 |
| Students on the Alabama A&M campus |
Members of the Alabama A&M board of trustees seemingly do not care that President Daniel K. Wims' checkered past and shaky present have resulted in a string of unflattering press reports that could threaten the university's future, according to a report today at donaldwatkins.com. In fact, it's almost as if the trustees are engaging in a show of solidarity to protect Wims, despite the mounting evidence that his leadership at the Huntsville-based institution has been weak, at best.
Donald Watkins, longtime Alabama attorney who has become a leading voice in online investigative journalism, writes under the headline "Alabama A&M Trustees Form a Human Shield Around Embattled President Daniel K. Wims":
In the wake of recent media reports about embattled Alabama A&M University President Daniel K. Wims' failed leadership, a majority of the university's board of trustees has formed a human shield of sorts around Wims. These trustees include Roderick D. Watts (chairman of the board), Kevin Ball, Tiffany Johnson Cole, Richard Crunkleton, Ralph Williams, Scherrie Banks Pickett, John Hackett, Jr., and Elizabeth B. Richardson.
Two of the trustees -- Nichelle Gainey and Ginger Harper -- voted against Wims' appointment to the presidency in October 2021. This puts them on the right side of history.
Gov. Kay Ivey, who serves as president of the board by virtue of her office, has already extracted from Dr. Wims what was important to her – a de facto waiver of collection activities relating to the $527,280,064 debt owed by the state of Alabama to the university. As long as Alabama A&M does not pose a competitive threat to the University of Alabama in Huntsville's (UAH) growth and prosperity, Ivey is fine with Wims remaining in the presidency.
In other words, it does not matter how bad A&M's president performs -- how much of an embarrassment he becomes -- as long as he doesn't mess with the majority-White university in town. That is what MAGA Republican leadership means in Alabama, as embodied by Kay Ivey, an avowed ever-Trumper.
Why do the president and the trustees matter at Alabama A&M -- or any other institution of higher learning? Watkins grew up with a father as a university president (Alabama State), so he has a wealth of insight on this question:
As president, Dr. Wims is the chief executive officer and public face of Alabama A&M University. By law, the trustees are the guardians of the public's trust and interest in the university and its educational affairs. They also oversee and supervise the conduct of the university's president.
For whatever reasons, the pro-Wims trustees do not appear to care whether Dr. Wims is an alleged sexual predator, or not. They do not seem to care whether Dr. Wims allegedly pressured male and female employees for sex, or not. They do not appear to care whether Dr. Wims obtained the presidency in 2021 under false pretenses in a "rigged" selection system, or not. They do not seem concerned about Wims' de facto waiver of the state’s $527,280,064 debt to Alabama A&M. And, they do not care that Dr. Wims is transforming Alabama A&M into a base camp for MAGA operatives.
The pro-Wims trustees are prepared to “ride or die” (figuratively speaking) with Dr. Wims, regardless of the amount of reputational damage and harm Wims’ continued presence on campus causes to Alabama A&M and the "victims" of his alleged sexual harassment.
Interestingly, not one of the 41,737 readers (as of November 4, 2023) who have viewed my published articles on Dr. Wims since October 8, 2023, has publicly or privately expressed any support for Wims' embattled presidency.
It appears that the pro-Wims trustees who are shielding him from public accountability for his actions as provost and president are completely out of touch with the public's lack of confidence in Dr. Wims' leadership.
The upcoming articles in this series of reports will introduce the public to new aspects of Dr. Wims’ suppressed history and checkered past that have evaded public exposure.
Stay tuned!
3 comments:
An insightful comment from Donald Watkins today on his Facebook page. You can learn a lot of history from reading Watkins' work, stuff I know I was never taught in a public school . . .
Donald V. Watkins
Emancipated slaves never got the "40 acres and a mule" to which Union Army General William T. Sherman proclaimed they were entitled in Special Field Order No. 15, issued on January 16, 1865. In the Fall of 1865, President Andrew Johnson rescinded Special Field Order No. 15, leaving freed slaves with nothing but their freedom. Today, Alabama A&M University Daniel K. Wims and the university's board of trustees are determined to make sure that this land grant institution never collects the $527, 280,064 that is due and owing Alabama A&M from the state of Alabama. The university's weak and compromised board of trustees, led by Chairman Roderick D. Watts of Gadsden, Alabama, has not presented, entertained, or passed a resolution authorizing the president to aggressively pursue collection of this debt. Meanwhile, Alabama A&M continues to aggressively pursue the collection of student debt from financially distress former students.
https://www.facebook.com/donald.v.watkins/posts/pfbid0nZhQZhDqiA4vntxyiLyJMrCPgJWRZ2rjDMoYBhzv7xUy1wwRVScpJDrZAGvrYyT5l?comment_id=234254486336037¬if_id=1699221501243000¬if_t=comment_mention&ref=notif
I learned about the Homestead Act, General Sherman's "40 Acres and a Mule" order being rescinded by President Andrew Johnson, and many other subjects from reading Donald Watkins' Web site. I grew up in Springfield, MO, and our town had good public schools. So why did they not teach these subjects? It might be because Springfield's town square was the site of a lynching of three Black men in 1906. I often wondered growing up, why I went to school with very few Black children. It's because their forebears had to the good sense to get out of town, probably fearing for their lives, after the 1906 lynchings.I didn't learn about the lynchings until about 2014 -- had never heard a hing about it. Learning of that horrible event answered a lot of questions about my hometown. A story about the 2016 lynchings is at this link. I've come to a realization: We are a brutal country now -- think of Jan. 6, 2001, the obscene numbers of gun deaths and mass shootings, and the number of people who support a wannabe dictator for president -- and we have been a brutal country for many, many decades.
https://oaahm.omeka.net/exhibits/show/exodus/ozarksraceriots/springfield
I learned about the Homestead Act, General Sherman's "40 Acres and a Mule" order being rescinded by President Andrew Johnson, and many other subjects from reading Donald Watkins' Web site. I grew up in Springfield, MO, and our town had good public schools. So why did they not teach these subjects? It might be because Springfield's town square was the site of a lynching of three Black men in 1906. I often wondered growing up, why I went to school with very few Black children. It's because their forebears had the good sense to get out of town, probably fearing for their lives, after the 1906 lynchings.I didn't learn about the lynchings until about 2014 -- had never heard a hing about it. Learning of that horrible event answered a lot of questions about my hometown. A story about the 2016 lynchings is at the link below. I've come to a realization: We are a brutal country now -- think of Jan. 6, 2001, the obscene numbers of gun deaths and mass shootings, and the number of people who support a wannabe dictator for president -- and we have been a brutal country for many, many decades.
https://oaahm.omeka.net/exhibits/show/exodus/ozarksraceriots/springfield
November 5, 2023 at 4:32 PM Delete
Post a Comment