Leaderboard 728 X 90

Friday, December 14, 2012

Employee Suicide At Federal Courthouse Rekindles Memories Of My Days As A "Security Risk"

The scene yesterday at
Hugo Black Courthouse

For about an eight-month period beginning in May 2010, security personnel tailed me every time I visited the Hugo L. Black United States Courthouse in downtown Birmingham. If I went to the clerk's office, a security officer would take up residence right outside the door or a little ways down the hallway. If I went to the restroom, an officer suddenly had to relieve himself, too.

Memories of that period came flooding back yesterday when news broke that a courthouse employee had shot and killed himself in the clerk's office. David Lee Williams, 50, was the director of building services at the courthouse. At about 9:30 a.m. yesterday, Williams walked into the office of Clerk of Court Sharon Harris, pulled out a gun and shot himself in the head. He was pronounced dead about a half hour later at UAB Hospital.

How could anyone, even an employee, sneak a gun into a facility where weapons are strictly prohibited and metal detectors are present at all entrances? Did Williams regularly take a gun into the workplace or was this a one-time event? Why did Williams kill himself at work? Why did he go into Harris' office to shoot himself?  Was Williams suffering from mental illness and personal problems, or did issues in the workplace contribute to his demise?

We don't have answers to those questions at this hour. But the event hit home because I've spent way more hours than I care to remember in that courthouse, all because of the various legal issues that are at the heart of this blog. This question quickly came to mind yesterday: If courthouse security had spent less time tailing me, would they have been more likely to notice that one of their co-workers actually posed a threat to public safety?

The vast majority of my time at the Hugo Black Building has been spent on the first floor, in the public area of the clerk's office to the left as you take the front entrance--with an occasional pit stop at the men's room, which is just to the right of the entrance.

I've been upstairs to various courtrooms on maybe a half dozen occasions--once when I was called to jury duty, once when I attended a trial for a discrimination claim that former medical trainee Seema Gupta had filed against UAB, and about four times when U.S. District Judge William M. Acker Jr. conducted docket hearings during my employment lawsuit against UAB.

But probably 98 percent of my time in the building has been spent in the clerk's office--filing documents in various cases involving me, Mrs. Schnauzer, or both of us; or checking records on public computers. I don't recall seeing Sharon Harris' office, site of yesterday's fatal shooting. But I'm guessing it's somewhere behind the glass-encased front counter, just a few steps from where I've conducted my business.

How did I, without even a serious traffic violation on my record, come to the attention of courthouse security? In a general sense, I suspect it's partly because I became recognized as that guy who writes the inconvenient truth about judges. But my life as a "suspicious character" has more specific origins than that.

In May 2010, U.S. District Judge Abdul Kallon issued an order granting summary judgment to defendants in our case alleging unlawful actions by various debt collectors. Kallon's ruling was pure horse feces, in part because the defendants had stonewalled us on discovery, and we had notified the court that a number of discovery issues were outstanding and summary judgment could not even lawfully be considered, much less granted.

Much to my regret, we were represented at the time by a couple of con men--I mean attorneys--named Allan Armstrong and Darrell Cartwright. When Armstrong forwarded me a copy of the order, he didn't bother to give any warning about its contents; state that it was incorrect under the law; or note that we could file a Rule 59 motion to amend, seeking to have it overturned.

David Lee Williams
Armstrong's only message was that he had just received the order, had not had a chance to review it, but I should read it. With nothing to buffer me from what was ahead, I began to seethe as I read it. I responded to Armstrong with a message that expressed my anger and displeasure in blunt terms.

I didn't say anything threatening about Kallon or anyone else. But I did use language that was more harsh than usual because I knew that Armstrong was my lawyer, and our communication was protected by attorney-client privilege. He supposedly was representing the best interests for my wife and me, so I wanted him to know in no uncertain terms that we were extremely unhappy with this result and that we knew Kallon had cheated us.

What did Armstrong do? He proceeded to violate attorney-client privilege by forwarding my e-mail to the U.S. marshals service. A couple of guys showed up at our house later that afternoon, said they were from the U.S. marshals office, and wanted to talk with me about my e-mail.

Mrs. Schnauzer and I must have spoken to them for about an hour while standing in our front yard. They actually seemed to be nice guys and treated us in a professional manner. When I asked them how they came to be in possession of an e-mail that was protected by attorney-client privilege, they didn't have a good answer.

Under Rule 1.6(b)(1) of the Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct (Confidentiality of Information), a lawyer can reveal privileged information only "to prevent the client from committing a criminal act that the lawyer believes is likely to result in imminent death or substantial bodily harm."

My e-mail contained no statements pointing remotely to a criminal act of any sort, much less one likely to result in imminent or substantial harm to Kallon or anyone else. The U.S. marshal guys seemed to acknowledge that early on in our conversation.

Kallon happens to be black, having grown up in the African nation of Sierra Leone, and I suspect the marshals were dispensed to our home mainly to determine if it housed a couple of racists. Anyone who has spent any time reading this blog should know that is preposterous. In fact, one of my first statements to the marshals was that, if I seemed particularly angry toward Kallon, it's because my wife and I had voted for Barack Obama, the Democratic president who had nominated him. "We expect to get screwed by a judge who was appointed by a Republican," I told them. "But we voted for Obama, and we expect better than this from someone appointed by a Democrat."

The marshals seemed to be taken aback by our confession that we were white, suburbanites in Alabama who had voted for Barack Obama. They gathered themselves to point at two or three lines in the e-mail  and say, "What does this mean?"

I said, "It means exactly what it says. It says Kallon butchered the ruling, he probably did it intentionally to protect corporate interests, and I'm highly pissed off about it--especially when you consider that I voted for, and encouraged other people to vote for, the man who appointed him."

The marshals pondered that a moment, and I said, "Do you see a threat in there?" They shrugged their shoulders. "Is there something unlawful about voicing your displeasure, to your own lawyer, when a judge rules in a way that is contrary to law?" They shrugged their shoulders again.

Once we established that they had no real reason to be at our house, we had a pleasant conversation with them before saying our goodbyes. They left by giving us the impression that neither of us was seen as a threat to national security.

But that wasn't the end of it. Every time I visited the federal courthouse for about the next eight months, I would notice a security type following me everywhere I went. Given that I didn't go anywhere other than the clerk's office or the restroom, it was not a strenuous task.

At first, I decided to take the "I'll just ignore it" approach. But once or twice, Mrs. Schnauzer went with me to the courthouse, and they followed her, too. Given that we were only there because we could not find a lawyer to be trusted with our cases, and thus had to represent ourselves, I decided I'd had enough.

I called one of the marshals who had visited our home and told him about what we were experiencing. "When you were at our house, you indicated there was no reason for us to be seen as security risks, so we are getting tired of having someone shadow us every time we set foot in the federal courthouse."

He expressed surprise this was happening and promised to look into it. Apparently he did because the people stopped following us shortly after that. For quite some time now, I've been able to visit the courthouse, conduct my business, and leave, without feeling I was seen as some sort of shadowy figure.

As for yesterday's shooting, I'm thankful that only one person was physically harmed, and I feel bad about whatever demons drove David Lee Williams to take his own life. But I had to guffaw at the headline on one al.com article about the incident. Written by Kyle Whitmire, it was titled "Inside the Hugo Black Federal Courthouse, Justice Rolls On." The general theme was, "Hey, an employee suicide isn't going to stop us from the noble cause of dispensing justice."

Mr. Whitmire needs to remove his rose-colored journalist's glasses and realize his piece is an utter crock. For the most part, justice hasn't even started in that courthouse, so it certainly isn't going to "roll on." Experience has taught me that the corruption often starts in the clerk's office, where the notion that judges receive cases on random assignment is a joke.

When I filed my lawsuit against UAB, the woman in the clerk's office read a significant portion of the complaint, checked a white folder multiple times, and ultimately took 10 to 15 minutes before stamping it as being with Judge Acker. That is random assignment? I don't think so. Her actions indicate she assigned it to Judge Acker for a specific reason.

I later discovered a whistleblower case that a woman named Ingrid Awtrey Law had filed against Performance Group LLC, a physical therapy company owned in part by Homewood attorney Rob Riley, the son of former Governor Bob Riley. The case alleged rampant Medicare fraud in the company, and it also wound up with Acker.

There is no doubt that my unlawful termination at UAB was driven by the Riley family; loads of evidence points in that direction. Ingrid Law's complaint provides page after page of details about fraud on Rob Riley's watch.

What happened in both cases? Both wound up with Acker, an 84-year-old Reagan appointee, and he violated simple procedural law to dismiss both of them, without prejudice.

Is William Acker the designated protector for the Riley family and their buddies at big downtown law firms such as Bradley Arant and Haskell Slaughter? The answer, in my mind, is undoubtedly yes.

Was David Lee Williams aware that he worked in a fundamentally corrupt environment, and that much of the sleaze flows from the clerk's office? Did that contribute, in perhaps a slight way, to the mental distress that caused him to take his own life--in, ironically, the clerk's office?

I probably will never know the answer to that question. But the Hugo Black Courthouse is filled with people who have shaky ethics and priorities that are badly out of alignment. Most of the ugliness stays under wraps, with the public unaware of how its tax dollars are misspent.

In an indirect, tragic way, David Lee Williams shined a little light on the scene yesterday--for those who are willing to pay attention.


Anonymous said...

Very sad story about what happened with this fellow. And amazing to hear that security followed you around like that, for no valid reason.

Spasmoda said...

LS, anyone who reports factually about these corruption-filled courthouses probably would be seen as a security risk. Glad you stood up to them.

Anonymous said...

The location of a suicide usually has meaning. I would like to know why he killed himself at work.

Raymond said...

If I were you, I would be highly pissed at that lawyer.

legalschnauzer said...


I was--and I am.

Anonymous said...

I agree withh anon 10:16. There is. Probably a lot more to this story than being reported.

legalschnauzer said...

I'm guessing this will be reported much like the Major Bashinsky story. I look for al.com to take a "let's move along" approach.

Anonymous said...

Are you saying you don't think this was a suicide?

legalschnauzer said...

Anon at 10:36--

No, that's not what I mean, and sorry for not being very clear. There is a lot of doubt about whether Major Bashinsky killed himself, and I don't see that here. But I do think there are some important questions about what happened with Mr. Williams that probably will never be answered in the MSM. That's because the questions would cause discomfort in the legal-industrial complex. That's what I mean re: the similarities to the Bashinsky case. All sorts of key questions about Bashinsky seemingly were never raised by the MSM. If they were raised, the answers weren't reported.

Anonymous said...

Can a lawyer get disbarred for violating attorney-client privilege?

legalschnauzer said...

I'm fixin' to find out.

Anonymous said...

Your trips to the courthouse sound like an episode of "Get Smart."

legalschnauzer said...

Anon at 11:30--

Wish I'd had a shoe phone!

Anonymous said...

Would be interested in seeing the e-mail you wrote.

legalschnauzer said...

Anon at 12:17--

My life is pretty much an open book on this blog, but I'm not going to publish confidential communications between me and my lawyer. I'm sure you wouldn't do that either.

For one, it would be waiving attorney-client privilege. The lawyer in this case already has violated privilege, but I'm not going to waive my rights under the law. It's hard for me to object to his actions if I don't treat privilege seriously myself.

Second, the document might be part of pending litigation, a legal-malpractice case that my wife and I have brought, and we undoubtedly will be filing it in a bar complaint.

If you want to check with the U.S. marshals office and see if they will give you a copy, feel free.

Anonymous said...

LS, very sad day for America, shootings in New York and then this man who allegedly took his own life?

Can't tell with the psycho drugs that people take and then the CIA with all the hydra headed psycho "secret police," the poor man may have been a "sleeper cell."

We shall know some day what this time was-is, history isn't kind to the empires that fail and U.S. of A. is no exception to the true rule of the truth be told in the annals of history.

Of course the U.S. marshals' office STALKED YOU.

It is called STALKING and the U.S. marshals office is not paid to stalk. This entity has absolutely no business working for the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL CRIMINAL CREDITORS' IMPERIAL JUDICIAL.

You were lucky they did not entrap you, in my case I had a court case in another state from where the U.S. marshal stalked me AND so I filed a protective order. Interesting how the business of stalking didn't work out for the MICCIJ.

Stay centered and keep on blogging, you make the biggest difference in the AL NEWS.

I SAY IT IS ABOUT DRONE SURVEILLANCE, meaning the DRONES ARE BEING PUSHED INTO OUR SKIES and what better way for the "Police" to SEE U.S. of A. ALL via drones, this is the new portfolio worth billions to the MICCIJ.

Anonymous said...

It was a gun snuck into a federal courthouse in Birmingham yesterday, guns snuck into a Connecticut school today. What will it be tomorrow?

Anonymous said...

I think we all know where this is headed. Punish the whole because of a few. That's all the media is reporting is gun violence the last few days.

jeffrey spruill said...

At least you didn't have those WEENY-that's right WEENY- U.S. marshals following you around.

legalschnauzer said...


I think it was folks from the U.S. marshals office in some cases. Other times, it was a guy wearing a blue blazer, which is courthouse security. It seemed to vary, but the marshals office is in that building, at least one of them.

Anonymous said...

Correction on shooting in NY, it was the school in Connecticut.

I believe this is about gun control. Obama is not exactly the best choice for America, regardless of the Romney criminal.

The Romney criminals know it's an imposter in the highest power in the U.S. with respect to choosing the next round of judges forever.

DRONES are in our skies flying and we have not been told this is going to be the NEW POLICING policies and without true testing in the skies. Failures in the Middle East so bring it on home, just like Agent Orange in our skies from the Vietnam days.

Anonymous said...

"... (Newton, Ct) At least 27 people were murdered (including 18 children) at Newton Elementary in Connecticut Friday during a staged false flag attack against our guns when multiple shooters were initially reported opening up fire in an elementary school resulting in one of the worst mass shootings in U.S. history. This comes after a series of shooting rampages spreading across the country taking place in mostly white, suburban areas.

.. Within minutes of the reported shooting CNN had a police officer on calling for neurological screening for firearm purchases. Witnesses report at least 100 rounds were fired inside of the school from 2 gunmen. One of the gunmen was reported killed and the other was arrested in the woods just outside of the school. The one shooter in custody was reported to have multiple weapons and body armour according to fox news. CNN reports the gunman looked directly at one of the parents while being escorted to a police car and said "I DID NOT DO IT".


Anonymous said...

"... US is truly collapsing
Dec 15, 2012 10:0 AM
US under Zionist control is already in full spectrum meldown due to warmongering, greed, plunder, mass murder and crimes, a deadbeat economy and total moral decay. The US is an arrogant deceitful thug that thumps its chest and murders civilians abroad while its own corrupt society collapses.

"... The last head of state of the former Soviet Union, Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, has warned the US of an imminent Soviet-like collapse if Washington persists with its hegemonic policies.

.. Speaking at a Thursday conference on the future of the Middle East and the Black Sea region in the Turkish city of Istanbul, Gorbachev noted that disintegration was the atonement that the former Soviet Union made for its mistakes and the same fate awaits the US if Washington continues to repeat similar blunders.


Anonymous said...

Why Campus Crest?

"... After 1935 New Zealand used such loans - for hydropower schemes, railways, state housing etc. - and had a remarkably prosperous period to the 1970s when the loans were stopped. People should ask why the example of the New Zealand is not being followed. At an interest rate of only 1%, hydroelectric projects and public housing were financed. Why not today?

.. Figures contained in a 1998 study by Northeast Ohio Employee Ownership Center, Kent State University, Ohio and a 2005 study from the Center for Economic and Social Justice, Washington, D.C., indicate (2005 figures) that, aged sixty five, an adult would have a binary income of about $26,000 and a capital accumulation of at least $200,000 with both figures continuing to increase after the age of sixty five.

.. Cement Works in Norway
By using national bank-issued interest-free loans, a large company/corporation would get cheap money as long as new binary shareholders are created. The key point is that the cost, at the very least, is being halved while, at the same time, the ownership of productive capacity is being spread.


Anonymous said...

LS, for your investigative reporting to share with AL ~

"... Who really killed the Connecticut children? ..

.. Sheriff Pat Sullivan, who ran the Columbine investigation, was arrested last year and convicted of coercing sexual favors from a child in exchange for methamphetamine. His ridiculously short sentence, served in the jail that bears his name, amounted to a slap on the wrist. Rumor has it that Sullivan is part of a pedophile network along the lines of the Finders of Lost Children and the perpetrators of the Franklin Scandal child sex ring...."


Anonymous said...

"Walsh Butt Rape,"


Anonymous said...

"... At this point in my opinion, the only difference between Rod Westmoreland’s guilt or innocents, is just a matter of hours. Did he really arrive in Boulder at the time that he says he did? Or was he already in Boulder prior to when he says he was, committing this crime? Because all of the other clues seem to point to him as being the strongest suspect. Once I finally determined Rod Westmoreland’s name, which would have been in November of 2005, I immediately sent Professor Michael Tracey a series of emails detailing my concerns about Rod Westmoreland. And he did respond to all of them, but didn’t say much. But what he did say was that he would forward the information to Detective Lou Smit, and I thanked him for it. Unknown to me at that time, but known to me now, is that Professor Tracey had other ideas of his own as to who the killer was, because he had already been talking with John Karr for the past 3 years. So he had plans, and he had a book to coincide with the arrest. And at this point I really doubt if he ever forwarded my information to the police. Which is why I also sent numerous emails to the Boulder DA expressing my concerns about Rod Westmoreland. They only responded with a general email that they send everyone, and never asked me 1 question about my theory....

“The Fat Cats”


Columbine Family request says:
April 14, 2009 at 12:10 pm

Please contact us. We have information that ties the Fat Cats to a child trafficking gang called the Fat Cats.


Anonymous said...

"Why Johnny Can't Come Home"

Highlights from the FRANKLIN-COVER-UP Scandal

Franklin Credit Union was established in Omaha, Nebraska, in the latter part of 1968 to appease the civil rights movement, in an effort to remove institutional discrimination so minorities could more easily obtain loans. In 1970 a 300 pound black man, a Lawrence E. King, Jr., became the CEO of Franklin Credit Union. In 1988 the credit union was jointly raided by the IRS and the FBI and subsequently shut down. It was soon discovered that thirty-nine million dollars was missing from the Credit Union vaults. In May of 1989 King, a prominent Republican operative, was indicted by a Federal Grand Jury. He was summarily tried and found guilty of "fraud and income tax evasion directly related to the Franklin Credit Union", notes Ted Gunderson, a retired FBI agent who eventually became involved as a private investigator on the Johnny Gosch case. King served his prison term, but reliable sources say he is back in Washington, D.C. and, once again, working as a political operative in elite Republican circles. A major unresolved problem with King is that he never served time, nor was he ever even indicted for what most would agree are much more heinous and egregious crimes than the acknowledged crimes that sent him to prison. Let me explain.

Unknown to many, the Franklin Credit Union was also found to have been a cover for a money laundering operation related to "drugs, sexual misconduct, child abuse, pornography, even Satanic activity" ( from the Gunderson files and The Franklin Cover-up by John DeCamp). Many prominent people were alleged to have participated in these reprehensible, albeit hidden crimes. The FBI was said to have confiscated from the Credit Union such incriminating paraphernalia as: child pornography, illicit video tapes, and other evidence of a satanic nature. It was discovered that the North American Man Boy Love Association (N.A.M.B.L.A) deposited five million dollars in the credit union under the guise of "The Church of the Beloved Disciple." According to Webster G. Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin in their book, "George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography", Chapter XXI - Omaha, "Social workers and state child care administrators accused King of running a child prostitution ring".

The evidence uncovered by the FBI was credible enough for the Nebraska State Legislature to organize a special committee in January of 1989 to explore the shocking allegations. Based on the committee's findings, a County Grand Jury was convened in March of 1990. Although the Grand Jury heard testimony that corroborated their worst fears and the worst possible case scenario, " the grand jury issued an unusual and unprecedented report throwing out all of the allegations concerning sexual child abuse," Gunderson reports. Furthermore, according to the book, "Why Johnny Can't Come Home" By Noreen Gosch, the Nebraska Leadership Conference published a book called " A Carefully Crafted Hoax." It was an oddly ironic title because it actually presented a rather sober and detailed report about the widespread sexual abuse of children, satanism, and all the other allegations that had surfaced during the Franklin Credit Union debacle.

Anonymous said...

FindLaw, Legal Professional News


Wordpress.com: United Nation 1 month ago

Exposing U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice and Her Zionist Links

The problem with the United Nations, is it’s charter is modeled after the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic’s constitution.

Our statutes are modeled to support the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund as seen from this recent post on... Full Article at Wordpress.com: United Nation



Anonymous said...

"... On January 19, 1976, Marjorie S. Holt noted for the record, a second “Declaration Of INTER-dependence” and clearly identified the U.N. as a “Communist” organization, and that they were seeking both production and monetary control over the Union and People through International Organization promoting the “One World Order.” (See: Congressional Record, January 19, 1976, Extension of remarks; also see, 8 U.S.C.A. 1101 (40) , 50 U.S.C.A. 781 & 783). The socio/economic situation worsened as noted in the Complaint/Petition, filed in the U.S. Court of Claims, Docket No. 41-76, on February 11, 1976, by 44 Federal Judges, Atkins et al. vs. U.S.. Atkins et al. complained that “As a result of inflation, the compensation of federal judges has been substantially diminished each year since 1969, causing direct and continuing monetary harm to plaintiffs…the real value of the “dollar” (FRN’s) decreased by approximately 34.5 percent from March 15, 1969 to October 1, 1975….As a result, plaintiffs have suffered an unconstitutional deprivation of earnings”, and in the prayer for relief claimed “damages for the constitutional violations enumerated above, measured as the diminution of his earnings for the entire period since March 9, 1969.”

.. It is quite apparent that the persons holding and enjoying Offices of Public Trust, Honor and/or Profit knew of the emergency emergent problem and sought protection for themselves, to the damage and injury of the People and Children, who were classified as “a club that has many other members” who “have no remedy.”

.. And knowing that “heinous” acts had been committed, stated that they [judges/lawyers] would not apply the Law, nor would any substantive remedy be applied (“checked more or less, but never stopped”) “until all of us [judges] are dead.”

.. As stated in Senate Report 93-549: “Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency.

.. The “Introduction”, on page 1, begins with a phenomenal declaration, to wit: “A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency…”

.. According to the research done in 16 American Jurisprudence, 2nd Edition, Sections 71 and 82, no “emergency” justifies a violation of any Constitutional provision. Arguendo, “Supremacy Clause” and “Separation of Powers”, it is clearly admitted in Senate Report No. 93-549 that abridgment has in fact occurred.

~And that is the corruptible history of American finance over the past ninety plus years and the slippery slope of foreign manipulation and intervention by international banking interests who by their pre-meditated contrivance, have disassembled and subverted our Constitutional protections of the guarantee to protect and preserve the honest and substantive money of the America people, bringing upon our American shores in derogation of our Common Law, the statute merchants law of Admiralty process, and thereby, secretly move our country and its people under the badge of peonage imposed by the law merchant who by encroaching judicial precedent, establish an ever expanding condition of perpetual involuntary bankruptcy and the endless generational economic bondage of the wage slave!


Anonymous said...



Anonymous said...


Gestapo Bar Association & Gun Control


Our CONSTITUTION does not say LAWYER, ATTORNEY, or BAR ASSOCIATION. In fact, the framers of the Constitution left OUT the word lawyer/attorney as they DID NOT want them to have absolute control of the JUDICIAL SYSTEM of the UNITED STATES.

Where are we TODAY, December 2012, LAWYERS and their SECRET SOCIETY have ABSOLUTE 100% CONTROL of the Judicial System. There is NO LIBERTY and NO JUSTICE FOR ALL !!!!!!!!!!!!!

These so called experts in the law, had ALL the PROOF they needed to put a STOP to the insidious branding of this nations veterans with SECRET CODES of which, deprives them of DUE PROCESS OF LAW, i.e. LIBERTY.

DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE; “…….obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers “. Moreover, “……protecting them, by a mock Trial, from Punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States “. End quote’s.

CONSTITUTION of the UNITED STATES, ARTICLE II, “……right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed “.

The only thing keeping the Gestapo Bar Association and the black robe Nazi’s sitting behind the bench from taking absolute control of EVERYTHING is the guns to STOP THEM !!! They, lawyers, have EFFECTIVE CONTROL of the LEGISLATIVE BRANCH of GOVERNMENT !!! THINK, do you want a SECRET SOCIETY, which has NO HONOR, that’s why it secret to prevent anyone from looking inside at failure and stupidity controlling YOU and your FAMILY ????

What about all the deaths in the UNITED STATES by police officers who NEVER are arrested for murdering a citizen of this nation ?? I agree with one item, you do NOT need a machine gun to go HUNTING !! If you can’t hit game with ONE SHOT, you’ll learn to shoot better.

If you REALLY want to take away firearms, then lets play politics !! 70% of ALL LAWYERS SITTING BEHIND THE BENCH AS ALLEDGED JUDGES, ARE TO BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY, before ANY ADMENDMENT is voted on in this the UNITED STATES. Laypeople are to be sitting behind the bench, NOT LAWYERS !!

GIVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BACK LIBERTY and JUSTICE FOR ALL, and we will agree to give up CERTAIN FIREARMS, those for hunting and home protection STAY !!!!

A voice of reason speaks.

Anonymous said...


Lords of War and the Birth of a Multipolar World, by Johnny Punish

American corporations have to beg for capital from the cash-rich Sovereign Wealth Funds in the Persian Gulf. By invading Iraq, President George W. Bush grossly undermined American credibility in the international arena and irrevocably weakened Washington’s diplomatic clout.

Together, these historic shifts have provided an opportunity for the world to move from the tutelage of the sole superpower, America, to a multi-polar global order, one where America’s moral, economic, and military leadership will be profoundly challenged.

What form will this world resemble?
What are the perils and promises of this new power order?

In the amazing compelling book After Empire: The Birth of a Multipolar World, Author Dilip Hiro provides a realistic, challenging, and nuanced look at the emerging power politics of the coming century and considers how they are going to turn our world upside-down.

After Empire Author Discusses Merchants of Death on U.S. banned PRESSTV


Anonymous said...

Where's the "like" button?

Anonymous said...

Anon 5:27 is this the book Obama is holding in his hand as he is getting off the AF1 in that photo?

Anonymous said...


"... It would, of course, make sense these days for an aspiring musician to venture out to Los Angeles. But in those days, the centers of the music universe were Nashville, Detroit and New York. It wasn’t the industry that drew the Laurel Canyon crowd, you see, but rather the Laurel Canyon crowd that transformed Los Angeles into the epicenter of the music industry. To what then do we attribute this unprecedented gathering of future musical superstars in the hills above Los Angeles? What was it that inspired them all to head out west? Perhaps Neil Young said it best when he told an interviewer that he couldn’t really say why he headed out to LA circa 1966; he and others “were just going like Lemmings.”

.. Inside The LC: The Strange but Mostly True Story of Laurel Canyon and the Birth of the Hippie Generation, Part I, May 8, 2008

"There’s something happening here
What it is ain’t exactly clear"

.. Join me now, if you have the time, as we take a stroll down memory lane to a time nearly four-and-a-half decades ago – a time when America last had uniformed ground troops fighting a sustained and bloody battle to impose, uhmm, ‘democracy’ on a sovereign nation.


Anonymous said...


"... To the vast majority of Americans, the name Marc Dutroux does not mean much. Drop that name in Belgium though and you are likely to elicit some very visceral reactions. Dutroux—convicted along with his wife in 1989 for the rape and violent abuse of five young girls, the youngest of whom was just eleven—now stands accused of being a key player in an international child prostitution and pornography ring whose practices included kidnapping, rape, sadistic torture,and murder. Dutroux was sentenced in 1989 to thirteen years for his crimes, but was freed after having served just three. This was in spite of the fact that, as prison governor Yvan Stuaert would later tell a parliamentary commission: “A medical report described him as a perverse psychopath, an explosive mix. He was an evident danger to society.” The man who turned Dutroux loose on society, Justice Minister Melchior Wathelet, was rewarded with a prestigious appointment to serve as a judge at the European Court of Justice at The Hague.

“From our comfortable seat in life…we never could have imagined that thousands of well-off adults, integrated and even cultured, find pleasure in seeing children tortured and killed.”
—From a front-page editorial in Italy’s Corriere della Sera
(reprinted in The Irish Times, September 29, 2000 ....


..“In the early 1950’s the CIA was looking for ‘specially gifted subjects’ to study ‘dissociative states,’ which could be ‘induced and controlled to some extent with hypnosis and drugs.’”

—Arlene Tyner, writing in
Probe magazine, July/August 2000


Anonymous said...

There is a winner and a loser in every lawsuit. It seems to me that Mr. Schnauzer is bitter because he lost in his lawsuit. Attorney-client privilege is waived when the receiver of the privileged communication feels that a threat has been made. It is that person's duty to contact the Marshal's Office. If Mr. Schnauzer is not happy with his representation, contact the Bar and lodge a complaint. None of his rantings have anything to do with the tortured soul who took his life for reasons only known to him.

legalschnauzer said...

Anon at 12:12--

You might try reading the Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct, and the relevant part is cited in the post. You clearly don't know what you are talking about.

Hope Knows Your Name said...

If you would all like to know the truth as to why my husband killed himself in the courthouse you can read the whole story in my book called hope knows your name. You can purchase my book at www.hopeknowsyourname.com and yes there was a reason why he did it in his bosses office that is in my book also. The people at the courthouse would not even let me come there to talk to them so they don't even know the whole story of why he killed himself...but I do.