Leaderboard 728 X 90

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Oil Is About to Pay a Visit to Alabama's Coast

Alabama, which perhaps has sucked up to corporate interests more than any other state over the past 15 to 20 years, is about to pay a huge price.

The Associated Press reports that oil from the massive BP leak is forecast to hit Alabama's shores for the first time on Wednesday afternoon.

Reports AP:

A forecast map issued Monday by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shows a light sheen of oil completely covering the mouth of Mobile Bay and coming ashore in Baldwin County by noon Wednesday.

The NOAA maps note that moderate south to southwest winds are forecast for the upcoming week, which "indicate that oil may move north to threaten the barrier islands off Mississippi and Alabama."

How bad could it get?

"I think it's uncharted territory for everybody," said Bethany Kraft, the director of the Alabama Coastal Foundation.

It is deeply ironic that oil is about to befoul Alabama's gorgeous beaches as voters go to the polls today in our state's primary election. Thousands of Alabama voters will reflexively pull the lever for the very Republican candidates who are backed by corporate interests, the same interests whose malfeasance has brought disaster to the Gulf of Mexico.

How strong is big oil's grip on Alabama politics? Consider the Alabama Supreme Court's ruling in November 2007 that, in an 8-1 vote, overturned most of a $3.5 billion fraud verdict against ExxonMobil.

All eight justices who voted to overturn the verdict are Republicans. And who provided much of their funding. Scott Horton, of Harper's, tells us in a piece called "The Best Justice Money Can Buy."

First, Horton notes that Karl Rove and his buddy Bill Canary, president of the Business Council of Alabama, launched a campaign in 1992 to take over Alabama's appellate courts. Did it work? Well, 13 of the 14 justices on the Alabama Supreme Court and Alabama Court of Civil Appeals now are Republicans.

Does having "pro business" justices make a difference? ExxonMobil undoubtedly would say yes. Reports Horton:

So who funded the G.O.P.’s vise-like grip on the Alabama Supreme Court? The answer is complex, but part of it is: Exxon Mobil did.

In the last six years, Republican candidates for the state’s highest court have taken more than $5.5 million in campaign contributions from Exxon Mobil lobbyists and lawyers, and groups allied with the company. That means that the eight judges who voted to throw out the state’s massive jury award against Exxon Mobil were actually placed on the court with Exxon Mobil’s money and support—though that support is almost all carefully funnelled in an indirect way, of course. Just think about it from a corporate perspective—an investment of $5.5 million to eliminate a $3.6 billion liability? The best investment those oil men ever made.

Where exactly did that $5.5 million come from? Horton reports:

• Tort-reform groups whose leadership include Exxon lobbyists, or who were funded indirectly by the company, made nearly $3 million in contributions to the GOP members of the Supreme Court.

• Seven Political Action Committees controlled by Exxon’s Alabama lobbyists, Fine Geddie & Associates, made $293,000 in direct campaign contributions to the Supreme Court justices who ruled in the company’s favor.

• Alabama lawyers who represent Exxon in the gas royalties suit gave thousands of dollars more to the justices who ruled in favor of Exxon in the case.

And then we have this:

• The biggest corporate trade group in Alabama, Billy Canary’s Business Council of Alabama, also contributed at least $2.1 million to the GOP justices who ruled favorably to Exxon.

Bradley Byrne, who figures to come out on top in today's Republican primary and probably will win the general election in November, has strong ties to . . . the Business Council of Alabama.

Consider this from Byrne's campaign Web site:

During Bradley’s tenure in the Alabama senate, two of the state’s strongest advocates for legal reform, the Alabama Civil Justice Reform Committee and the Business Council of Alabama, frequently called on him to sponsor and work for passage of important legal reform legislation.

The campaign Web site tells us that Byrne has spent much of his legal career defending corporate titans:

Bradley Byrne practiced law as a respected defense attorney for 27 years. As a member of the Alabama Senate, Bradley was the leading advocate for lawsuit reform in the legislature. In fact, he was awarded for his leadership in fighting for legal reform by leading business and industry organizations.

So here is what we have in Alabama today. Voters are likely to vote heavily for Bradley Byrne, a candidate supported by big oil and other business interests. Meanwhile, oil is about to start lapping up on Alabama's shores, especially in Baldwin County, which is Byrne's home territory.

Message for Alabamians: You pay a price when you exhibit cluelessness at the ballot box. If you don't believe it, just check out our shoreline over the next several weeks.

For almost 20 years, Alabama citizens have consistently voted for Bradley Byrne types who say they want "lawsuit reform." That reform, of course, means that businesses are allowed to do pretty much anything they want in Alabama.

What do we have to show for it? It looks like, in a matter of a few days, we'll have oily beaches.

So why do we keep voting for Bradley Byrne types? As Dr. Phil might say, "And how . . . is that . . . working out . . . for you?"

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well, looks like the Republican- loving ignorant that voted so solidly for Raygun and Bush the smarter and Bush the lesser now get to eat--literally--the results of their votes. Of course they get to breath it sooner--it's on the winds now, which are yet to reverse with the winds and waves of summer's tropical storms and drive the lighter crude volatiles way upstate. It it crsoose state lines with a hurricane, maybe the Gulf should be nuked to keep the kill zone where it belongs.

Yep, it may be a good thing that Bush the lesser repealed country of origin labeling laws for foods sold in America, so we can all chew a little more comfortably on the chemical-fed chicken being shipped in from China, since US foods will likely be even more toxic in a few more months. Ever wonder what happens to fish and meat unfit for human consumption? It winds up as feed- and feed additives for animals for human consumption. But, why worry, Alabama? Most of you don't agree you are even animals, or understand 'evilution' so I guess you can begin with simple food web understandings as the whole Gulf becomes the Dead Sea. Maybe you can elect some new fake cattle rancher flunky oil man to tell you America is still God's Chosen People ad get more gubermint regularlations off yer (corporate overlords) backs...just don't study any toxicology--we don't want you moving away from the Gulf. Someone's got to clean this mess up, and it should start with the lungs of the one's that 'bringed it on.'

...just call me Angry in Appalachia. PS we would deal very directly with such homicidal company leaders here--it doesn't matter how rich they are, how big the payroll, or how 'smart' the foreign accent sounds. Too bad the coast has devolved in to such stupid spineless people who don't have any concern for America. Hope you enjoy your big boats bought with your oil wages when the Gulf becomes(p)eutrophic and you can't get near the water, much less survive in the sea breezes... May you live in hell, here and now for what you've allowed.

Starkville Bible Student said...

Mississippi is catching it too, and Barbour is no better. I have no doubt that he will defend BP against all the interests of Mississippians. After all, 'bidness = good, gubmint = bad'.