Sunday, May 19, 2024

Trump freezes up near end of speech in Texas, prompting social-media sparks to fly, as confusion swirls about what really happened at NRA event

Donald Trump appears frozen, confused at Texas speech (Getty)
 

Donald Trump froze and stopped talking for an estimated two minutes during a speech Saturday night at a National Rifle Association (NRA) event in Dallas, TX. Trump has been plagued by verbal gaffes at campaign rallies in recent weeks, raising concerns that he might have some kind of brain impairment. Was the incident in Dallas another in a growing line of alarming events where Trump has struggled to speak clearly -- or speak at all? That is how it looked according to a report at rawstory.com.  

Under the headline "'Glitched out': Internet erupts as Trump 'blacks out for a beautiful 2 minutes' at event," Raw Story's David McAfree reports:

Donald Trump on Saturday made major waves on social media after he stopped talking during his rally speech, and stayed silent for a significant period of time before speaking again. 

Trump over the weekend gave a speech for the National Rifle Association in Texas, and was criticized for appearing to mess up his words as well as some key facts.

It was at the end of the speech, though, that something strange appeared to happen that made Trump completely stop speaking.

It occurred when Trump was complimenting Texas.

"You have a great governor, you have a great lieutenant governor. You have incredible congress people you have just fantastic people," he said. "The Texas spirit of proud independence was forged by cowboys and cattle hands, ranchers and rangers, oil workers, soldiers and brave, brave, brave, pioneers. Many came here with nothing but the boots on their feet, the clothes on their back, and a gun..."

Trump then repeated a common firearm hobbyist phrase, "Come and take it."

"Come and take it," he said. "Together they helped make America into the single greatest nation in the history of the world."

At that point, the former president remained silent for an extended period of time as music played in the background.

At that point, video of he incident made its way to social media, and political sparks started flying, McAfee writes:

"But now we are a nation in decline.," Trump finally says. "We are a failing nation. We are a nation that has the highest inflation in 58 years. Our banks are collapsing, and interest rates are skyrocketing."

A "Biden's wins" account shared the video online, saying, "Donald Trump just glitched out and froze at his rally tonight. He is clearly unfit for office."

@Leslieannscott then responded. 

"Oh my freaking word!!!! Trump totally blacks out for a beautiful 2 minutes. It’s so bizarre set to weird cult music. You have no idea. He’s losing it! He’s at the NRA convention saying he will roll back every gun safety Law [President Joe Biden] put in place."

"He’s shaking his head in disgust as his teleprompter went down."

----------------------------------------------

From the language Leslie Ann Scott uses, I can't tell if she agrees with the original commenter or disagrees with her. From her use of the word "beautiful" and her apparent distaste for President Biden's efforts to address gun violence, my guess is that Scott is a Trump supporter being sarcastic. But that is just a guess. Perhaps this will serve as a reminder to communicate with clear language, even in the "Wild, Wild West" of social media.

Watch the video at the link above or click the link here.

A number of media outlets have presented conflicting reasons for Trump's odd behavior -- from swatting at flies, to struggling with a malfunctioning teleprompter, to intentionally pausing to allow dramatic music to play.

A Trump campaign spokesperson threw out a number of possible excuses, but I'm not sure anything he says can be believed. It will be interesting to see if Trump takes questions about the incident from the press. My guess is that he won't (and who would believe him anyway?), so confusion likely will continue to swirl about what really happened.


































 


Evangelical Christians say Donald Trump -- a philanderer and adjudicated sex abuser -- shares their values; maybe someone should re-examine their values

(TikTok)

If you are like me -- an avowed Never Trumper -- you might have had this question rolling around in your head: How does a chunk of the U.S. electorate find enough appealing qualities in Donald Trump to think he would make a good president? I don't think Trump is qualified to run a Slurpee machine, so why do some of my fellow Americans think he is fit to run the country?

An article out yesterday from the Associated Press (AP) provides an unsettling answer: A cohort of American "Christians" find that Trump appeals to the prejudices or grievances (real or imagined) that lie just beneath the surface of  their holier-than-thou image. That anyone could find a religion-based appeal in Donald Trump -- who has few signs of even a shallow faith, little to no apparent understanding of the Bible. a habit of cheating on his wives, having unprotected sex with a porn star, being adjudicated in a court of law as a "rapist" -- is enough to leave one speechless. In short, the AP report suggests a subset of "Christians," by putting their faith and trust in Trump, show that they take neither their religion nor their politics seriously. Given that Trump clearly intends to sweep aside democracy, the constitution, and the rule of law to usher in an authoritarian government, guided almost entirely by his personal whims, indicates a certain "Christians" find something lacking with democracy, to the point they want the kind of change that likely will involve Donald Trump instituting a dictatorship -- or something very close to it. Have these "holy people" been too busy, or too delusional, to notice the words coming straight from Trump's mouth? If so, it's time they came down from their moral high horse and get acquainted with what Trump plans to do to our country.

Under the headline "Jesus is their savior, Trump is their candidate. Ex-president’s backers say he shares faith, values," AP's Peter Smith writes:

As Donald Trump increasingly infuses his campaign with Christian trappings while coasting to a third Republican presidential nomination, his support is as strong as ever among evangelicals and other conservative Christians.

“Trump supports Jesus, and without Jesus, America will fall,” said Kimberly Vaughn of Florence, Kentucky, as she joined other supporters of the former president entering a campaign rally near Dayton, Ohio.

Trump supports Jesus? Is that what he was doing with Stormy Daniels in a Lake Tahoe, NV, hotel room during a celebrity golf tournament? Has this woman being interviewed even heard of Stormy Daniels -- or Karen McDougal, for that matter?

At the campaign rally near Dayton, Smith says there were signs of religious ignorance -- some might call them sacreligious -- all over the place. He writes:

Many of the T-shirts and hats that were worn and sold at the rally in March proclaimed religious slogans such as “Jesus is my savior, Trump is my president” and “God, Guns & Trump.” One man’s shirt declared, “Make America Godly Again,” with the image of a luminous Jesus putting his supportive hands on Trump’s shoulders.

Many attendees said in interviews they believed Trump shared their Christian faith and values. Several cited their opposition to abortion and LGBTQ+ rights, particularly to transgender expressions.

Nobody voiced concern about Trump’s past conduct or his present indictments on criminal charges, including allegations that he tried to hide hush money payments to a porn actor during his 2016 campaign. Supporters saw Trump as representing a religion of second chances.

And for many, Trump is a champion of Christianity and patriotism.

“I believe he believes in God and our military men and women, in our country, in America,” said Tammy Houston of New Lexington, Ohio.

“I put my family first, and on a larger scale, it’s America first,” said Sherrie Cotterman of Sidney, Ohio. “And I would any day of the week, take a president that openly knows he needs the strength from God over his own.”

Trump believes in our military men and women? Is that why he has referred to them as "losers" and "suckers"? Is that why he skirted military service by citing "bone spurs"? This peculiar belief in Trump as a Godly, patriotic man is not new, Smith reports:

In many ways, this is a familiar story.

About 8 in 10 White evangelical Christians supported Trump in 2020, according to AP VoteCast, and Pew Research Center’s validated voter survey found that a similar share supported him in 2016.

But this is a new campaign, and that support has remained durable — even though Republican voters in the early primaries had several openly conservative Christian candidates to choose from, none of whom faced the legal troubles and misconduct allegations that Trump does. In the Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina Republican primary contests earlier this year, Trump won between 55% and 69% of White evangelical voters, according to AP VoteCast.

Trump even criticized one competitor, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, for signing strict abortion curbs into law. In past years, some Trump surrogates have portrayed Trump as friendly to the LGBTQ+ community.

Trump was the only Republican candidate facing scores of criminal charges, ranging from allegations that he conspired to overturn his 2020 election defeat to his current trial on allegations he falsified business records in seeking illegally to sway the 2016 election with hush money to porn actor Stormy Daniels.

Trump was also the only GOP candidate with a history of casino ventures and two divorces, as well as allegations of sexual misconduct — one of them affirmed by a civil court verdict.

Republican primary voters still overwhelmingly chose Trump.

This has frustrated a minority of conservative evangelicals who see Trump as an unrepentant poser, using the Bible and prayer sessions for photo props. They see him as lacking real faith and facing credible, serious misconduct allegations while campaigning with incendiary rhetoric and authoritarian ambitions.

Karen Swallow Prior, a Christian author and literary scholar who has spoken against fellow evangelicals’ embrace of Trump, said this support in 2024 is familiar but “intensified.”

In the past, she said Trump supporters hoped but weren’t certain that Trump shared their Christian faith.

“Now his supporters believe themselves,” she said. “Despite the fact that Trump clearly wavers on abortion and he wavers on LGBTQ issues, those things are just ignored, they’re just erased out of the narrative.”

At the Ohio rally, several attendees cited their belief that Trump has followed the Christian path of repenting and starting a new life.

Repenting and starting a new life? That's what Trump was doing with Stormy Daniels -- and when he sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll, penetrating her with his finger in a department store? Based on recent news accounts, Trump did not even bother to use a condom during his encounter with Stormy Daniels. His new life sounds a lot like his old life. Smith writes:

“We’ve all come from sinning. Jesus sat with sinners, so he’s going to sit with Trump,” Vaughn said. “It’s not about where Trump came from, it’s about where he’s going and where he’s trying to take us.”

The Ohio rally, like other Trump events, featured a recording of the national anthem sung by some of those convicted for crimes related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, whom Trump called “patriots.”

At the rally’s entrance, one group handed out pamphlets urging attendees both to “trust in Jesus Christ for your salvation” and to support the “J6 patriots.”

Caleb Cinnamon, 37, of Dayton, identified as a Christian and said opposing abortion is a top priority. He cited Trump’s three Supreme Court appointments, who proved decisive in the 2022 decision overturning of the Roe v. Wade precedent that had legalized abortion nationwide.

Something tells me Ms. Vaughn has no clue where Trump is trying to take us. Writes Smith:

One interviewee said: “Donald Trump’s really the first president who’s not only vocalized an anti-abortion stance but also put action behind it,“Republicans since the 1990s were saying ‘We’re going to do this about abortion,’ and then they don’t.”

Jody Picagli of Englewood, Ohio, said her Catholic faith and views on abortion are central.

“I’m a big right-to-life person,” she said. “That’s huge for me. And just morals. I think the moral compass is so out of whack right now. And we need religion and church back in here.”

She acknowledged that, with the Supreme Court turning the abortion issue over to the states, a future President Trump may not impact abortion law.

“But I know he’ll never go to an abortion clinic and visit it, like our vice president did,” she said, alluding to Kamala Harris’ tour of a Planned Parenthood clinic in Minnesota in March.

Christian supporters of Trump did also cite non-religious issues — from foreign policy and immigration to gas prices and inflation.

One expert on public religion says evangelical support for Trump comes from a very dark pace. Smith writes:

Robert Jones, president of the Public Religion Research Institute and an author of books on white supremacy in American Christianity, said the strong evangelical support for Trump isn’t surprising. But he said that in a 2023 PRRI poll, less than half of White evangelicals said that abortion was a critical issue to them personally. More than half said that five others were a critical issue, including human trafficking, public schools, rising prices, immigration and crime.

“One of the biggest myths about White evangelical support for Trump is this idea that it’s really about abortion and they’re holding their nose and voting for Trump,” Jones said.

He added that Trump’s rhetoric about immigrants “invading the country and changing our cultural heritage” resonates with his audience.

The slogan “Make America Great Again” echoes an “ethno-religious vision of a White Christian America, just barely underneath the surface,” Jones said.

He acknowledged the racial lines aren’t absolute, with Trump attracting Black supporters such as South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott.

The Ohio rally included a vast majority of White attendees but with some Black and other ethnic groups represented.

Earlier this year, Trump hit multiple applause lines in speaking to a conservative audience at the National Religious Broadcasters convention.

“We will protect Christians in our schools and in our military and our government,” Trump said. “We will protect God in our public square. … I will protect the content that is pro-God.”

Trump pledged a federal task force to fight the “persecution against Christians in America” and “the toxic poison of gender ideology,” saying “God created two genders, male and female.”

Trump’s rallies take on the symbols, rhetoric and agenda of Christian nationalism, which typically includes a belief that America was founded to be a Christian nation and seeks to privilege Christianity in public life.

Trump endorsed a Bible edition that includes U.S. founding documents and the lyrics to Lee Greenwood’s “God Bless the USA.”

“This is a Bible specifically for a kind of White evangelical audience that sees themselves as the rightful inheritors of the country,” Jones said, citing a 2023 PRRI poll in which about half of White evangelicals agreed that God intended America as a promised land for European Christians.

Trump’s campaign events have the feel of a worship service. The former president has shared a “God Made Trump” video depicting him in messianic terms. Jones said Trump builds on the messianic theme with statements like, “They’re not after me, they’re after you. I’m just standing in the way.”

But Mark DeVine, a Southern Baptist pastor and seminary professor from Birmingham, AL, wrote in the online journal American Reformer that conservative Christians support Trump because “elected Democrats and Democrat-serving, unelected bureaucrats” have an “evil” agenda on issues ranging from abortion to gender to the border to pandemic lockdowns that kept churches closed.

“Trumpers want to shield themselves, their children, their communities, and the nation they love from the woke, totalitarian onslaught now being unleashed upon them where they live, work, study, play, and worship,” he wrote.

At the Ohio rally, some said they believed the nation or its founding documents, such as the Bill of Rights, had Christian origins, though historians dispute such assertions.

Some Trump supporters voiced hope for a more Christian America.

Thomas Isbell of Greensboro, North Carolina, who has set up vending booths for years at Trump rallies around the country, said his “God, Guns & Trump” shirts are a top seller.

“It’s a Christian country,” he said, adding that if he were president, he would only allow public worship by Christians.

“We’re not going to set up a temple to no other gods in our land,” he said.

Friday, May 17, 2024

Mere hours after agreeing to two presidential debates with Joe Biden, Trump started showing signs of trying to wiggle out of the agreement. What's going on?

(Twitter)
 

On Wednesday (5/15/24) Donald Trump agreed in writing to do two presidential debates with Joe Biden. Before the day was over, Trump showed signs that he already was trying to squeeze out of the deal, possibly setting up a scenario where he could try to blame Biden if no debates take place before the Nov. 5, 2024, election.

If Trump winds up skirting two debates to which he already had agreed, that seems to raise a number of questions about the presumptive Republican nominee:

1. Does this add to the mounting evidence that Trump is unreliable, dishonest, sketchy, and disrespectful of political norms and the American public, making him unfit to hold higher office?

2. Is something wrong with Trump, perhaps a serious brain disorder, that caused him to conduct rallies over the past two weeks in which he spoke in an often nonsensical, incoherent fashion. At a rally in Wildwood,NJ, Trump confused former President Jimmy Carter with tennis great Jimmy Connors, praised fictional serial killer Hannibel Lecter as "a wonderful man," and struggled to say "Venezuela." The week before, he had similar problems during a campaign swing through Virginia and North Carolina. 

3. Some of Trump's verbal gaffes at the rallies likely were drowned out by  his cheering MAGA supporters, many of whom probably didn't care what he was saying anyway. But in a debate setting with no audience (just Trump and Biden), which Trump agreed to, he might have realized every word, and how he said them, would be scrutinized, and he would be at risk of figuratively falling on his face.

4. There has been much speculation in recent months about Trump's mental health (Biden's, too, for that matter), and that raises our most serious question: Does Trump know he has a brain disorder -- perhaps frontotemporal dementia (FTD). An article at prevention.com includes this section on the symptoms of FTD:

Because FTD starts in the frontal lobe, which is responsible for mood and behavior, the person often becomes aggressive or apathetic, displays a lack of empathy, may use inappropriate language, and even act out sexually. Because of this, FTD is often mistaken for a psychiatric disorder, says says Elise Caccappolo, Ph.D., associate professor of neuropsychology at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. “The patient’s partner may come in and say they think they’re depressed or bipolar,” she explains. “It can be very hard on the caregiver.” :

We addressed age-related concerns about both candidates' mental acuity in an earlier post, and here is a section about how one expert assessed Trump and Biden:

In an interview with Salon, psychologist Dr. John Gartner, said:

“There is [ ] this focus on Biden's gaffes or other things that are well within the normal limits of aging. By comparison, Trump appears to be showing gross signs of dementia. This is a tale of two brains. Biden's brain is aging. Trump's brain is dementing.”

During his administration, nobody (at least nobody who was telling the truth) would have said that Donald read his briefings or was very engaged in any serious issues. His recent public appearances make it clear that he would be even less equipped if, by some tragic circumstance, he were allowed back in the Oval Office.

Reports about Trump's apparent squishiness regarding the debates started to appear late Wednesday night at a number of news outlets, particularly Newsweek: Because the story broke late in the evening, many Americans might not be fully aware of what has been going on. Hafiz Rashid, of The New Republic (TNR), explains under the headline "Pathetic Trump Already Trying to Weasel Out of Debating Biden; After agreeing to two debates with Biden, Donald Trump seems to be trying to set up an excuse to escape the whole thing":

After President Joe Biden and Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump on Wednesday morning agreed to two debates in June and September, Trump suddenly began trying to push a third debate all on his own. .

“Please let this TRUTH serve to represent that I hereby accept debating Crooked Joe Biden on FoxNews. The date will be Wednesday, October 2nd. The Hosts will be Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post Wednesday afternoon.

Trump’s campaign had announced that it had accepted an invitation from CNN to debate Biden on June 27—as well as a second invite for a debate moderated by ABC on September 10. Biden, who had previously accepted an invitation from CNN, also agreed to take part in ABC News’s debate as well. But Trump’s post seems to indicate that the former president is trying to alter the agreement on his own. Biden’s campaign accused him of “playing games.”

“Donald Trump has a long history of playing games with debates: complaining about the rules, breaking those rules, pulling out at the last minute, or not showing up at all—which he’s done repeatedly in all three cycles he’s run for president,” said Biden’s reelection campaign chair, Jen O’Malley Dillon, in a statement.

“President Biden made his terms clear for two one-on-one debates, and Donald Trump accepted those terms. No more games. No more chaos, no more debate about debates. We’ll see Donald Trump on June 27th in Atlanta—if he shows up,” Dillion added.

Is Trump trying to make excuses and eventually weasel out of debates? He already skipped debates during the Republican presidential primaries, but those were to his political advantage as he never trailed any of his GOP opponents in the polls. In this case, chickening out would probably look very bad. It should be easy to debate an opponent you’ve dubbed “Sleepy Joe.” Of course, Trump has little room to talk, now that he’s been caught snoozing multiple times during his hush-money trial.

Here is what Trump wrote on Truth Social late Wednesday, according to a Newsweek report under the headline "Donald Trump Launches All-Caps Attack on Joe Biden After Agreeing to Debate":

CROOKED JOE BIDEN IS THE WEAKEST, MOST INCOMPETENT, AND MOST DISHONEST PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES BUT, MOST IMPORTANTLY, HE IS THE WORST PRESIDENT OUR COUNTRY HAS EVER SEEN OR KNOWN. HOPEFULLY, THERE WILL NEVER BE ANOTHER ONE LIKE HIM. HE IS A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY!"

What is the point of that statement, and what is Trump trying to pull? It's possible even he doesn't know. 

Thursday, May 16, 2024

Stage is set for Biden-Trump debates, launching a rematch of 2020, with Biden anxious to defend a record that is stronger than many Americans realize

Joe Biden and Donald Trump debate in 2020; the rematch is coming soon (Getty)..

Joe Biden has listened for months to concerns about his age and mental acuity, plus his poor polling numbers, while the mainstream press tends to give his opponent, Donald Trump, a free pass -- even after recent rallies where he confused former President Jimmy Carter with tennis great jimmy Connors, praised fictional serial killer Hannibel Lecter as a "wonderful man," and struggled to say the word "Venezuela.

Perhaps that is why an Ivy League professor of history and public affairs has written an op-ed piece under the the headline "Why Biden’s eager to debate Trump." Julian Zelizer, a faculty member at Princeton University and a CNN political analyst, seems to be driving home this primary point: Biden has been playing on an uneven playing field in terms of media scrutiny and likely looks forward to engaging Trump on a "playing surface" that is relatively level.

It also is likely that Biden is anxious to set the record straight, to show that he has been a much more effective president than many Americans seem to realize -- as was borne out by new reports issued yesterday on the economy and inflation, showing that Biden has been a solid steward in two areas of national concern. Zelizer writes:

President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump have both accepted an invitation from CNN to debate on June 27, nearly four years since they last clashed onstage. Biden, who was first to accept the invitation Wednesday morning, posted on X: “I’ve received and accepted an invitation from @CNN for a debate on June 27. Over to you, Donald. As you said: anywhere, anytime, any place.” Trump later told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins he also accepted. The June date, much earlier in the general election cycle than usual, is a reflection of the growing importance of early voting as well as the voracious appetite for political news on cable television and social media.

Later Wednesday morning, both men said they also accepted an invitation from ABC to a second debate on September 10.

For the first time in decades, whether there would even be debates had been uncertain. During the Republican primaries, Trump refused to debate his opponents in the five GOP debates that were hosted from August 2023 to last January, hoping to make them seem beneath him. He preferred to get his own airtime on social media and Fox News. But Trump can’t resist a chance to take on the president.

This appears to be like a case of two boxers who are convinced they can win in a head-to-head showdown. But Biden might have particularly strong reasons to feel confident, Zelizer writes:

Biden seems confident. After all, he took the stage twice in 2020 and won. He wants to do it again. Trump seems to be tempted to go mano a mano and show that he is a better fit to be commander in chief. Although challengers are frequently more eager to debate than incumbents, Biden is likely feeling more pressure than usual to perform on the national stage given concerns within the Democratic Party and among moderates about his age and polls showing he is trailing Trump in some swing states. Moreover, while incumbent presidents normally enjoy far more attention than those seeking to replace them, in this election, the fact that Trump is a former president and one who is able to command ongoing media attention makes the debates more important for Biden.

The debates will not take place according to the schedule preferred by the Commission on Presidential Debates, a sign of how campaigns are seeking as much control as possible over these high-stakes performances and are uneasy with having to follow the rules set up by the nonpartisan body. Trump has also frequently expressed his distrust of the nonpartisan commission, which he says is biased against him.

Presidential debates seem to be embedded in the fabric of American politics. But it has not always been that way, Zelizer reports:

Televised presidential debates are still a relatively new phenomenon in American history. The first televised debate took place on September 26, 1960, as then-Senator John Kennedy and then-Vice President Richard Nixon famously squared off in a series of encounters that some experts credited with swinging the election in JFK’s favor.

Then there was a break until 1976, when President Gerald Ford took on former Georgia Gov. Jimmy Carter. One of the three debates featured a genre-defining gaffe when Ford seemed to be saying that the Soviet Union did not dominate Eastern Europe. Another debate became famous when the sound equipment broke down, and both candidates stood essentially frozen in front of the cameras for almost a half hour. 

Televised debates remained a central part of the election cycle. In 1984, President Ronald Reagan used the airtime to shoot down concerns about his age, telling the moderators, the audience, and his opponent, former Vice President Walter Mondale, that “I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent’s youth and inexperience.” In 1992, President George H.W. Bush stumbled by looking at his watch in the middle of a town hall debate with then-Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton and third-party candidate Ross Perot.

One of the biggest changes that took place in campaigns was who determined the structure of debates. The League of Women Voters, which sponsored these debates from 1976 to 1984, withdrew in 1988. The debates then took shape through the Commission on Presidential Debates.

Many critics dismiss the current debates as irrelevant. They argue that these contests are shallow, made-for-television (and now social media) spectacles that involve soundbite-ready insults and non-answers to substantive questions. Over the years, the staging of the debates has also become more of a show, as news-centered cable and network stations play a bigger role in staging and promoting them.

But the debates still matter, and it is important that Biden and Trump will square off. For all their flaws, the debates still offer voters the best opportunity to see the people running for extended periods of time and in the least-scripted interaction that will take place. It is often possible to learn a great deal about the character and stamina of the candidates through how they perform. Just the way that the candidates fight each other gives a good flavor about how they conduct their business (see Trump menacingly prowling around the stage behind Hillary Clinton in 2016).

Biden has a history of performing well against Trump, Zelizer notes:

During the 2020 election, Biden was effective during the debates, pushing back against claims that he was too old for the presidency. Trump revealed much about himself, such as when he refused to condemn White supremacists and told the far-right group Proud Boys to “stand back and stand by,” which they did until January 6, 2021.

Next month, President Biden will have an opportunity to demonstrate that concerns about his age are misplaced. Former President Trump will have a chance to prove that he has some kind of compelling vision for the country beyond his desire to take down his opponents and "the establishment." Both men will have the chance to cut into the weaknesses of each other, trying to set the tenor for the debates that are to come.

When voters feel that they know the two candidates so well, as is the case in 2024, watching them on stage will offer a reality check about what is real and what is fake, and remind voters of what each man would be like in a second term.

How will the debates be structured? That still is to be determined:

There are many questions still to be settled, including the specific rules that will be used since the commission won’t set them and whether third-party candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. should participate (CNN’s rules include that he must reach 15% in the polls, a figure he hasn’t reached).

As ugly as the contest is likely to be, it is better for the nation that we have debates. For the moment, at least, it will give crucial information about the candidates to the voters, who won’t only have to rely on the world of surrogates, influencers and social-media commentators to make sense of what’s going on.


Wednesday, May 15, 2024

Michael Cohen testifies that, after Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal were paid hush money, more women were set to come forward with tales about a candidate who can't keep his mouth shut or his fly zipped

Donald Trump and Karen McDougal (Twitter)
 

Michael Cohen, longtime lawyer and fixer for Donald Trump, has testified in the New York hush-money trial that the former president warned him the story could go on for quite a while and pose a major threat to his political hopes, according to a report at The New Republic (TNR).. In other words, Cohen testified, the two best-known women to bring such allegations forward -- former Playboy model Karen McDougal and former porn actress Stormy Daniels -- likely would be the first of many to share stories of sexual encounters with Trump.

Cohen's testimony suggests Trump and his legal team have been dealing with such problems for a long time, perhaps dating to the days before he became president. Under the headline "Michael Cohen Says Trump Warned Him About This Creepy, Horrific Detail; Trump worried “a lot of women” would want to share negative stories about him," TNR's Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling provides insight:

Around the start of his 2016 campaign for president, Donald Trump warned his closest advisers that there would be a tidal wave of negative stories coming out about him—especially from women, his former fixer Michael Cohen said Monday.

While on the stand in Trump’s hush-money trial, Cohen recalled a revealing conversation he had with Trump just before he announced his campaign, in which the former reality TV star warned him that they could see a spike in sexual-assault allegations.

“You know that when this comes out, meaning the announcement, just be prepared, there’s going to be a lot of women coming forward,” Cohen said Trump told him at the time.

Based on the TNR account, it sounds as if Trump shared this information in a matter-of-fact way, with no sense of shame or regret -- or, as the TNR headline states, no understanding of how "creepy" his behavior was. It seems most folks in the Trump orbit took the news with a "That's just The Boss being The Boss" attitude.

In essence, Trump was describing himself as a serial sexual predator -- a subject the public has come to learn much about since he first became president. And it raises this question: If Trump wins the 2024 race with incumbent Joe Biden, how much of his time and energy will be consumed by dealing with the fallout of his sexual escapades over the years? Will he have time to run the country? Should the public trust a man whose third wife could not trust him, even while she was home with a newborn son?  As Houghtaling reports, Trump was right about one thing: Women did come forward:

At least 26 women have accused Trump of touching them inappropriately, with some accounts dating back decades. Several have come forward into the public eye to advance their allegations against the three-time GOP presidential nominee, often risking the ire and relentless harassment of Trump’s cult-like following.

Yet just a couple have found relative success in holding him accountable. Writer E. Jean Carroll was the first woman whose case against Trump made it to a courtroom. She won big against Trump last May when a jury unanimously found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming her, awarding her $5 million in damages, and again in January when another jury decided he owed her $83.3 million for defaming her a separate time.

But her justice still hangs in the air. Trump has posted a $92-million bond to appeal the ruling, while Carroll has become a villain in Trumpworld, suffering relentless online vitriol slung by his frenetic base.

Trump has issued individual and blanket denials to the abuse allegations, often claiming that the women were paid to lie about the stories. Meanwhile, Trump was reportedly paying women, including porn star Stormy Daniels and Playboy model Karen McDougal,  to stay silent about their sexual encounters.

Daniels is the only other woman to testify against Trump in a court. She gave bombshell testimony last week about her relationship with the former president and the payment she received to keep quiet about it. In fact, some of Trump’s other accusers have been contacting each other in light of Daniels’ testimony, discussing how much they related to her story.

That sounds like any future Trump presidency could be overwhelmed with stories of sexual encounters from his shady past.  For now, Houghtaling writes . . . .

Trump is accused of using Cohen to sweep an affair with Daniels under the rug ahead of the 2016 presidential election. The Republican presidential nominee faces 34 felony charges in this case for allegedly falsifying business records with the intent to further an underlying crime. Trump has pleaded not guilty on all counts.