Revelations about Graham Platner's Nazi tattoo and misconduct with women suggests Dems who defend him sound like Republicans defending Donald Trump

As the list of scandals connected to Graham Platner continues to grow, one veteran Democratic aide in the U.S. Senate has described the party's mood as "apoplectic." The willingness of some prominent Dems to overlook the downsides of a deeply flawed candidate brings another adjective to mind -- and that is "Trumpian."

Will Democrats who choose to stand behind Platner, seemingly at all costs, prove to have made a wise call? We won't have to wait long to find out; the primary in Maine, which is attracting voluminous media coverage, is tomorrow.

Even Americans who have tended not to give Maine much thought should be thinking about it now. That's because the Democratic Party has become more than the home of progressive and liberal ideas. It is our only functional political party -- the only one capable of governing, the only one with even a serious interest in governing. Republicans long ago abandoned any such ideals, turning their party over to a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist who has credibly been accused of acts that could amount to "crimes against humanity." Also, a tipster stated in an FBI document that longtime TV host Robin Leach strangled a girl at a sex party on a Trump property, with the victim's body buried on a Trump golf course.

Now Democrats seem willing to ditch the moral high ground for a candidate who is not worth it and clearly is not qualified to serve in the U.S. Senate -- no matter how well he polls in Maine.

Politico examines these issues and more under the headline "Democrats are furious after latest Platner revelations." A subhead reads "A New York Times report with new allegations about the Democrat's Nazi symbol tattoo and his conduct with women has the party freaking out over its Maine Senate chances."

Democrats have no one but themselves to blame for the Platner-induced quandary in which they find themselves. They should have rejected his candidacy months ago -- not only because of the scandals but because he has no high level or elected experience in government, providing no reason to believe he can serve effectively in the U.S. Senate. Too many Dems have taken the approach of "We simply must win this race in Maine and finally eject Republican Susan Collins from the U.S. Senate, so we will overlook our guy's flaws and saddle up on a gimpy thoroughbred to ride in the political equivalent of the Kentucky Derby." That's the kind of short-term GOPesque thinking that gave the world Donald Trump. To see Democrats stoop to that level is disheartening for those who believe in the party, and it could be borderline tragic for the country. 

Platner has cast himself as an anti-establishment candidate, with supporters willing to take on both Republicans and Democratic Party kingmakers. This is from the Politico report:

Democrats are at each other’s throats about Graham Platner after his latest scandal. They don’t know what to do about it.

The New York Times released a report Thursday with disturbing accounts from several of Platner’s ex-girlfriends, just days before he is set to win the Democratic nomination to face GOP Sen. Susan Collins in Maine, a critical Senate battleground. One woman described Platner grabbing her in ways that left marks and once locking her in a room. She also claimed he knew that his tattoo resembled a Nazi symbol when he got it — something he has repeatedly denied.

The report — on the heels of last week’s news that Platner had sexted other women while married — left Democrats torn. Some view Platner, whose campaign has persisted despite a series of scandals, as their only chance to take down Collins. He continuously led Democratic Gov. Janet Mills in primary polling before she suspended her campaign in April, and has led the Republican senator in public head-to-head polls.

Several observers have stated that Democrats are taking the most convenient path, siding with a candidate they think can win, while pushing ethical considerations out of view. In other words, they are starting to act like Republicans. From Politico:

“Several donors I know are still all-in for Platner because he’s not Susan Collins and he’s a Democrat,” said Alex Hoffman, a Democratic strategist and donor adviser. “The line that keeps being thrown around is the double standard that exists between Republicans and Democrats, where if this was a Republican, they’d all be getting behind him.”

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who campaigned with Platner on Friday, reiterated his support. And some Democrats online were quick to cast the ex-girlfriend of Platner who spoke on record to The Times, Lyndsey Fifield, as a partisan activist because she has worked in Republican politics.

How did Graham Platner reach a level of prominence in national politics? A TIME magazine profile  

provides details. It's an intriguing, improbable story, but some observers sense Dems are attaching their hopes to the wrong wagon. From Politico:

[Some have] warned that [Platner’s] a loose cannon and there’s no predicting what other information about his past will spill into public view. What has already come to light, they argued, might already be enough to sink his candidacy, not to mention undermine the party’s core values.

“Democrats in Maine and throughout the country have got to decide what is their priority: Justifying Graham Platner’s behavior or winning the Democratic seat in Maine,” said Robert Zimmerman, a New York-based Democratic National Committee member. “It’s very clear that Platner has not been able to credibly justify his conduct and Democrats who defend him sound like Republicans defending Donald Trump after the Access Hollywood tape.”

Ouch! That highlighted section is painful to read because it is so on point -- and it should prompt serious self-reflection in the Democratic Party and beyond. Some Dems, meanwhile, are having second thoughts about allowing a "win-at-all-costs approach" to overtake their core values -- especially since theirs is the only U.S. party that still has core values. From Politico:

Winning Maine is all but a necessity for Democrats’ chances of taking back the Senate this fall. Collins is the only Republican senator up for reelection this year in a state former Vice President Kamala Harris won in 2024. If Democrats can’t knock her off, they’d have to win a far redder state, such as Iowa or Texas, to get control of the upper chamber.

Platner, on MSNOW on Thursday just hours after The Times published its story, denied the allegations of violence and said they were coming from someone who’s “politically motivated.” He said he has “not once” considered dropping out of the race.

“My journey is one of transformation. And I’m very happy to talk about that earlier part in my life. And I have no doubt that people will attempt to continue to revisit Reddit posts, continue to try to revisit parts of my past,” Platner said, referring to his previously unearthed offensive posts. “But I think what’s really important to note here is that these are things that I talk about in my past — things that I am not proud of — but it is a past that I had to go through to get where I am today.”

Platner said he did not have any communication Thursday with the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee about exiting the race and making way for another candidate. And he said “I expect that we will not” because of the “outpouring of support” he has received.

However, some donors — even those who had previously opened their checkbooks for Platner — are starting to grow skittish.

“He’s now below the bar for my client group,” said one national donor adviser, who is telling their clients to send their money to other battleground Senate races instead. 

The most recent New York Times story has splintered Democrats into warring factions -- at a time when party resources and energy should be focused on fighting Trump, not each other . . . 

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who had recruited Mills to run, was silent when asked several questions about the Platner revelations in the Capitol halls by reporters Thursday.

“There is dramatically higher concern about losing Maine now across the caucus than there was before the stories broke,” said one senior Democratic Senate aide who, like others in this article, was granted anonymity to speak candidly. “Everyone realizes that without Maine the path to taking back the Senate is impossible.”

The aide added: “Everyone is apoplectic.”

But there was also frustration among some Democratic donors and operatives Thursday that the party was again cannibalizing one of its own, further jeopardizing its chances in what was already an uphill battle against a longtime GOP incumbent.

A Democratic consultant close to many of the party’s biggest donors said the sentiment among them has been that they don’t care about Platner’s scandals. Citing a conversation with a major donor who sits on the finance committee of one of the Democratic Party’s main national campaign arms, the consultant said he does not think that sentiment will change after The Times story.

“We don’t care. I think that’s the case for many donors. Anybody who beats Susan Collins will do,” said the consultant. The consultant attributed the indifference to the fact that it’s the “Trump era,” when allegations of wrongdoing simply don’t weigh as heavily as they once used to.

Are some Democrats leaning toward becoming a slightly different version of the Republican Party? It sounds that way to me, and I find it extraordinarily wrongheaded. Consider the case of Ro Khanna (D-CA), who as co-sponsor of the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA), took a principled stand about shining light on bad behavior in politics.  Now, he risks throwing that away by standing beside Graham Platner:

Platner was set to rally in Bar Harbor, Maine, on Friday with Khanna, who has endorsed him, and alongside Maine 2nd District candidate Matt Dunlap and gubernatorial candidate Troy Jackson. Representatives for all three said the event was still set to go.

“The behavior described in The New York Times story was wrong and toxic. Graham has acknowledged that and sought redemption,” Khanna said in a statement Thursday. “The people of Maine deserve a senator who is going to stand up to the billionaire class, against genocide, and for the working class.”

Platner is all but certain to win Maine’s Democratic primary on Tuesday over Mills and 2024 Democratic Senate candidate David Costello. After that, Maine law allows the state party to replace Platner with another Democrat if he stepped down before mid-July. Such a move would be unprecedented in the state’s politics.

Some observers warn that Democrats could face serious blowback for casting aside their core values:

The Times report follows revelations last weekend that Platner had exchanged sexual messages with women other than his wife after they were married — which had already reignited Democratic fears that he could tank hard in November.

Platner, a political newcomer, has been dogged by scandals since the fall, when his Reddit history revealed a series of offensive posts suggesting, among other things, that victims of sexual assault should take more responsibility and that white rural Americans are stupid. Platner apologized for the posts, saying he was in a dark place at the time, and owned up to having a tattoo that resembles a Nazi symbol, though he said he didn’t realize the meaning at the time he got it and later had it covered. 

The Times report reignited the controversy over Platner’s tattoo: Fifield told the paper he had referred to it as “my Totenkopf” while they were dating and knew about its Nazi connection.

“This is the most important seat for the next Democratic president to have a trifecta to act and accomplish all the things that all the people in the Democratic Party believe in — health care, child care, climate,” said Brian Romick, president of Democratic Majority for Israel. “And now we’re in a position where someone with a Nazi tattoo, inappropriate relationships with women, and racist Reddit posts is our person. And people need to answer for that.”

Cheyenne Hunt, founder of Reckoning Action and former Executive Director of Gen Z For Change, who had organized against former Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) over allegations of sexual assault, rescinded her endorsement of Platner on Thursday.

“We have the responsibility to do what is right even when it’s politically inconvenient,” she said in a video posted on social media. “Women cannot be an acceptable sacrifice for the next election.”