Leaderboard 728 X 90

Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Gay-porn photograph No. 3 shows true artistic growth as U.S. Circuit Judge Bill Pryor introduces a gourd to his oeuvre of nudie images from the 1980s

Bill Pryor and his gourd

As each nude photograph of U.S. Circuit Judge Bill Pryor surfaces, you can see Pryor grow as a gay-porn artiste. We're not kidding.

Photo No. 1 was nothing more than Pryor and his erection. Not much going on there, but it was a start.

Photo No. 2 was Pryor sitting on a block of wood. ("He's got wood, get it?") That's an artistic statement on the Beavis and Butt-Head level, but it shows the beginnings of some depth in the Pryor oeuvre.

Photo No. 3, to which we introduce you now (right), shows signs of real growth. It features Pryor, with his ever-present schlong (of which he seems quite proud), holding what appears to be a gourd. (A full-blown, NSFW version of the photo can be viewed by clicking on a link at the end of this post.)

But wait, it's not just any old gourd. Someone appears to have drawn a face on the gourd -- two eyes, a nose, hair, maybe lips. The hair is styled a bit like Pryor's, so maybe we have a self portrait -- Pryor's face on a gourd, with his schlong co-starring in all of its glory.

This is the artistic equivalent of playing a Beatles record backward in the late '60s so you could hear "I buried Paul." (Yes, I tried that; no, I never heard anything but static.) Nobody seems to know what it means, but it sure is weird so . . . hey, that's cool.

What kind of intellect does it take to be considered for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court? Bill Pryor seems to provide the answer: You have to be able to draw a face on a gourd and hold it up for the camera, while your schlong is on full display.

That sets the bar pretty darned low doesn't it? Just what we need in an era of Donald Trump, "alternative facts," and complete lack of respect for the rule of law.

Our crack Legal Schnauzer researchers are scouring Europe-based porn sites to find the remaining images in the Pryor gallery; they reportedly total eight to 12. We hope to have a full set within the next two or three months.


Bill Pryor NSFW No. 3

40 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm still waiting for someone to come up with other pictures of the judge made around the same time frame these photos were. School photos, any other photos of the judge that were made around the same times of the bad puppy photos. We could compare the two sets to see for ourselves if the two were the same. Did they have the same hair styles, same lazy eye, same thin body frame. The fact that this has been going on this long without anyone posting other photos of the same age period is beginning to make me question if this is the judge. Anyone? It's time to show your cards. If those photos were to come out showing the same person, then I think the judge would have some explaining to do. Without being able to compare, he can keep on saying, that's not me.

Anonymous said...

Two "articles" back-to-back "exposing" an Ashley Madison "customer" and posting nude photos of "Bill Pryor."

Make sure that "Support the Schnauzer - Donate" button is active---the one your wife advertises on her facebook page. you've baited the waters. Hopefully you'll catch some prizes.

Anonymous said...

Can't stop laughing. Been laughing all morning, but just now got a break to comment. Bill Pryor with a gourd! Can't stop laughing . . .

Anonymous said...

My only regret is that Trump didn't nominate Pryor for SCOTUS. This is administration is such a joke, might as well go all the way with the Pryor gourd photo.

Anonymous said...

Liquid coming out of my nose . . . going to hurt myself laughing!

Anonymous said...

Schnauzer, these Pryor photos just keep getting better. A block of wood, a gourd. What's next, a stapler, rock, paper and scissors?

Anonymous said...

Best . . . post . . . ever . . .

Anonymous said...

"Photo No. 2 was Pryor sitting on a block of wood. ("He's got wood, get it?") That's an artistic statement on the Beavis and Butt-Head level, but it shows the beginnings of some depth in the Pryor oeuvre."

Hysterical stuff, Schnauzer! You outdid yourself with this one.

Gourd said...

Why are people laughing at me? What did I do to deserve this? I was just lying outside on the ground, in Monroe, LA, when this guy with a bulge in his pants walked by and picked me up. Next thing I know, I'm in front of a camera, and I thought this psycho was going to do something really perverted with me. Now, my family will see my picture all over the InnerWebs.

Anonymous said...

You can't hide your crossed eyes

And your gourd is a thin disguise

Thought by now you'd realize

There ain't no way to hide your crossed eyes.

Anonymous said...

7:40:

I think you are the only person on the planet who has any doubt about who this is. LS has run a taped interview with the law-enforcement guy who was involved in investigating this. This story is about way more than comparing pictures.

legalschnauzer said...

I should mention that I have more posts coming that feature the law-enforcement official who was in the middle of this.

Anonymous said...

#7:40 -- You think people can't change hairstyles? Hell, Pryor could be wearing a wig in this photo, for all any of us knows.

Anonymous said...

10:58 --

What's your problem? You have a problem with people donating to a blog that does good work, whose author had the courage to face jail in order to stand up to corrupt officials? You think that's not Bill Pryor? You think it's not relevant that "churchy" types wind up trolling for tail on Ashley Madison?

Are you just a "smart ass," or do you have some legit complaint?

Anonymous said...

I have a friend who has been connected to Alabama politics for years, and he says Pryor admitted to ABI officials that was him, and he even told them it was taken in Monroe, LA, while he was in college. I realize this is second and third hand stuff, but my friend said the ABI guys didn't really have to track it to Monroe or question who it was. Pryor told them it was him, and where the photo came from.

Anonymous said...

I think 10:58 is jealous that Schnauzer is accomplishing something for justice in this country, while 10:58 probably lives a life that is utterly useless.

Anonymous said...

Bill Pryor to self:

"I knew I should have kept that SOB in jail."

Anonymous said...

The GOURD is a COCONUT.

Anonymous said...

Are you dense, 7:40. Schnauzer himself got kidnapped and thrown in jail for five months when he first exposed Pryor. You think regular people are going to risk that kind of fallout by publishing photos of Pryor? Sheesh!

Anonymous said...

Please let your readers know where photos 2 and 3 came from. Give credit where it's due.

Thank you for posting them.

legalschnauzer said...

@12:56 --

Are you sure about that? I thought coconuts were dark and hairy on the outside. You might be right, but I'm still leaning toward a gourd. Probably would help if the photo were in color. I think some gourds are pretty colorful -- green, yellow, etc.

Steve said...

Roger. I am sure that is a coconut. The brown hairy nut you are familiar with comes off the tree wrapped in a thick green skin.Google it.
The center of the nut Billy had in his hand kind of resembles something that Billy had a deep interest in!

Anonymous said...

LS@1:03--This is the coconut seed pod. The hairy coconut is another layer down. And since this is a B&W photo, it's hard to tell what color the outside pod is.

legalschnauzer said...

1:00 --

I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean post the Web sites they came from or the names of the people who sent them to me? If you are talking about the latter, I have reservations about that. Hope you will keep in mind that I was beaten up in my own home, falsely arrested and imprisoned after I tracked down Pryor pix No. 1 and published it. This is dangerous stuff, largely because Pryor is connected to what amounts to organized crime. I don't want to put any individuals at risk by publicly tying them to these photographs. Hope you understand. There are really bad people who don't want these photos out there, and I don't want anyone to be hurt the way I've been hurt.

legalschnauzer said...

Steve and @3:15 --

Thanks for your insights. Sounds like you know more about this stuff than I do. We'll go with a coconut then. Maybe that has some connections to the message Billy was trying to send. Reminds me of that song Harry Nilsson did years ago from his classic Nilsson Schmilsson album. Think the title was "Coconut." Will have to check on that.


"Put de lime in de coconut, and drink 'em both up")

legalschnauzer said...

@12:40 --

I know who @10:48 is. He's a sorry sack of feces who had every opportunity to come down on the side of justice and chose to side with crooks. He's going to regret that decision, big time, someday. He's lived a useless, meaningless life, and he's bitter if anyone supports Carol or me -- financially, emotionally, or in any other way. He's a useless slug on the sidewalk of life. Let him simmer in his own nasty juices.

Coconut said...

I'm upset that the author of this blog got me confused with a gourd. What a disgrace! What did I do to deserve such public humiliation? First, I wound up in gay porn circles for about 35 years, and now the goose who writes this blog calls me a gourd. Aaarrrrrgh!

Anonymous said...

I certainly don't want my name published and I certainly hope that you have not discovered my name by devious means.

You could say for example: "I did not find Pictures 2 and 3 myself. They were sent to me by an anonymous reader, who had an independent recollection of the pictures. He wishes to remain anonymous."

legalschnauzer said...

@6:01 --

I hear you, and I hope your comment above let's folks know that sharp-minded readers tracked down these photos. I think I've said in previous posts or comments (or both) that I had lots of help on these recent Pryor posts. If I haven't, or if it wasn't made clear, let me make it clear now: Anonymous readers tracked down these photos and helped me make them public. I hope they will be able to track down other photos.

To be sure, I have not discovered your name and haven't tried. As noted earlier, I want to help ensure your privacy and your safety. I appreciate the help you've provided very much.

Anonymous said...

Agree with 7:40 with regard to verifying your posted photos are Pryor. You obviously dig deep on your stories. The lack of any independent photographic evidence of what Pryor looked like around this time is a fallacy to your allegation the photos are of Pryor. Relying upon an unnamed source who says that Pryor admitted the photos were him is weak. As hard as the Senate Judiciary Committee came after Pryor during his confirmation hearings and this issue never came up (after the FBI colonoscopy of everything about him) supports the conclusion that your allegations these photos are of Pryor are baseless. I know you will attack me with name calling, and I don't care about that. Come forward with proof of your allegations.

legalschnauzer said...

@9:30 --

You're a little late to the party, Cowboy.

a. Bill Pryor himself was given every opportunity to provide "independent photographic evidence" that the photos weren't him. That's why I've asked multiple times to interview him on the subject. He surely has school/family photos, etc., but he's never granted an interview. Meanwhile, I interviewed a half dozen or more knowledgeable sources who said that was him, the "Bill Pryor" who now is a judge.

b. That's called journalism. If it's not enough to suit you, conduct your own investigation. I don't care what you do. I've done the legwork to know that is Bill Pryor. You can go to search engine at top of this blog and key in "Bill Pryor nude" or "Bill Pryor gay" and see the results of all that work.

c. I've never said an unnamed source stated that Pryor admitted the photos were of him. A commenter here said that.

d. Try going to one gay-porn site, like badpuppy, and get a feel for the volume of gay-porn images that is out there. It's huge, and the chance of any agency finding the Bill Pryor photos is truly a needle-in-the-haystack situation. Plus, you overstate the ability of FBI and Congressional investigators. The DOJ was corrupt from top to bottom in the Bush years, and it's no better now under Trump, so no reason to think those dumb bells could find their butts with a road map. Even if they found it, a Rove-influenced dept. probably would be convinced to keep it under wraps. DOJ has evidence Don Siegelman was railroaded, and they've refused to turn it over. You actually trust that crowd?

e. As I've said, this never has been a story just about photos, and people saying, "Oh, I think it's him" or "Oh, I don't think it's him." It's a work of journalism, the kind that isn't scared off by threats from conservative scumbags that run Alabama.

f. I've talked to at least three people who were in ULM with Pryor, including one who was in band with him, and they say the photo is him. One male source claimed to have had a sexual encounters with Pryor. The band member said Pryor's homosexual excursions were well known among other gay members.

g. The evidence on this is overwhelming. If it makes you feel better to be a contrarian, then go that route. I've done the legwork to know the truth. Do your own legwork if you feel like it. Doesn't matter to me, one way or another.

Anonymous said...

I am interested in this matter because I know lots of people like this putative Bill Pryor; hypocritical, self-loathing, sanctimonious, self-righteous sons-of-bitches and bastards who live one life with their families and drive around to wooded parks and other places of resort at night to fulfill their daytime fantasies. These people, like the ones I know, live compartmented lives and say that one life has nothing to do with the other. They can pray and clap their hands on Sunday morning and drive down to the bushes on Sunday night and feel nothing akin to shame or remorse. Then one day they approach an undercover agent and get arrested and bring shame and scandal on their innocent wives and children. I've seen this happen many hundreds, if not thousands of times.

The issue here is not whether this putative Bill Pryor is gay himself or not. The issue is having, or not having, posed for nude erotic photographs, which became public, although they were not supposed to become public, and having lied about it and denied it.

Another thought about this putative Bill Pryor, who in the nude pictures is definitely young, perhaps late high school or early college years, is that young people do stupid things against their better judgments, which they later regret and hope will never become public. This describes some of the most virulent homophobes (homohaters) that I know. Some are enticed into doing things such as posing for naked photographs then feel remorseful and resent the enticers, or seducers, and develop very virulent attitudes toward them. Then they marry women and have children and look over their shoulders all their lives, to see if anybody is going to out them..Both gays and straights do it. I know many such people. Maybe this putative Bill Pryor was one of these people and that is the reason for his virulent homohatred.

legalschnauzer said...

@10:01 --

I think you've done a pretty thorough psychological analysis. Quite insightful.

Robert Morrow said...

" I've seen this happen many hundreds, if not thousands of times." Anonymous

What do you do for a living? Work at a glory hole?

Robert Morrow

Robert Morrow said...

"I've seen this happen many hundreds, if not thousands of times." - Anonymous

What do you do for a living? Work at a glory hole?

Anonymous said...

Mr. Moderator: Comments like Mr. Morrow's are worthy neither of being posted nor responded to.

Do you approve of them or why are they allowed in your blog?

legalschnauzer said...

I don't necessarily approve of Robert's comment -- or other edgy comments -- but i try to moderate with a "soft hand." I think he was being flippant, which some might find amusing and others might find offensive. I don't think it's grounds for deleting his comment.

It's his effort at a form of humor that involves hyperbole. It's not everyone's cup of tea, but I don't think it's meant to be taken seriously.

Anonymous said...

It's hard to believe that this vulgarity and grossness pass for humor anywhere. It must be a southern type of humor.

I thought that this was a place for serious discussion and comment.

I shall not correspond with you any further.

legalschnauzer said...

I wasn't aware you were corresponding with me in the first place. You don't put your name on your comments, so I have no idea who you are. You asked me to explain why I posted the Robert Morrow comment, and I explained it. Not sure why you are in such a huff. Maybe you need to lighten up a little. As for the use of hyperbole and exaggeration in humor, that's hardly a Southern thing. The late Don Rickles was a master at it, and he hardly was from the South.

Robert Morrow said...

Anonymouse, the movie Stripes has a great line. It is from Sgt. Yulka who says "Lighten up, Francis."