Monday, October 28, 2024

With boosts from Hispanics, Blacks, and suburban women, Kamala Harris regains much of a lead over Donald Trump that had slipped, per ABC/Ipsos poll


Kamala Harris has regained much of a lead that had slipped recently in the 2024 presidential race with Donald Trump. That's from an ABC News report on the most recent ABC/Ipsos poll. From the ABC report, which also can be found at the Microsoft Network (MSN):

Vice President Kamala Harris has regained a slight lead among likely voters nationally in the latest ABC News/Ipsos poll, albeit with the race close enough to leave the outcome of the 2024 presidential election to the uncertainties of the Electoral College.

 Turnout is key. Just 2 percentage points divide Harris and Donald Trump among all registered voters, 49-47%. This goes to a slight Harris advantage among likely voters, 51-47%, with some pro-Harris groups showing a bit more propensity to vote.

Compared with earlier this month, Harris has regained a more customary Democratic advantage among Hispanic people and widened her advantage among suburban women, while remaining strong in core groups including Black people. Trump pushes back in rural areas and among non-college White men, and runs competitively among younger men.  

How do respondents view the candidates' "strengths" on certain issues? (Note: Responses on that question do not always square with reality. In short, quite a few would-be voters are not well-informed about the candidates or the issues. More on that in an upcoming post.) ABC has more details on how poll-takers view candidates' ability to handle issues of particular importance:

The candidates divide the pie in trust to handle top issues. Trump's best include immigration, with a 12-point advantage over Harris among registered voters; the economy overall, +8 points; inflation, +7; and the conflict in the Middle East, also +7. Harris responds with double-digit leads in trust to handle abortion rights  (+15) and health care (+10); she's also 8 points ahead in trust to handle "protecting American democracy" and +6 on helping the middle class.

The economy and inflation continue as prominent concerns, with 90% and 85% of registered voters, respectively, calling these highly important in their vote. But this poll, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates, with fieldwork by Ipsos, finds a shift in intensity: The shares assigning topmost importance to the economy or inflation, calling them "one of the single most important issues" in their vote, have declined by 7 points apiece since September.

What about issue importance, and the trust would-be voters have in the candidates? This is an area where Harris gets high marks:

Any shift from economic concerns likely would aid Harris, given her shortfall in trust to handle the issue and dissatisfaction with the Biden administration's economic performance. President Joe Biden labors with just a 36% job approval rating; differentiating herself from him has been a challenge for Harris. She has 95% support among registered voters who approve of Biden's job performance, compared with 16% among the majority who disapprove.

Notably, as well, protecting democracy ranks nearly as high as inflation in importance, cited by 81%. That's well above the importance of immigration, which Trump has been hitting hard, and abortion, a central focus for Harris. But these reflect partisan realities: Democrats are far more apt than others to pick abortion as a top issue; Republicans, to select immigration.

What about issue importance by partisanship (party affiliation)? Democrats were most concerned with abortion rights and health care, protecting American democracy, the economy, and looking out for the middle class. Republicans were most concerned with immigration (on the U.S.-Mexican border), crime and safety, inflation, and the economy. 

Ironically, 81 percent of Republicans (compared to 90 percent of Democrats) were concerned about protecting democracy, while it appears they plan to vote for Trump, who is widely considered the greatest threat to democracy in modern American history. 

Here are insights from ABC on personal attributes of the candidates and voter groups. Again, Harris generally scores well on personal attributes:

While they battle on issues, Harris continues to lead Trump on most personal attributes. Assessed head-to-head, Harris leads Trump by 11 points, 49-38%, in being seen as having the mental sharpness it takes to serve effectively as president -- a measure on which Trump had led Biden by 31 points.

Harris' advantage widens to 29 points on having the physical health to serve effectively; she's also more apt than Trump to be seen as honest and trustworthy, by 15 points; to understand the problems of people like you, by 10 points; and to share your personal values, by 8 points.

That said, there is a remaining personal attribute on which Trump runs essentially evenly with Harris, one that may matter in an unstable world: being trusted in a crisis. Forty-three percent pick Harris on this, 41%, Trump.

These aren't the only differences in views of the candidates' attributes. As reported Friday, registered voters are twice as likely to call Trump a fascist as to say this about Harris, and 16 points more likely to think he often says things that are not true. But they're also 5 points more likely to think Harris rather than Trump makes proposals just to win votes, not that she intends to carry out. (This doesn't make much sense. Would-be voters seem to be saying they see Harris as honest and trustworthy, but they think she becomes dishonest when she talks about her policy proposals.)

Eight percent of adults (and 10% of registered voters) say they've already voted (as of early last week); a disproportionately Democratic group, they went 62-33% for Harris.

This poll finds a notable shift in vote preferences among Hispanic people, 12% of likely voters and a potentially important group given the close contest, especially in the battleground states of Arizona and Nevada. Biden won Hispanic people by 33 points in 2020, per the ABC News exit poll, and Harris leads in this group by a similar 30 points now, 64-34% -- compared with 55-43% in early October.

Trump has some offsets to Harris' gain among Hispanic people. He now is +41 points among white men without college degrees, essentially matching his showing in this group in the 2020 ABC News exit poll, and also +41 points among rural voters.

Additionally, men younger than 40 were +6 points for Harris early this month; now they're +5 for Trump. This change is not statistically significant, nor is the difference between the candidates, given sample sizes. Nonetheless, the result stands in striking contrast to preferences among women younger than 40, who favor Harris by a 34-point margin.

Trump is a slight +6 among men overall, Harris +14 among women – almost exactly the average gender gap in presidential elections since 1996. This includes a 19-point lead for Harris among suburban women, vs. a slight 10-point margin for her in this group earlier in October.

The longstanding gender gap in presidential preference reflects the fact that women are more apt than men to be Democrats -- by 13 points among likely voters in this poll. This also appears in issue importance, with women more apt than men, by double digits, to pick both abortion and health care as top issues in their vote choice.

Many of these results among groups are similar to those in the 2020 exit poll. In one difference, Harris outperforms Biden four years ago among college-educated white women. She's also strong among college graduates overall. 

Another difference, though, is an important one for Trump: He's essentially even with Harris among independents, a group Biden won by 13 points in 2020, vs. a scant Harris +1 now. The candidate who's won independents has won nine of the last 12 presidential elections.

Overall vote preferences are essentially even among the general population (Harris +1) and registered voters (Harris +2) alike. As noted, this inches to a slight Harris +4 among likely voters.

The shift toward Harris among likely voters relies in part on consolidated support among Democratic base groups, notably Black people and liberals. While Harris has a 70-point advantage among all Black people, that widens to 83 points among Black likely voters, 90-7%. Ninety-six percent of liberal likely voters support Harris, vs. 91% of liberals overall. Additionally, she goes from 53% support among all suburban women to 59% among those likely to vote. Trump, by contrast, doesn't see significant bumps in support among likely voters.

Identifying likely voters entails estimation, and it can be a moving target as the campaigns work overtime to motivate turnout for their candidate and demotivate it for their opponent.

In one potential indicator of turnout, the candidates are close in voter enthusiasm -- 88% of Harris supporters are enthusiastic about her, as are 85% of Trump's about him. In another, Harris maintains a slight edge in voter contact, with Americans overall 5 points more apt to have been contacted by her campaign than by Trump's. In the seven battleground states, though, it's a non-significant 4 points -- and the 50-47% race there remains the equivalent of a dead heat.

Here is information on methodology used in the poll:

This ABC News/Ipsos poll was conducted online via the probability-based Ipsos KnowledgePanel® Oct. 18-22, 2024, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 2,808 adults, including 2,392 registered voters and 1,913 likely voters. Partisan divisions among all adults are 29-29-30%, Democrats-Republicans-independents; 32-32-29% among registered voters; and 35-35-27% among likely voters.

Results have a margin of sampling error of 2 percentage points, including the design effect, for the full sample and for registered voters, 2.5 points for likely voters and 5.5 points for likely voters in the battleground states, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Sampling error is not the only source of differences in polls. 

The survey was produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates, with sampling and data collection by Ipsos. See details on ABC News survey methodology here.

Sunday, October 27, 2024

Donald Trump, for reasons known only to him, puts Arnold Palmer's "manhood" in the spotlight, as journalists struggle to describe the ensuing nuttiness

Donald Trump and Arnold Palmer (Facebook)

How weird was Donald Trump's recent weekend on the campaign trail? It was so weird that journalists struggled to find words to describe it.

Emily Chang, in a joint report for NBC and Yahoo! News, describes how people who deal with words for a living found themselves grasping for words to report on the zaniness of Trump World.  Under the headline "Arnold Palmer’s daughter calls Trump’s remarks about her father 'disrespectful'," Chang writes:

Arnold Palmer's daughter, Peg Palmer Wears, reacted to former President Donald Trump's vulgar comments about her late father, calling them "disrespectful," "inappropriate," and "unacceptable."

"Being at the airport, which is named for my dad, where he flew out of to go to work every day or every week, you know, to come there and talk about … hackneyed anecdotes from the locker room … seemed disrespectful and inappropriate to me," she told ABC News Monday afternoon.

Not only was Arnold Palmer a renowned American golfer with a popular beverage named in his honor, he also has a regional airport named after him in his hometown of Latrobe, Pennsylvania. Campaigning at that airport on Saturday evening, Trump kicked off the rally with a long-winded story about Palmer, who died in 2016, specifically referring to the golfer's genitals.

"When he took showers with the other pros, they came out of there. They said, 'Oh my God. That's unbelievable,'" Trump joked.

Wears failed to find the humor in it. Chang writes:

According to Wears, Trump was "appropriating someone he admires to bolster his own image," and that "people deserve better."

"The people coming to these rallies deserve substance about plans Trump has as a candidate, if he could elucidate on some of the threats he's made to people," she continued. "I mean, these are important issues that should be discussed for people when they're getting ready to vote, and using my dad to cover over the important things just seems unacceptable to me."

Wears also confirmed to ABC News that she will be voting in the presidential election, though she did not disclose which candidate she plans to vote for.

An unaffiliated North Carolina voter, Wears plans to cast her ballot from one of the seven critical battleground states that could impact the election.

According to 538's polling averages, Trump is leading in North Carolina by 0.8 points.

In an article at The Independent, Ariana Baio reports this was not the first time Trump had shared the Arnold Palmer story in a public setting. Baio writes:

“There are countless stories attesting to Trump’s prurience, indulging in gossip and obsessing over others’ looks. In one of the most memorable, as he prepared for a trip to Latrobe, Pennsylvania, for a rally in late 2020, Trump recounted for Oval Office guests the time he had seen hometown golf legend Arnold Palmer disrobed at the Latrobe Country Club, and the size of his genitalia.”

Trump retold the story to rallygoers over the weekend, claiming when Palmer showered with other golf pros “They came out of there they said, ‘Oh my God. That’s unbelievable’.”

“This is a guy that was all man,” Trump added – an innuendo about Palmer’s genitalia.

The former president an avid golfer, has always expressed admiration for Palmer. He once called him, “a very good friend” and recalled playing golf with him. 

Trump often praised Palmer in his social media posts on X, formerly Twitter. He wished Palmer a happy birthday in 2014 and paid tribute to him after he died in 2016.

Trump’s Saturday anecdote is the latest in a string of strange, rambling stories he’s shared with his supporters while on the campaign trail. In recent weeks, Trump has significantly ramped up his number of rallies – focusing on swing states like Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Arizona.

In each city or town, Trump tries to relate to voters by sharing a story of his previous time there or bringing up a significant aspect of the area. For Latrobe, that was admiring Palmer.

But Palmer’s family did not find the remarks endearing. Peggy Palmer, the daughter of the late golfer, told The Independent she thought it was “an unfortunate way to remember my dad.”

“My father was very modest,” Peggy continued. “We’ve lost our sense of outrage in this country over just about everything, and I’m not sure that’s OK… There are other things about my dad that would be better to focus on.”

Trump's comment sparked so much nuttiness that a CNN host and a prominent Republican got into an argument over it. Under he headline "CNN host gets into awkward argument with top Republican about Trump’s bizarre Arnold Palmer comment," The Independent's Greg Evans writes:

CNN anchor Jake Tapper got into an awkward argument with Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson about the odd comments that Donald Trump made about former professional golfer Arnold Palmer during a rally on Saturday.

With just days to go before the election on 5 November, Trump used a campaign rally in Latrobe, Pennsylvania, Palmer’s birthplace, to speak for 12 minutes about Palmer’s manhood.

“This is a guy that was all man,” Trump said. “He took showers with the other pros, they came out of there, they said, ‘Oh my God, that’s unbelievable.’ I had to say it.”

“I had to tell you the shower part because it’s true,” he added.

Speaking to Johnson after the rally, Tapper questioned why Trump used a good chunk of his rally to talk about Palmer in such a manner, asking the Speaker of the House: “Is this really the closing message you want voters to hear from Donald Trump, stories about Arnold Palmer’s penis?”

Johnson tried to ignore the question and attempted to pivot to a debate about Kamala Harris, but Tapper refused to let the issue go.

“I’m sure that you think that a policy debate would be better than a personality debate, but if President Biden had gone on stage and spoke about the size of a pro golfer’s penis, I think you would be on this show right now saying you were shocked and appalled and you would suggest it was evidence of his cognitive decline,” Tapper propositioned Johnson, asking: “Why is he talking about Arnold Palmer’s penis in front of Pennsylvania voters?”

“Jake, you seem to like that line a lot,” retorted Johnson.

Tapper protested this, claiming that he didn’t like talking about Trump’s comments but that he had to because “Donald Trump is out there saying it.”

Johnson did eventually address Trump’s comments about Palmer, saying: “ I get it. There are lines in a rally. When President Trump is at a rally, sometimes he’ll speak for two straight hours.”

Johnson then went on to attack Biden and Harris again and put forward why he believes Trump will win in November.

The 52-year-old concluded by saying: “He says things that are off the cuff. But I’m telling you, I’ve been in those events. I’ve been in those arenas, and people have a great time at those arenas.”

Social media users were quick to mock Trump for his Palmer anecdote.

“According to the most recent NYT/Siena poll, the top three issues for swing voters include: 1. Inflation 2. abortion 3. The size of Arnold Palmer’s schlong,” podcast host Dan Pfeiffer wrote on X.

“But don’t call them weird,” author Jennifer Taub posted, alluding to Kamala Harris’s moniker for the former president and his running mate, JD Vance.

Ex-Trump officials release a letter supporting John Kelly's warnings that their one-time boss is a fascist and Hitler admirer who would rule as a dictator

Donald Trump and John Kelly (Getty)
 

Thirteen former aides to Donald Trump have signed a letter backing Gen. John Kelly's stark warnings that the former president is a fascist and admirer of the late Nazi leader Adolph Hitler and hopes to govern as a dictator if re-elected this year.

The letter was shared exclusively with Politico, which broke the story under the headline "Ex-Trump aides emerge to back Kelly’s harsh warnings; The letter from former White House officials comes as Harris is leaning into her closing argument that Trump is a threat to democracy. Meredith McGraw writes: 

More than a dozen former Trump administration officials on Friday came out in support of former chief of staff John Kelly, who went on the record this week to say the former president fits the definition of a fascist, would govern like a dictator, and has no concept of the Constitution.

In a new letter, shared exclusively with POLITICO, the former Trump administration officials — some of the officials have been outspoken Trump critics for years — stated, “this is who Donald Trump is.”

“The revelations General Kelly brought forward are disturbing and shocking. But because we know Trump and have worked for and alongside him, we were sadly not surprised by what General Kelly had to say,” the letter states.

Like Kelly, the former aides now see Trump as a danger to the United States, its government, its citizens' way of life, and perhaps world stability. They add that Kelly's warning should be taken seriously. McGraw writes:

“We applaud General Kelly for highlighting in stark details the danger of a second Trump term. Like General Kelly, we did not take the decision to come forward lightly. We are all lifelong Republicans who served our country. However, there are moments in history where it becomes necessary to put country over party. This is one of those moments” the letter states. “Everyone should heed General Kelly’s warning.”

The letter was signed by Trump administration officials, including Kevin Carroll, former senior counselor to Kelly; former deputy press secretary Sarah Matthews; former assistant secretary of homeland security Elizabeth Neumann; former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci; former chief of staff at the Dept. of Homeland Security Miles Taylor; former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham; former press secretary to the vice president Alyssa Farah Griffin; and former national security adviser to vice president Pence, Olivia Troye.

Taylor was the author of Anonymous, a book warning about Trump, and Troye and former press secretary Stephanie Grisham spoke at the Democratic National Convention.

The letter comes as Vice President Kamala Harris is leaning into her closing argument that Trump is a threat to democracy and poses a distinct threat if he’s re-elected. It’s a message she and her campaign staff believe resonates with independents and Trump-weary Republicans who are concerned about the former president returning to the Oval Office.

On Wednesday night, Harris’ campaign conducted a focus group with undecided voters in a battleground state, where the participants found Kelly to be credible and trustworthy and his criticism of Trump, according to a campaign official, granted anonymity to discuss the findings, made some of them think twice about the former president.

According to a campaign official, the Harris campaign learned that persuadable and undecided voters in recent battleground state polling, their target group, said that the former president’s pursuit of “unchecked power with no one to stop him” is one of their top concerns. They also found that one of the concerning messages for them on this point is that “those who worked closest with Trump while he was President have left and said he should not be President again because of the risk he poses to national security.”

Friday, October 25, 2024

Donald Trump -- an admirer of Hitler -- now has the word "fascist" hung around his neck, thanks to Gen. Mark Milley, Kamala Harris, Liz Cheney, and others

Adolph Hitler (USHMM)
 

Roughly one week ago, it was rare to hear anyone refer to Donald Trump as a "fascist." But with Gen. Mark Milley and Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris leading the way, the term became commonly attached to Trump in just a matter of days. How did that happen? Jonathan Weisman, of The New York Times proves to be a trusty guide on that question. Under the headline "Harris and Democrats Lose Their Reluctance to Call Trump a Fascist; Since Gen. Mark Milley was quoted as saying Donald Trump is “fascist to the core,” a term avoided by top members of the Democratic Party is suddenly everywhere," Weisman writes:

The word “fascist” has hovered around former President Donald J. Trump from the moment he rode down his golden escalator in 2015 to warn of Mexican rapists and drug dealers in the memorable opening of his bid for president. But for most top Democrats, it was a provocative term loaded with dread, historical import and potential incitement — best left unsaid.

Until Vice President Kamala Harris this week made clear — again and again — that it would be just fine with her to use the word.

On Tuesday, as the radio host Charlamagne Tha God interviewed Ms. Harris, he interjected as the vice president contrasted her vision with her rival’s. “The other is about fascism,” he said of Mr. Trump’s vision. “Why can’t we just say it?”

Ms. Harris’s response: “Yes, we can say that.”

It did not take other political types long to follow Harris' lead. It did not take Weisman long to pick up on it:

On Wednesday, speaking in Washington Crossing, Pa., Ms. Harris quoted Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under Mr. Trump, describing his former boss as “fascist to the core,” as detailed in a new book from the journalist Bob Woodward.

That third item -- Trump's overt threats against his political enemies -- prompted John Kelly, Trump's former chief of staff, to label him a "fascist" who craves "absolute power" and will "govern like a dictator." For good measure, Kelly also said Trump had expressed admiration for Adolph Hitler, claiming several times that the late Nazi leader had "done some good things."

Thursday, October 24, 2024

John Kelly, one-time chief of staff to Donald Trump, says his former boss frequently praised Adolph Hitler, and if re-elected, would prefer to govern as a dictator

Adolf Hitler addresses Nazi officials (Flicker)
 

Donald Trump's chief of staff from 2017-19 has issued a blistering critique of his former boss, labeling him a "fascist" who craves "absolute power" and will "govern like a dictator." John F. Kelly, a former U.S. Marine general, commander of the U.S. Southern Command, and secretary of homeland security (under Trump) has no shortage of credibility -- and his words could be damaging, even devastating, to Trump's hopes of being re-elected on Nov. 5. Kelly also said Trump had expressed admiration for Adolph Hitler, claiming several times that the late Nazi leader had "done some good things."

Stephanie Kaloi, of Yahoo News!, has the lowdown on Kelly's brutal takedown of a candidate who is used to tossing out insults, rather than being on the receiving end of them. Under the headline "Trump’s Former Chief of Staff John Kelly Warns He’s the ‘Definition of Fascist,’" Kaloi writes:

Donald Trump “certainly falls into the general definition of fascist” his former chief of staff John Kelly told The New York Times in an expansive interview published Tuesday.

Kelly opted to read a definition of fascism that he found online to support this conclusion. “Well, looking at the definition of fascism: It’s a far-right authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy,” he said. “So certainly, in my experience, those are the kinds of things that he thinks would work better in terms of running America.”

“The former president is in the far-right area, he’s an authoritarian, admires people who are dictators — he has said that. So he certainly falls into the general definition of fascist, for sure,” Kelly added.

In their time working together Kelly also observed that Trump “certainly prefers the dictator approach to government.” Trump sought a kind of absolute power, he continued, and “never accepted the fact that he wasn’t the most powerful man in the world — and by power, I mean an ability to do anything he wanted, anytime he wanted.”

Kelly has spoken out against Trump before, but he was not planning on adding his voice to the pre-election chorus of analysts and critics this year. But he changed his mind when Trump started talking about using the power of the U.S. government to go after his perceived rivals for political reasons, likely without a hint of due process. Kelly's words now make it clear that he believes Trump should never again be allowed anywhere near the White House. Kaloi writes:

Kelly didn’t always plan to speak against Trump, but the latter’s repeated “enemy within” comments prompted him to take action. “And I think this issue of using the military on — to go after — American citizens is one of those things I think is a very, very bad thing — even to say it for political purposes to get elected — I think it’s a very, very bad thing, let alone actually doing it,” the former Marine general added.

Trump has proven himself to be an extraordinarily selfish person, with little understanding of sacrifice, especially for one's country. The thought of such a person serving as commander in chief, overseeing U.S. military personnel, became a growing concern for Kelly. He has seen how Trump's self-centered personality plays out, in up-close terms. From the Yahoo! report: 

Kelly was equally concerned about another aspect of who Trump is as a person: his general lack of empathy. The pair were touring Arlington National Cemetery on Memorial Day 2017 near where Kelly’s own son, who was killed in 2010 while serving in Afghanistan, was buried.

Trump asked Kelly “what was in it” for servicemen and women who died in combat.

“‘And I thought he was asking one of these rhetorical kind of, you know, questions,’ Mr. Kelly said. ‘But I didn’t realize he was serious — he just didn’t see what the point was. As I got to know him, again, this selflessness is something he just didn’t understand. What’s in it for them?'”

Kelly’s interview was published the same day The Atlantic reported Trump said in a private conversation at the White House, “I need the kind of generals Hitler had.”

The outlet also noted Trump’s “desire to force U.S. military leaders to be obedient to him and not the Constitution” as well as his “denigration of military service, his ignorance of the provisions of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, his admiration for brutality and anti-democratic norms of behavior, and his contempt for wounded veterans and for soldiers who fell in battle.”

Kamala Harris, Trump's Democratic opponent for the presidency, has made Trump's selfishness -- and especially his alleged admiration of Hitler -- issues in the 2024 campaign. Kaloi writes:

Retired General and Vietnam veteran Barry McCaffrey told The Atlantic, “The military is a foreign country to him. He doesn’t understand the customs or codes. It doesn’t penetrate. It starts with the fact that he thinks it’s foolish to do anything that doesn’t directly benefit himself.”

Days before, The Atlantic published another piece that was more pointed: In “Trump Is Speaking Like Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini” Anne Applebaum writes that specific words used by Trump “belong to a particular tradition” — a tradition carried out by the aforementioned fascists and authoritarians. Chinese politician Mao Zedong and Cambodian leader Pol Pot also used similar rhetoric about their political foes and perceived enemies.

“In each of these very different societies, the purpose of this kind of rhetoric was the same,” Applebaum wrote. “If you connect your opponents with disease, illness, and poisoned blood, if you dehumanize them as insects or animals, if you speak of squashing them or cleansing them as if they were pests or bacteria, then you can much more easily arrest them, deprive them of rights, exclude them, or even kill them.”

Kamala Harris touched on Trump’s fascist leanings during a town hall hosted by Charlamagne Tha God. After a caller named Bobby said he was worried Trump would use the Alien Enemies Act to “put anyone that doesn’t look white in camps” (the Act was last used to intern Japanese-Americans during World War II), Harris answered, “He is running full-time on a campaign that is about instilling fear, not about hope, not about optimism, not about the future, but about fear. And so this is yet another example.”

Trump “would prefer to run on a problem instead of fixing a problem,” she added. “And he’s running his campaign in a way that he does these rallies — where people, by the way, walk out — to try and instill fear around an issue, where he actually could be part of a solution but he chooses not to, because he prefers to run on a problem instead of fixing a problem, and we’ve got to call it out and see it for what it is.”

Wednesday, October 23, 2024

New poll shows favorability turning in Kamala Harris' favor, forcing Trump to look at playing catch-up as his standing turns shaky in the 2024 presidential race

 

(Data for Progress)

Favorability matters in modern political polling, and a survey released Monday shows Kamala Harris is surging ahead of Donald Trump in that important category. The New Republic (TNR) provides details under the headline "Kamala Harris Just Got Some Great News; Newly released highly credible polls show her with strong advantages with two weeks left to go." Reporter/Producer Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling writes:

Vice President Kamala Harris may have better odds in the presidential election than previously predicted.

A poll published Monday by the Associated Press and the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago suggests that Harris has more than a marginal lead in favorability over the Republican presidential nominee, but is actually surging by double digits.

The nationwide poll, conducted last week, found Harris’s favorability to be significantly higher than Trump’s, with 51 percent of registered voters viewing Harris as a favorable candidate compared to just 40 percent who felt the same about Trump. Independent voters, notably, were equally split on their opinions of Harris, while the majority of independent voters—58 percent—felt negatively about Trump.

Surveyed voters also leaned toward the Democratic presidential nominee on a wide range of issues. Harris led with voters by 20 percent on election integrity, by 12 percent on middle-class taxes, by 11 percent on natural disaster relief, by five percent on the national housing crisis, and by two percent on jobs and unemployment. Trump, meanwhile, led with voters on immigration and crime, which he led Harris by eight percent and five percent, respectively.

But perhaps no Democratic stance resonated more with voters than abortion, which saw Harris lead Trump by 23 percent.

It has been known for months that abortion rights are a difficult  issue for Republicans. But this poll seems to take the issue and slam it directly into the GOP's face, in a way that likely is painful to read. Houghtaling writes:

Abortion has become a losing issue for Republicans nationwide. The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn abortion access proved disastrous for Republicans that November, resulting in major midterm losses in districts where abortion was a key talking point. Post-election, at least some members of the conservative party had a stunning reversal, with GOP consultants referring to the turning tide on the issue as a “major wake-up call.”

But much of the Republican party, especially the MAGA movement, has refused to give it up. Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance, for one, has previously likened abortion to murder, and has supported efforts to strip abortion access away from women. In 2023, the Ohio politico called for a “minimum national standard” on abortion restrictions, and his run for U.S. Senate in 2022 included language on his website that described him as “100 percent pro-life.”

Trump, meanwhile, has made abortion a key component of all three of his campaigns, repeatedly promising over the last eight years to ban the medical procedure at every available opportunity. While in office, he expressed support for a bill that would have banned abortion nationwide at 20 weeks.

Since then, he has used scare tactics to spread disinformation about the procedure, erroneously claiming that Democrats support abortions “after birth”—otherwise known as murder. And Trump’s track record includes the most egregious offense against national access—the appointment of three Supreme Court justices who voted to overturn Roe v. Wade.

 


 

 



 

 

Tuesday, October 22, 2024

Several recent displays of bizarre behavior have made Donald Trump's health -- both physical and mental -- an issue for the public to consider as Nov. 5 draws near

Donald Trump puts his dancing skills on display
 

Recent garbled speeches and public memory lapses have brought questions about Donald Trump's health -- both physical and mental -- back to the forefront in reporting about the 2024 presidential race. Axios addresses the issue under the headline "What we know about Trump's medical history." Sareen Habeshian and Rebecca Falconer write:

Former President Trump said in August he'd "gladly" release his medical records. But with less than three weeks to go until Election Day, his campaign has yet to release any basic health data.

Why it matters: Vice President Kamala Harris has released detailed health records and called for the 78-year-old who'd be the oldest president inaugurated if he wins in November to do the same, as questions about his physical and cognitive health mount.

  • There's no mandate for a presidential candidate to publicly disclose medical details, but a large group of medical professionals joined Harris this week in calling for Trump to be "transparent" about his health and said he's "displaying alarming characteristics of declining acuity."

The big picture: Former White House physician Jeffrey Kuhlman said Wednesday that as "an overweight ... never smoker," Trump "appears in good health" for his age, but he raised concerns about his cognitive ability for critical decision-making.

  • "He exhibits cognitive decline in reasoning, memory, and processing speed, consistent with his advanced age," added Kuhlman, who worked with former Presidents Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama but has never examined Trump, over email.
  • The Trump campaign responded to questions from Axios and others about whether it would release updated medical records by issuing a statement saying the Republican presidential nominee has "voluntarily released updates from his personal physician."
  • It linked to two July accounts from Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-Texas), who served as physician to the president in the Obama and Trump administrations, regarding the GOP leader's recovery from a bullet wound to his ear following an assassination attempt on him.
  • The campaign also shared a note from Trump's personal physician issued last November describing the ex-president's overall health as "excellent."

The intrigue: Kuhlman, author of the upcoming book Transforming Presidential Healthcare, said the information released thus far is "general and vague."

State of play: Trump offered scant information on his health during the 2016 campaign, except for a note from his personal doctor claiming he would be "the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency." The doctor later said Trump "dictated the letter."

Is Trump trying to hide something? Given his recent behavior, a reasonable person might ask that question. Also, Trump's public displays of peculiar behavior have caused numerous medical professionals to point online to signs that his cognitive ability is declining. Habeshian and Falconer write:

  • The most in-depth account about Trump's health occurred after his first physical examination at Walter Reed Medical Center in 2018.
  • Jackson detailed to reporters Trump's high cholesterol and a weight of 239 pounds.
  • That increased to 243 pounds at Trump's physical in 2019 — putting him at a BMI considered obese. His cholesterol levels had dropped by 2020, according to that medical report.
  • When Trump was hospitalized with COVID that year while running for re-election, his medical team offered conflicting accounts about the status of his health.

Trump has a family history of dementia, and data shows that can be an important consideration in diagnosing a patient. From the Axios report:

Zoom out: The former president's father, Fred Trump, was diagnosed with dementia in 1991, at the age of 86, and was later found to have Alzheimer's disease.

  • Kuhlman said a parental history of dementia is associated with roughly a twofold increase in relative risk for dementia.

It is ironic that Trump's slipping cognitive ability is in the spotlight, considering his efforts to drop that issue at President Joe Biden's feet. From Axios:

Flashback: Trump mocked octogenarian President Biden's age and questioned his fitness to serve when the two were competing in the 2024 presidential race, making age a key theme of the campaign.

  • Several polls at the time suggested most Americans believed both men were too old for another term, though more voters were concerned about the president's age.

Flash forward: Trump's cognitive health was again questioned this week after two medical events involving attendees at a town hall prompted him to call for over 30 minutes of music, during which he danced and swayed along.

Go deeper... Harris responds to Trump's town hall-turned "music fest": "Hope he's okay"