Tuesday, December 3, 2024

With plenty of bravado, bombast, and baggage in tow, Kash Patel brings little to his FBI role besides a sketchy background and a strange, warped loyalty to Trump

Kash Patel: Clinging to Trump's coattails (Getty)

Kash Patel, Donald Trump's choice to lead the FBI, has a history of exaggerating his achievements in government service, though he has relatively scant service in such roles. That means Patel, like his soon-to-be boss, has a tortured relationship with the truth, and that does not bode well for the American people, according to a report at The New York Times. Under the headline "Kash Patel Would Bring Bravado and Baggage to F.B.I. Role," Times reporters write:

Few people tapped for any top federal post, much less a job as vital as F.B.I. director, have come with quite so much bravado, bombast or baggage as Kash Patel.

On Saturday, Mr. Patel, 44, a Long Island-born provocateur and right-wing operative, was named by President-elect Donald J. Trump to lead the F.B.I., an agency he has accused of leading a “deep state” witch hunt against Mr. Trump. The announcement amounted to a de facto dismissal of the current director, Christopher A. Wray, who was appointed to the job by Mr. Trump and still has almost three years left on his 10-year term.

Mr. Patel’s maximum-volume threats to exact far-reaching revenge on Mr. Trump’s behalf have endeared him to his boss and Trump allies who say the bureau needs a disrupter to weed out bias and reshape its culture.

But his record as a public official and his incendiary public comments are likely to provoke intense questioning when the Senate weighs his nomination — and determines whether he should run an agency charged with protecting Americans from terrorism, street crime, cartels and political corruption, along with the threat posed by China, which Mr. Wray has described as existential.

Here are some of the things Mr. Patel has said and done that could complicate his confirmation.

In October 2020, Mr. Patel, then a senior national intelligence official in the Trump administration, inserted himself into a secret effort by members of SEAL Team Six to rescue Philip Walton, an American who was 27 at the time and had been kidnapped by gunmen in Niger and taken to Nigeria.

Mr. Patel, whose involvement broke with protocol, assured the State and Defense Departments that the Nigerian government had been told of the operation.

But defense officials could not confirm the approval, and were forced to scramble to obtain the necessary clearance even as the aircraft circled over the target, according to accounts confirmed by a senior defense official familiar with the operation.

Mr. Walton was eventually rescued. But former Defense Secretary Mark T. Esper, writing in his memoir, said that Mr. Patel “made the approval story up,” potentially endangering everyone involved.

In a 2023 book, Mr. Patel supported a plan to greatly weaken the bureau’s central command structure through a range of what he termed “reforms,” including shuttering the bureau’s headquarters and dispersing its staff and leadership to field offices around the country.

“We need to get the F.B.I. the hell out of Washington, D.C.,” wrote Mr. Patel, who has subsequently suggested the building be reopened as a museum to the Trump-slain deep state.

He said he wants to move the headquarters outside the capital and eliminate service in Washington as a step to promotion “to prevent institutional capture and curb F.B.I. leadership from engaging in political gamesmanship.”

Mr. Trump, for his part, does not appear to be on board with that plan. Earlier this year, he opposed moving the F.B.I.’s main offices to Maryland, writing on social media that “THE NEW FBI BUILDING SHOULD BE BUILT IN WASHINGTON, DC.”

The headquarters plan is no lark, however. It is part of a broader strategy, outlined in Mr. Patel’s book, that would entail transferring some decision-making from Washington to lower-ranking Justice Department officials in offices around the country.

Eighty percent of federal employees already work outside the capital.

Current and former officials warn that Patel's plan could marginalize experienced officials responsible for determining the legality, resource allocation. and supervision of important investigations. It could also make it easier for White House officials to apply direct pressure on front-line investigators without interference from superiors, they said.

Mr. Patel, who began his career as federal public defender in Florida, took a job as a prosecutor in the Justice Department’s counterterrorism division in 2014, a move that served as a springboard to prominence and power.

Mr. Patel has repeatedly claimed that during this period he was the “lead prosecutor” in the government’s pursuit of the perpetrators of the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans.

He had no role on the Benghazi trial team. The pretrial investigation was handled by a team led by the F.B.I. and the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington. In his capacity as a junior prosecutor, he routed arrest warrants and the like up the chain for approval, according to multiple people involved in the case.

Mr. Patel, then a House Republican aide, cemented his alliance with Mr. Trump in 2018 when he helped write a memo detailing errors made by the Justice Department in securing surveillance warrants on a Trump adviser suspected of communicating with Russia during the 2016 election.

Mr. Patel was one of the first Trump allies to promote the idea that the investigation was, as he put it in his book, “nothing more than a political hit job.”

His efforts impressed Mr. Trump, who elevated him to a series of jobs in the defense, national security and intelligence establishment — where he chafed against officials with greater experience and institutional distance from Mr. Trump.

While the Justice Department’s inspector general determined that the bureau had acted without political bias, investigators unearthed many mistakes associated with the secret surveillance warrants, a small part of the larger Russia investigation.

A four-year investigation by a special counsel appointed under Mr. Trump, John H. Durham, determined that prosecutors had pursued the case too aggressively because they were convinced of the Trump campaign’s connections to Russia.

But he found no evidence that officials had been motivated by political animus, contrary to claims by Mr. Trump and Mr. Patel, and did not indict any of the senior F.B.I. officials who oversaw the investigation and had been targeted by Mr. Trump’s allies. The report revealed little substantial new information about the inquiry, known as “Crossfire Hurricane.”

Mr. Patel, who was working in the Pentagon during the 2020 election, has consistently promoted Mr. Trump’s false claims that President Biden stole the election.

He was so active in promoting falsehoods, and so wired in with the White House, that his superiors at the Defense Department took notice.

Gen. Mark A. Milley, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, summoned Mr. Patel and another Trump-allied aide to warn them against violating the sacrosanct separation of the military from politics, according to an account in The New Yorker.

Over the past four years, Mr. Patel has continued to echo Mr. Trump’s election falsehoods — and has gone so far as to suggest he would target journalists who dispelled the false claims if he ever returned to power.

“Yes, we’re going to come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens, who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections — we’re going to come after you,” he said last year in an interview with Stephen K. Bannon, the former Trump adviser. “Whether it’s criminally or civilly, we’ll figure that out.”

Mr. Patel stuck close to Mr. Trump during their four years out of power — politically and commercially.

He operates the Kash Foundation, a nonprofit that he has said offers financial help to a range of recipients, including the families of people charged for their roles in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

Mr. Patel has also devoted much of his time to personal moneymaking ventures. He established a consulting company that has collected about $465,000 from Mr. Trump’s social-media company and political action committee.

Like Mr. Trump, Mr. Patel has embraced online retail (under the brand “K$H,” a logo he displays on his lapel and a scarf he often wears at Trump events). He has hawked wooden plaques, “Warrior Essentials” anti-vaccine diet supplements and pro-Trump T-shirts.

None of these wares is as striking as Mr. Patel’s line of children’s books, in which he portrays himself as a wizard of the Gandalf type, wearing a midnight blue robe covered with glittering stars and half moons.

Mr. Trump, broad-shouldered and crowned, is known as “the King.”

Monday, December 2, 2024

Trump pulls Kash Patel and Charles Kushner out of his fanny for big-time jobs; they both appear clueless as leaders, but at least they can kiss Trump's golden butt

Kash Patel: Clueless at the FBI (Getty)

Donald Trump made it clear over the weekend that his idea of building a government rests on loyalty to him (and not necessarily to the Constitution or the rule of law) and a willingness to take risky (and often unproductive) "swings for the fences" when initiating highly coveted change.

The first sign of this approach came on Saturday when Trump named real-estate developer Charles Kushner -- father of Trump's son-law, Jared -- as ambassador to France. Less than six hours later, Trump announced he picked Kash Patel, one of the hardest of his first-term hardliners, as FBI director. That means the incumbent, Chris Wray, who's just over seven years into a 10-year term (so the job could transcend any one presidency), likely will resign or be fired. My hope is that Wray will refuse to leave. It would be amusing to see Trump have to pay two FBI directors at the same time.

Axios sought to place the stunning developments in perspective under the headline "Behind the Curtain: Trump's shock and awe." In my view, the Axios analysis is too kind to Trump. The Kushner appointment reeks of pure, smelly nepotism. The Patel appointment indicates Trump gave zero consideration to fitness or qualifications for the position in question. Patel is a lawyer, and he has a smidgen of government experience. But his public statements make it clear he knows nothing about the U.S. Constitution or the rule of law. I submit that an FBI director should know a thing or two about those subjects. After all, Patel is crowing that he is "coming after" people he considers to be Trump's enemies, but we are unaware of any evidence that has surfaced to support such claims, and even if there were, it is unlikely it would support a civil action or criminal investigation/prosecution. If Trump, Patel, and attorney-general nominee Pam Bondi persist with the notion of bringing cases that have no basis in fact or law, they could wind up in deep legal doo-doo of their own making. Impeachment, time behind bars, large civil judgments, or a combination of all three could be headed their way.

Trump's latest personnel moves provide the strongest evidence yet that his second term is a disaster in the making. How, for example, is an administration supposed to function effectively when it is littered with "leaders" who are incompetent? My guess is that it won't function effectively, and Trump probably doesn't care, because he has stated many times that his second go-round will be driven by his personal grievances and his desire for retribution. How is that going to help regular Americans? It won't, and Trump doesn't intend for it to help you or me. As you might expect from a malignant narcissist, Trump plans for his second term to be all about him. Why did serious, thinking Americans go to the polls and vote for a scheme that will likely be a frightful waste of time and money -- an exercise in "walking in place," at best? My best guess is many Americans weren't serious about the 2024 election and they weren't thinking when they went to the polls. After all, we all knew, or had reason to know, ahead of Nov. 5 that Trump was a convicted felon, adjudicated rapist, a serial abuser of women, a confessed (caught on video) perpetrator of sexual assault, a business cheat, a glorified mobster . . . and the list goes on. Americans knowingly supported a guy with that kind of rap sheet, suggesting they approve of such behavior? I still find it hard to believe -- but perhaps I hold my fellow Americans in higher regard  than they deserve. Maybe we are just a nation of dunces and whiners, who find Trump's rally-like minstrel show to be amusing and laugh when he calls those who fought for our freedoms (including my father) to be "suckers" and "losers." From the Axios piece:

Two seemingly unrelated behind-the-scenes Mar-a-Lago dramas capture the shock soon to pound Washington, Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei write in a "Behind the Curtain" column:

  • Elon Musk, the most powerful and persistent voice in President-elect Trump's ear, has been relentless in pushing "radical reform" of, well, almost everything. As he sits next to Trump discussing administration picks, Musk often asks if the person embodies "radical reform" — massive cuts and blow-it-up-to-rebuild instincts.
  • Trump has been telling friends he denied Robert Lighthizer — his pro-tariff, China-hawk U.S. trade representative in the first term — a Cabinet role because he's "too scared to go big." He's loyal but too timid to take big, risky swings, Trump contends.

Why it matters: Trump advisers are running out of words to describe what's coming in January. They say he feels empowered and emboldened, vindicated and validated, and eager to stretch the boundaries of power.

  • He's egged on by Musk and others — and picking trusted brawlers for the toughest, most controversial tasks.

 You got a big taste of this Saturday:

  1. Trump named real estate developer Charles Kushner — father of Trump's son-in-law, Jared — as ambassador to France. During the final month of his first term, Trump pardoned Charles Kushner, who had served federal time after being prosecuted by Chris Christie for preparing false tax returns, witness retaliation and making false statements to the FEC.
  2. Less than six hours later, Trump announced he picked Kash Patel, one of the hardest of his first-term hardliners, as FBI director. That means the incumbent, Chris Wray, who's just over seven years into a 10-year term (so the job could transcend any one presidency), will resign or be fired. A transition insider told us the Patel pick is a "personal message to the left that was cheering on Jack Smith" — the special counsel who was prosecuting Trump, and plans to step down before Trump can fire him.

According to Axios, many Trumpers actually like the way he is handling the transition, picking one unfit buffoon after another. (Are these people sick?):

Between the lines: Many in Trump's inner circle are gleeful at the aggressiveness of the Cabinet picks — former Fox News co-host Pete Hegseth, a decorated Army veteran who now faces questions about his treatment of women, to lead the Pentagon ... RFK Jr. to head HHS ... and former Democratic congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard as director of national intelligence.

  • All of them want to disrupt the organizations they've been picked to lead. Patel told podcaster Shawn Ryan: "I'd shut down the FBI Hoover Building on Day 1, and reopen the next day as a museum of the Deep State." Patel told MAGA podcast warrior Steve Bannon last year: "We're going to come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections. We're going to come after you, whether it's criminally or civilly."
  • The transition insider told us Trump "no longer listens to people, usually senators, who tell him 'that's not how it's done' or 'it doesn't work that way.' He no longer accepts that rationale."

"Every day is Christmas Day," Steve Bannon told us during an early flurry of announcements. "We are fixed bayonets on these nominations."

  • Bannon called Patel, who sells pro-Trump merch with "K$H" logos, his "One AND Only!!" choice to lead the FBI.
  • After yesterday's announcements, Bannon texted us, as if he were dictating old-school headlines: "Wildest Dreams — Now to Darkest Nightmare as the Established Order Goes Scorched Earth to Defeat the President During Confirmation ... MAGA Best @ Scorched Earth Battles."

If you listen closely to Trumpers, you can easily reach the conclusion these people just aren't very sharp. But this was no surprise to the late, great George Carlin. He had it all figured out:

Now there’s one thing you might have noticed I don’t complain about: politicians. Everybody complains about politicians. Everybody says they suck. Well, where do people think these politicians come from? They don’t fall out of the sky. They don’t pass through a membrane from “another reality.” They come from American parents, and American families, American homes, American schools, American churches, American businesses, and American universities. And they’re elected by American citizens. This is the best we can do folks. This is what we have to offer. It’s what our system produces: Garbage in. Garbage out. If you have selfish ignorant citizens… If you have selfish ignorant citizens, you’re going to get selfish ignorant leaders. And term limits ain’t going to do you any good. You’re just going to wind up with a brand new bunch of selfish, ignorant Americans. So maybe… maybe… MAYBE, it’s not the politicians who suck. Maybe something else sucks around here like: “THE PUBLIC.” Yeah the public sucks. There’s a nice campaign slogan for somebody: “The public sucks, fuck hope.” Fuck hope. Because if it’s really just the fault of these politicians, then where are all the other bright people of conscience? Where are all the bright, honest, intelligent Americans ready to step in and save the nation and lead the way? We don’t have people like that in this country. Everybody’s at the mall scratching his ass, picking his nose, taking his credit card out of a fanny pack, and buying a pair of sneakers with lights in them. So I have solved this little political dilemma for myself in a very simple way: On election-day, I-STAY-HOME. I don’t vote. Fuck ’em. FUCK THEM. I don’t vote. Two reasons. Two reasons I don’t vote: First of all, it’s meaningless. This country was bought and sold and paid for a long time ago. The shit they shuffle around every four years doesn’t mean a fuckin’ thing. And secondly, I don’t vote ’cause I believe if you vote, you have no right to complain. People like to twist that around. I know, they say: “Well, if you don’t vote you have no right to complain.” But where’s the logic in that? If you vote, and you elect dishonest, incompetent people, and they get into office and screw everything up, well you are responsible for what they have done, YOU caused the problem, you voted them in, you have no right to complain. I on the other hand, who did not vote, WHO DID NOT VOTE. Who, in fact, did not even leave the house on election-day, am in no way responsible for what these people have done, and have every RIGHT to complain as loud as I want, about the mess YOU created, that I had nothing to do with. So I know that a little later on this year, you’re going to have another one of those really swell presidential elections that you like so much. You enjoy yourselves. It will be a lot of fun. I’m sure as soon as the election is over, your country will “improve” immediately. As for me, I’ll be home on that day, doing essentially the same thing as you, the only difference is, when I get finished masturbating, I’m going to have a little something to show for it folks.

What is Trump's transition train wreck all about? Allen and VandeHei have that one figured out:

Chemistry with Trump is a huge factor in the most controversial picks, Mike and Jim write.

  • "These are people that get him and understand him," a longtime Trump confidant told us. "Last time, there were lots of people who didn't understand the vision or buy into the vision."

Another transition source tells us Patel was close to being named deputy FBI director, which would have been much less confrontational. But the former frontrunner for the job, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, flunked his Mar-a-Lago meeting with Trump.

  • Bailey "looked the part" but "just didn't have the presence in the room," we're told.

The big picture: A tweet by Musk this past week captured the Mar-a-Lago vibe. "It's this time or never," he said about structural reform of the federal government.

  • Musk, who said in 2018 that he was sleeping on a Tesla factory floor to stay on top of a production problem, has made Mar-a-Lago his new factory floor. He says the incoming administration is working "7 days a week."
  • We're told Musk is pressing to instantly upend agencies by keeping the fewest possible people — like he did when he bought Twitter, now X.

Trump confidants tell us their plans are radical only compared to the status quo. "We're looking for a return to normalcy," the insider said. "Nothing radical. Used to be common sense in this country (and every country) that you take care of your people first before getting generous with others."

  • "There are a million examples of things that need to be taken care of at home before we look past our shores, and we're gonna focus on those things," the insider added.

Reality check: Patel faces a potentially explosive Senate confirmation fight.

  • "Current and former law-enforcement officials," The New York Times notes, "have worried that a second Trump term would feature an assault on the independence and authority of the F.B.I. and the Justice Department, and for many of them, Mr. Patel's ascension to the director's role would confirm the worst of those fears."