than U.S. taxpayers? And Byrne actually believes Trump abides by the rule of law? Perhaps Byrne needs to share that insight with Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

That should fly about as well as Jeff Sessions' claim to have been a non-partisan attorney general.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

Being at the center of all that Alabama corruption has eaten at Sessions' brain.

Anonymous said...

Sessions probably shuts off what's left of his brain when he speaks to these GOP groups.

Anonymous said...

It's possible Sessions and Byrne have brain disease, but it's more likely they are suffering from a condition known as "Republican Red Meat Syndrome."

Anonymous said...

Sessions' took politics out of the DOJ? Right, I guess that's why be brought a clown like Matthew Whitaker onto the scene.

T-Rex said...

You don't need to prepare sensible remarks for the Republican red meat crowd. Sessions and Byrne learned that a long time ago.

Anonymous said...

Byrne is riding the Trump Train. If Trump said we need to end all cancer research, Byrne would say, "What a great idea!"

Anonymous said...

@9:58 --

Don't need no brain to ride the Trump train.

Anonymous said...

I am going to request to use your statement about brain wattage in a meeting around 2PM, permission to say it only. Great analogy!!

Anonymous said...

@9:58 --

I wonder how Byrne's strategy will work out if Trump is impeached or indicted.

Anonymous said...

"Is something eating at Jeff Sessions brain ………………." Maybe something to do with statues, or

could it be statutes, as in Title 15 section 3-5?

Anonymous said...

That bit about the Irish is the true, unvarnished Jeff Sessions. It shows he has a broad-based racism, not just about blacks.

Anonymous said...

Is there something in the drinking water in south Alabama? Both Sessions and Byrne come from down that way.

Anonymous said...

Well, it’s not like McCabe has any incentive to sensationalize accustions, given that he is trying to drive book sales.

So understanding your dislike of Jones, and knowing that the voters of Alabama will elect a Republican to the Senate in 2020, is there one potential R candidate that would be acceptable to you? Looking forward to your reply.

legalschnauzer said...

@10:34 --

You don't really need my permission, but you got it. Hope the meeting goes well.

legalschnauzer said...

@8:14 --

I can't say, given that the field is a long way from being complete. I will not support, or vote for, Doug Jones under any circumstances. So, that means I likely will have to consider Republicans, something I normally would not do. Will one be acceptable to me? Maybe, but I don't know at this point.

legalschnauzer said...

@12:58 --

Are you referring to the U.S. Code? Can you provide more clarity on your citation?