 |
| Jefferson County Courthouse |
Joann Bashinsky, of the Golden Flake Snack Foods family, is not the only Alabama resident to become ensnared in a Jefferson County probate court that appears to revolve around a number of dubious actors -- including Judge Alan King, Conservator Greg Hawley, and Balch Bingham lawyer Amy Adams.
Susan Evans and her father, former baking industry executive James Belew, are going through a similar wrenching experience, as described by Apryl Marie Fogel at Alabama Today. Fogel begins by encouraging readers to walk in the footsteps of Evans and Belew:
Imagine you’ve done everything right to prepare your family for the realities that come with aging. You’ve created a power of attorney that specifically notes that your daughter is to be your conservator and guardian, should the need arise. You and your second wife have a prenup to protect your assets, and spell out the use of funds for your future. You think you’re ready.
Then the day that you and your family hoped never would come, does, and with advancing age, slight dementia begins. All that’s left to do is execute your pre-planned system.
Your daughter goes to court, documents in hand, but the judge won’t hear her case. It turns out that after the dementia sets in, the step-mother also had a power of attorney signed.
So the judge appoints a “temporary” conservator and a guardian ad litem until a full hearing can be held. The father tells the guardian ad litem he has chosen his daughter and wishes for her to be the conservator, but again the court refuses to listen.
Hearings come and hearings go, and the daughter’s voice is failed to be heard, her father’s wishes go unmet. What’s worse, in one hearing a witness tells the court the two family members have argued in front of the father, and the judge uses that as the basis to make the temporary conservatorship permanent. The witness statement — untrue according to the daughter. complete fiction.
Five years go by and the daughter still has not had her day in court. Meanwhile, the court-ordered conservator has been paid $15,000 plus expenses and is on track to be paid at a minimum another $15,000. Unless of course he can either wait it out or convince the family to liquidate assets such as selling property. Then he’s paid even more.
In addition, the costs of attorney fees for the family totals nearly $65,000 of which $55,000 is being paid out of the estate. Money that could and likely should have stayed with the family and estate, if not for the judge’s order.
How did the Evans case reach this point? Fogel provides details:
This is the story of Susan Evans and her father, James Belew.
Evans is the only child of Belew. Her mother, his first wife, passed away in 2008. He remarried in 2012. Belew was in the baking industry and was the general manager of the Dolly Madison Plant in Columbus, Ga. when he retired.
Evans, a mother of two and grandmother of one, just retired after 18 years at Viva Health.
The judge is none other than Jefferson County Probate Judge, Alan King.
The conservator is none other than veteran litigator and probate lawyer, Greg Hawley.
The witness whose alleged false and unconfirmed testimony caused the court to move the temporary conservatorship to permanent? Is none other than Hawley’s own assistant, Margaret Holland.
If you’ve been following along in this series those names will sound familiar. They’re the same two players involved in the Joann Bashinsky case. As a matter of fact, they’re the same players as a number of cases in Jefferson County, Alabama. I’ll be writing about more of these horror stories in the coming days. (Don’t worry, if you’re missing Hawley’s “friend” Amy Davis Adams from Balch Bingham, she too will return in several future installments of this series beginning later this week.)
Most Alabamians probably have no idea what transpires in the state's probate courts. But many of them likely will wind up there someday. Fogel, and the Evans case, provide a valuable lesson in the vulgar realities of some courts:
Evans is one of a handful of people who personally reached out to me after seeing my first story in this series. I’ve spoken to her several times. Her father’s case is as frustrating as the Bashinsky case because it was Evans herself who went to the court with no reason to doubt that the judge would hear her case and allow her to perform the role her father chose her for. Of course, that’s not what happened as Judge King seemingly went against her father’s expressed written and verbal wishes.
I want to bring attention to some specific points of her case and hopefully, I want to give you something you can do to help this family, yourselves, and others.
Individual judges have unquestionable amounts of power and discretion with little to no accountability
Evans echos the sentiments I’ve heard from a number of people wrapped up in the conservatorship system. It’s designed in such a way that the judge might as well be a God.
In her father’s case, Hawley’s guardianship was initially meant to be temporary. This is a familiar refrain from those with loved ones and family members involved. However, hearing after hearing, it became clear that unless something changed, Hawley will be Belew’s conservator for the rest of his life.
Lack of transparency and accountability
Until this week, after five years of Hawley being the conservator, Evans had not had a full accounting of her father’s assets or of the costs associated with the conservatorship. This week Holland provided that breakdown for the first time. You may remember Holland from the first post. Holland is the assistant who sent Bashinsky's confidential medical and financial documents to Adams “accidentally”.
It states, “Fees are based off of a percentage of the Estate which in total is roughly 9%. It is calculated only at a Partial and/or Final Settlement Hearing. This is an Alabama State Statute = 2.5% of what’s received, 2.5% of what’s disbursed and 4% attorney’s fees.”
As I mentioned, records indicate that thus far, $15,000 has been paid to Hawley’s firm.
The incestuous nature of the lawyers and those who work for them
One of the often unspoken problems faced by family members fighting the court orders is the closeness of the attorneys and judges involved in the cases. Evans has had two attorneys, paying approx. $22k of her own money, in order to fulfill her father’s wishes. The step-mother has also hired an attorney.
If you couple this with the fees associated with Hawley’s representation, and the fees associated with Evan’s step-mother’s lawyers, this amount balloons.
The costs to families aren’t just monetary
The monetary costs aren’t necessarily even the biggest problem for those involved. Many have explained it’s the stress of the unknowns and the time associated with fighting the judge’s order, working through the conservatorship process, and making sure their loved one is taken care of, and not exploited, that is the part that really takes a toll.
“What bothers me the most about the money… my dad was a frugal man who made a good living and lived within his means," Evans said. He saved so that my children and I could have it. He worked hard for it and scrimped and saved, and now there’s not much left.”
We need to do better as a state. We need to demand our lawmakers require more of our courts. We need more transparency and accountability within the system. We need for families to be kept together and not set against one another. We need change.
Follow this series for more one-on-one stories with those involved in the system here. Beyond those, we’ll be sharing detailed reports of what’s happening in Jefferson County and how you can get involved to reach out to lawmakers to fix this broken system.
No comments:
Post a Comment