The stupidity and dishonesty of Alabama police officers is on glaring display in the video that captures the body slamming of Sureshbhai Patel, a grandfather from India who was in the state to help his son and daughter-in-law take care of their newborn son. (See video above.)
Similar stupidity and dishonesty would be on display if a video of my arrest in Shelby County, Alabama, ever is made public. I saw the video during my bench trial for resisting arrest in January 2014. At the time, it was under the control of assistant district attorney Tonya Willingham (firstname.lastname@example.org or 205-669-3750), and as public property, it still should be in her possession.
Let's consider the Patel video first, and two mind-blowing elements of it jump out at me:
(1) Almost from the moment the officers confront Patel on a sidewalk in Madison, Alabama, it's clear the older gentleman does not speak English. The 10-minute video, from the first police cruiser, shows this. In the first 1:30 of the encounter, an officer says, "I can't understand you, sir," and Patel mentions India and appears to point toward his son's house, a seemingly clear sign that he is not from this country and does not speak English, but has legitimate reasons to be here. Despite that, officers keep badgering Patel and giving instructions in English--acting baffled when he doesn't respond well and tries to quietly walk away. The encounter should have ended there, with no sign of a crime on Patel's part, but that's not what happened.
(2) At about 2:10 on the longer video, Officer Eric Parker tells Patel: "Do not jerk away from me again, or I will put you on the ground. Do you understand?" About four seconds later, Patel does not appear to be moving and certainly is not jerking. But Parker grabs him by the back of the neck, trips him, and thrusts him forward to violently land on his head.
(3) After all of this, the cops still don't seem to get it. "He don't speak a lick of English," one cop says. "I don't know what the problem is," another says. (See 3:26 video at the top of this post.) After the officers have almost broken Patel's neck by jamming his head into the ground, they seem amazed that he can't walk. "Stand up, stand up," one of them says. "You can walk," says another.
Let's consider a few elements from my encounter with Shelby County officer Chris Blevins:
(1) In his incident report, Blevins states that he has two warrants for contempt of court in his vehicle. But the video shows that they stayed in his vehicle, and he never showed them to me or mentioned that he had them. (See incident report at the end of this post.) He reports walking inside our garage to tap on the trunk of our car--all without showing he had any legal authority to be there or verbally stating why he was there. Despite that, Blevins apparently was surprised when I got out of my vehicle and, in his words, "began yelling for me to get out of his house." Gee, can't imagine why I would do that. An armed stranger, who has shown he has no legal grounds to be there, is walking right into my house--even after being told to get out. Why would that concern me?
(2) Blevins admits he made the initial physical contact after I put my right hand in my right front pocket. Apparently, he thought I was reaching for an assault weapon. (News flash: I was putting my car keys in my pocket, where they always go when I get home.) Blevins also noted that I pushed a button to close the garage door behind us. I don't remember doing that, but I do remember thinking, "Don't close the door because you want this guy out of here." It's possible I reflexively pushed the button because I've been doing it that way when I've come home for 25 years.
(3) Blevins then writes, "I told Mr. Shuler that I had a warrant for his arrest," but this is a lie--and the video proves it. He never mentions an arrest, his apparent purpose for being there, until after I've been knocked to a concrete floor three times and maced in the face.
(4) On the video, Blevins can be heard repeatedly saying, "Don't fight me, don't fight me" as he is shoving me around. But according to Blevins own words, I wasn't fighting him--it was the other way around. The only physical act that Blevins describes of me is putting my arms in front of me--an effort to try to protect my face and glasses from his flailing arms.
(5) Blevins admits throwing me through boxes, to the floor, three times. Never does he say I took any offensive action against him, other than raising my arms in front of my face.
(6) At my resisting-arrest trial, before District Judge Ron Jackson, prosecutor Willingham was ordered to turn over copies of any warrants as evidence. Her reply? "Your Honor, we don't have any." And she didn't ask for a recess, so that she could go find the warrants in her office, which is in the same building. As of now, it's a matter of court record that no warrant existed for my arrest. And that raises a whole bunch of disturbing questions under a landmark U.S. Supreme Court that we will be discussing in upcoming posts.
My entire arrest was captured on video, although it has some flaws. Blevins' vehicle was parked at about a 45-degree angle to our garage, so when we go inside the garage and the door closes, the dash cam loses sight of us and mostly shows our backyard. Audio, however picks up the whole thing--and that shows that Blevins entered our home without showing, or saying he had, a warrant. Blevins' own words, show that he initiated physical contact, and I never lashed out at him; I never cursed or threatened him, and I never tried to run away. Also, after Blevins and I exit the garage, Officer Jason Valenti can be heard threatening to break my arms.
The video should be made public.
Meanwhile, how in the world did I get charged with resisting arrest from all of this? Even conservative legal analysts, such as Ken White at Popehat blog, have said the preliminary injunction against me was prohibited under the First Amendment, and that means my arrest for allegedly violating the injunction was unlawful. On top of that, I contested service in the lawsuit--I did not ignore the court's order, as has been widely reported--and I'm aware of no hearing at which proper service was established. Without that, the court did not even have jurisdiction over me.
Maybe that's why no warrant has turned up. Perhaps no one wanted to sign a warrant for a citizen over whom the court had no jurisdiction.
Popehat is based in Los Angeles, and over all that distance, attorney White smelled something funny about my conviction for resisting arrest. He wrote:
It's not clear from the reporting how the prosecution proved the elements of the offense. I'm not talking about my standard skepticism of police claims that a suspect improperly resisted. I'm talking about proving that the arrest was lawful in the first place.
Under Alabama law resisting arrest is an attempt to prevent a lawful arrest. Resisting an unlawful arrest is not, as I understand Alabama law, a violation of the resisting arrest statute. To make a lawful arrest under Alabama law, a peace officer must have an arrest warrant, or must have probable cause to believe the suspect committed a felony, or must observe the suspect commit a crime. Shuler apparently argued at trial that the arresting officer didn't have a warrant and didn't observe any crime, and that therefore the arrest was not lawful and Shuler could not have committed the crime of resisting arrest. . . . Regrettably the news coverage of the brief bench trial doesn't clarify how the prosecution proved (if it did) that the arrest was lawful in the first place.
Popehat raises a powerful question: Can you be charged with resisting an unlawful arrest?
We will address that question shortly.
(To be continued)
(Note: Below is Officer Chris Blevins' incident report on my arrest. I have not run this previously because I've seen an Alabama Attorney General's opinion that says only the front page of an incident report is public information; the back page, including the narrative, is considered officer work product and therefore is not public. However, as the subject of the arrest, I am entitled to have a copy of the report, so I believe that overrides any work-product privilege that Blevins might assert. Anyone who wants to challenge this is welcome to contact me, but under the circumstances, I believe the following document is public information, especially since it all took place inside my home.)
These guys, once they saw the man couldn't speak English, should have waved a friendly goodbye and returned to their vehicle. Perhaps they could have observed him for a while, to see where he went and if he entered a home, which would have been a sign that he belonged there.
"I've broken his neck, but I don't understand why he won't stand up."
"Oh, I know, he don't speak a lick of English."
"But that shouldn't keep him from obeying my order to stand up, should it?"
"Hell if I know. I ain't never been to Indiana."
Top 10 reasons Alabama cops beat up Sureshbhai Patel:
10. Dispatcher said man with dark skin was looking for massages.
9. Patel appeared to have "yellow cake" from Niger in his pants pocket.
8 Patel had no weapon, so officer wanted to teach him a few cool martial arts moves for protection.
7. Patel looked like he might be a friend of Patricia Todd.
6. Bob Riley sent word that it was OK to do this under the "Cornerstone" ruling.
5. Mike Hubbard sent word that Patel was Bill Britt in disguise.
4. Officers took offense when Patel said, in Hindi, that their uniforms looked gay.
3. Roy Moore sent word that Deuteronomy says it's OK to paralyze black men on sidewalks.
2. Patel looked like he might support ObamaCare.
1. Officer Parker lost an Iron Bowl bet, and the pay up was to paralyze a "real skinny" black man.
Hey, Letterman, is that you?
If Blevins had a warrant, it should have been very easy to show it. Common sense tells you that's the way to defuse a potentially tense situation. His actions make me think he was instructed to rough you up.
I agree, @12:21. I think roughing me up was part of the plan. Arresting my wife also was part of the plan, but they were concerned about having to break in to do it. In my view, it was a planned double kidnapping, but they got only one of us.
Anonymous smart aleck:
You said you are "just asking questions," so I invited you to contact me directly, using your real name, and ask away. You haven't done it. Why?
Until you do, your comments won't see the light of day here, and I have no reason to care what you think because you are too big a coward to say it under your own name.
Keep sending comments if you have nothing better to do, but you are wasting your time. I would suggest you try getting a life.
Sounds like you have a troll, LS.
I'm not sure the person is smart enough to be classified as a troll.
Pretty interesting to read Officer Blevins' report about what took place in your garage. Thanks for sharing.
Why does he say he has two warrants in his vehicle, but then he never shows them. What's the point of having them?
I don't think he had them. If I had demanded to see them, I think he would have beaten me up and arrested me for "disorderly conduct."
Of course, I didn't demand to see them because he never told me he had them. As you say, what good are they sitting in his vehicle? Unless, of course, they weren't in his vehicle--or anywhere else.
You aren't willing to reveal your identity, and you call me insecure? Try looking in the mirror.
Also, why are you so uncomfortable with reports about my incarceration? It seems to upset your apple cart for some reason. Why? All you have to do is go to another blog, if you don't like the subject matter here.
You seem invested in keeping my experience under wraps. I was subjected to the same level of violence that was heaped on Mr. Patel. I'm just lucky that I didn't land on my head, and my falls were broken by various items in our garage. I was there, and you weren't. My wife and I still are suffering fallout from it, so the story is far from over for us. If the story is over for you, go read another blog, because it's going to be reported here--whether you like it or not.
In my view, criticism is worthless if you don't know the source. You apparently don't think much of your own critiques if you aren't willing to attach your name to it. Why should I pay any mind to it if you don't believe in it yourself?
I put my name on everything I do here. I expect the same courtesy from anyone who takes issue with what I do. If a critique is valid, and someone has the courage to stand behind it, I'm likely to take it to heart and change accordingly. But not if it comes from a ghost--someone I don't know and have no reason to respect.
I see no reason to take your words seriously, if you don't believe in them enough to attach your name to them.
Our enemies may have won one round in the corrupt courts of Alabama where the table is tilted & the game is rigged, but our struggle is known worldwide. We must continue publishing & encouraging The International to get involved in Alabama. There are good people outside of Alabama who are willing to fund change here & there's no one better at the persuasive speaking & writing we need to convince them to let go of their money than Roger Shuler. You pissed off a lot of conservatives & they're frightened of your potential to re-energize the Left. You gotta keep writing because that's exactly what the KKK doesn't want you doing. Even though you may not have personally profited from it yet, this blog has changed Alabama for the good. Screw the KKK members who put you in jail. Pick yourself up, dust yourself off & get ready to strike back.
Roger, it is rumored that Joey Kennedy has been fired from AL.com. Any word? He sure seems like a decent journalist and animal rights advocate.
I haven't heard anything about Joey Kennedy being fired at al.com, @1:05. Has anyone else heard?
He's a Pulitizer-Prize winner, so it's hard to imagine him being fired. But he seems to be to the left of the far-right sensibilities at al.com, so perhaps he stepped in some ideological doo-doo. Would be a significant story if it's true.
Post a Comment