tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post7955444383525853385..comments2024-03-12T21:13:06.850-05:00Comments on Legal Schnauzer: Eviction proceedings in Missouri cannot begin until a tenant is one month behind on rent, so why did our landlord, Trent Cowherd, try to evict 25 days too early?legalschnauzerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comBlogger55125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-20914101483458191902017-04-01T23:49:42.209-05:002017-04-01T23:49:42.209-05:00Good for you to leave it here, so you won't ge...Good for you to leave it here, so you won't get your ass kicked any worse than it's already been kicked.<br /><br />Hope your cum dumpling learns some manners, intelligence, and honesty from somewhere because it certainly won't come from you. Example:<br /><br />"More fun to mock you anonymously."<br /><br />Straight from your own comment, but you then claim you aren't here to mock someone.<br /><br />You claim to have made a citation to law, but you clearly haven't. I don't think you even know what a citation is, what it means.<br /><br />"If you weren't so full of shit, you wouldn't have to make things up."<br /><br />How clever. Think I read that on a third-grade bathroom stall one time.<br /><br />Here's an idea: Stay out of legal discussions where you don't belong, and you have no clue what you're talking about. Take that time and maybe drive a javelin up your ass. You might enjoy it.<br /><br />Bottom line: You and your cop buddies, the ones you suck off in your spare time, had no grounds to be at our apartment, and all of you are going to pay for that mistake big time. Enjoy your nice quiet home life while you've got it because you might not have it much longer.<br /><br />You came here and started this conversation, and now you've proven you can't handle it because I'm mean to yew. Well, try watching a bunch of cop thugs almost rip your wife's arm out of its socket. Then, watch them, like a bunch of cowards, try to make bogus statements of law and facts, try to spin things so they can get away with beating up a woman who had done nothing to them. See how much that is, see how much tolerance you have for such garbage for the lowest of the low.<br /><br />You are the lowest of the low, and that's why I feel for your crotch fruit. He/she doesn't stand a chance with a lying worm for a father. And our country is rotting, with lying sacks of shit like you in positions to bully people, and then lie about it, like your buddy Debi Wade in her PC Statement. We'd be better off with Islamic terrorists over here. At least they sorta have a point. There is no point to your life. You are a cheating thug, who then lies to cover up his thuggish ways.<br /><br />You can't manage yourself, then you gift us with your crotch fruit to raise -- because you sure as hell can't do it.<br /><br />Worthless prick! legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-41654663107399403412017-04-01T20:07:42.684-05:002017-04-01T20:07:42.684-05:00". . . says the guy who admitted he was here ...". . . says the guy who admitted he was here only to "mock" someone by making himself look stupid,"<br /><br />I wrote no such thing. If you weren't full of shit, you wouldn't have to make things up. <br /><br />"who can't offer a single citation to support his view of the law, who gets both the facts and law wrong"<br /><br />Again, I posted statutory reference itself, and I've made no statement at all regarding the facts of your case. <br /><br />I'll just leave this here: <br /><br />"Most of us grow out of such behavior by 7th grade or so, but you are still doing it."... <br /><br />"All the world needs is more crotch fruit from 'sperm daddies' like you."<br /><br /> <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-13451905956134843312017-04-01T08:58:19.135-05:002017-04-01T08:58:19.135-05:00. . . says the guy who admitted he was here only t.... . . says the guy who admitted he was here only to "mock" someone by making himself look stupid, who can't offer a single citation to support his view of the law, who gets both the facts and law wrong . . . and then tries to claim some moral high ground.<br /><br />As a confessed "mocker," you have the mindset of a third grader -- and that's an insult to third graders. Do you throw spit balls at people, too?<br /><br />Most of us grow out of such behavior by 7th grade or so, but you are still doing it. What a phony, what a lowlife, what a fraud, what a dumb ass. You would be a perfect fit on any police force I'm aware of.<br /><br />So glad your wife is pregnant. All the world needs is more crotch fruit from "sperm daddies" like you. Get a life, dipshit. How desperate must your wife have been to wind up with a scum like you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-65634110723032175952017-04-01T02:55:04.609-05:002017-04-01T02:55:04.609-05:00You're a case case--your completely ridiculous...You're a case case--your completely ridiculous personal attacks are somehow less ridiculous than your substantive responses.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-25678581573380460702017-03-31T23:52:31.163-05:002017-03-31T23:52:31.163-05:00Memo to 11:31 --
Are you a deputy? You sound lik...Memo to 11:31 -- <br /><br />Are you a deputy? You sound like one. I've yet to meet a law-enforcement officer who was as smart as a lowland gorilla (or a cockroach, for that matter) -- and I've yet to meet one that has any clue about the law. You fit that profile.<br /><br />If you want to argue unlawful-detainer on your Friday night, go find someone who has been involved in such a case. You've got the wrong guy here; I've never been involed in such a case. Not sure why that's so hard for you to understand. I take that back -- if you are a deputy, then I know exactly why you can't understand it. You aren't smart enough.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-48492616000743189022017-03-31T23:22:25.266-05:002017-03-31T23:22:25.266-05:00An "actual lawyer"? You mean there is su...An "actual lawyer"? You mean there is such a thing. I see no reason to believe this Scott fellow knows any more about the law than you do. He makes no citation to law, and neither do you. Best I can tell, he's just another pro-landlord hack like Lowther. <br /><br />Your point is irrelevant because Cowherd filed a rent-and-possession case, the docket shows that, and you admit that requires rent to be at least 30 days late before eviction proceedings can begin. I understand why you want to change the story in mid-stream, but "fake news" doesn't work here, and it doesn't work in a court with an honest judge.<br /><br />The 30-day requirement is a problem for you because it means Cowherd had no grounds to evict us, Lowther screwed up big time, and cops had no grounds to be on the property that day. <br /><br />That creates serious liability for Cowherd, Lowther, the cops, and anyone else involved. No wonder you are trying to spin things.<br /><br />To that, I have a three-word response: "Eat shit, dumbass." <br /><br /> legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-22736338063810459602017-03-31T22:46:17.073-05:002017-03-31T22:46:17.073-05:00You might try relying on an actual lawyer for your...You might try relying on an actual lawyer for your legal advice. <br /><br />http://www.scottlawfirm.com/law.htm#Unlawful_Detainer<br /><br /><br />Pay particular attention to the part about how not paying rent breaches a lease and is therefore grounds for an unlawful detainer action.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-37542278906326061182017-03-31T22:04:46.149-05:002017-03-31T22:04:46.149-05:00Memo to @8:05 and others who might be interested:
...Memo to @8:05 and others who might be interested:<br /><br />Here is the law that @8:05 simply cannot get right -- <br /><br />Unlawful Detainer Suit<br />This is the kind of eviction case used to evict a tenant for “holding over” – not vacating after their lease is over (after the landlord gave proper notice that the lease is ending), or for tenants who have breached the terms of their lease. If a landlord needs to evict for non-payment of rent, he should use the Rent and Possession Eviction Suit above. An Unlawful Detainer Suit proceeds the same way as the Rent and Possession suit, with a Summons issued to the tenant, and a court date.<br /><br />https://www.evictionresources.com/missouri-eviction-process/<br /><br /><br />As already noted, @8:05's "point" is irrelevant because landlord Cowherd filed a rent and possession claim in our case. It's plain as day in the court documents. But @8:05 has nothing better to do on a Friday night than to "mock" someone, when he's really proving himself to be both stupid, lazy, and pathetic, with no social life.<br /> legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-79758814889224792502017-03-31T22:00:31.595-05:002017-03-31T22:00:31.595-05:00@8:14 --
By proving yourself to be a coward and ...@8:14 -- <br /><br />By proving yourself to be a coward and a dunderhead, you are mocking me? Hah, funny. Don't you have anything better to do on a Friday night? Sounds like you need to get a life, bub.<br /><br />Are you one of Jeff Sessions closeted gay lovers? If so, that must make you proud.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-88987436744638312422017-03-31T20:14:02.125-05:002017-03-31T20:14:02.125-05:00"If you want to "challenge" me, res..."If you want to "challenge" me, respond with your real name, contact info, address, etc"<br /><br />More fun to mock you anonymously. <br /><br />Careful, I know Jeff Sessions. I might have him arrest your wife and steal your teeth again and stuff. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-15974096882766130302017-03-31T20:11:18.203-05:002017-03-31T20:11:18.203-05:00* "Also, no, ass." What does that mean?
...* "Also, no, ass." What does that mean?<br /><br />You really need this explained? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-25099184124489124082017-03-31T20:05:05.927-05:002017-03-31T20:05:05.927-05:00Sorry, you're just wrong. I made no misstateme...Sorry, you're just wrong. I made no misstatement of fact, and I correctly described the law. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-64474779893920452782017-03-31T19:36:37.113-05:002017-03-31T19:36:37.113-05:00@5:05 --
* "Also, no, ass." What does ...@5:05 -- <br /><br />* "Also, no, ass." What does that mean? And whose ass are we talking about here?<br /><br />* What allegation are we talking about here? (As you can see, your comment is a model of clarity.)<br /><br />* If you want to "challenge" me, respond with your real name, contact info, address, etc. I will even be glad to talk with you via phone. Otherwise, I don't accept challenges from people who are too cowardly to ID themselves. I already know the excuse you will come up with -- the tired, old, "He's going to be a meanie to me if I reveal my identity." If you can't come up with something more clever than that, don't bother responding. I know you're a puss and a weanie already -- and you're also ignorant of the law. I don't blame you for keeping your ID under wraps.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-36493073542160700962017-03-31T19:31:18.384-05:002017-03-31T19:31:18.384-05:00@4:33 --
My response was painfully coherent for ...@4:33 -- <br /><br />My response was painfully coherent for you. It showed you are a fraud and a dumb ass. <br /><br />You implied that ours was an unlawful detainer case, and it wasn't. Documents filed in the case were for rent and possessions. So, you were wrong on both the facts and the applicable law. You are wrong on unlawful detainer law, but worse yet, you are talking about law that was irrelevant to our case. Nice trick on your part: You are wrong and irrelevant. That's not easy to achieve.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-73343296126903186882017-03-31T17:05:06.236-05:002017-03-31T17:05:06.236-05:00Also, no, ass: I'm challenging you to defend y...Also, no, ass: I'm challenging you to defend you allegation. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-60241012516873856612017-03-31T16:33:03.950-05:002017-03-31T16:33:03.950-05:00...he wrote, lacking a coherent response.
I made......he wrote, lacking a coherent response. <br /><br />I made no statement at all regarding the facts of your case. I'm right on the law. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-51329529429894883612017-03-31T16:05:29.404-05:002017-03-31T16:05:29.404-05:00You want me to explain your incompetence and disho...You want me to explain your incompetence and dishonesty? That's a job for you. Whoever you are, you're wrong on the facts and the law. No surprise there.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-59816259431805771752017-03-31T15:12:33.604-05:002017-03-31T15:12:33.604-05:00Why, if I were the lawyer who filed the case, woul...Why, if I were the lawyer who filed the case, would I have to check the court records to learn the specifics?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-50985054551512602182017-03-31T13:14:02.305-05:002017-03-31T13:14:02.305-05:00Nice try, Lowther. The landlord, Trent Cowherd, fi...Nice try, Lowther. The landlord, Trent Cowherd, filed a rent and possession case. You should know since you filed it for him. Nice to see you admit that, in this case -- a rent and possession case -- requires rent be late by at least 30 days before eviction proceedings can begin.<br /><br />So, we've established that it was a rent and possession case, as I've reported umpteen times, and eviction proceedings were started 25 days too early, meaning Cowherd had no lawful grounds to evict us and sheriff's deputies had no grounds to be at our apartment on 9/9/15. If you had checked the court record, you would have known all this, but I guess you are too lazy to do it. Any other weak arguments you want to come up with? legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-42598424956916689732017-03-31T12:52:54.968-05:002017-03-31T12:52:54.968-05:00You do not have to be 30 days behind in rent to be...You do not have to be 30 days behind in rent to be evicted in Missouri. That statute applies to actions for rent and possession under RSMO 535 et seq. By failing to pay rent on time, you are in breach of your lease and can still be evicted pursuant to an unlawful detainer action under RSMO 524 et seq. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-58974666182260266102017-03-14T00:34:24.747-05:002017-03-14T00:34:24.747-05:00@12:15 --
If you are so honest and honorable, wh...@12:15 -- <br /><br />If you are so honest and honorable, why don't you tell us who your are, your location, profession, etc. You've "always kept your word"? I doubt that, but ID yourself and let us decide if that's true.<br /><br />Aside from that, you are an unreal dunderhead. A few points:<br /><br />(1) Our rent was due by 5:30 p.m. on the first day of each month. We were in the place on Aug. 1 because our rent wasn't due yet. Idiot.<br /><br />(2) We had a pending court case re: our tenancy. We weren't due to be out. Idiot.<br /><br />(3) Eviction proceedings cannot begin until rent is late by one month. Late charges can be assessed, but eviction proceedings cannot begin. You clearly do not know the law -- and owner, brother, judge have no respect for the law. Idiot.<br /><br />(4) Yes, this is about you -- you being an empty-headed moron. Idiot.<br /><br />And here is a sure bet: You also are a pussy, too big a pussy to ID yourself. Of course, if I were as stupid as you are, I wouldn't ID myself either. But then, I wouldn't be leaving ignorant comments like this one, on subjects I know nothing about.<br /><br />Why don't you take a javelin and jam it up your ass.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-18976484755807364902017-03-14T00:15:40.868-05:002017-03-14T00:15:40.868-05:00If the rent was paid through July 31, why were you...If the rent was paid through July 31, why were you in the place August 1? If the rent wasn't paid, you should have been out. That would have been the honorable, honest thing for you to do. I've been a renter and a landlord. I've always kept my word and expected others to keep their word. This isn't about the owner or brother or judge. This is about you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-2358267152822912822017-03-08T01:12:45.710-06:002017-03-08T01:12:45.710-06:00A final point or two, then I promise, I'm done...A final point or two, then I promise, I'm done with you:<br /><br />All of this means:<br /><br />(1) Cowherd had no grounds to seek eviction when he did.<br /><br />(2) The lawyer, Lowther, screwed this up as badly as something can be screwed up.<br /><br />(3) The cops had no grounds to be on our property, under about four provisions of Missouri law.<br /><br />(4) Carol's arm was broken, and we both were terrorized with firearms, by cops who had no grounds to be there -- at the request of a landlord who had no grounds to seek eviction, much less to actually evict.<br /><br />Take your spin and shove it up your ass, you sick bastard.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-90460209377952033252017-03-08T01:08:27.477-06:002017-03-08T01:08:27.477-06:00Mr. Apologist makes a late-night appearance. Not s...Mr. Apologist makes a late-night appearance. Not sure why I posted your nonsense garbage; I guess it's interesting to see how desperate you are to spin this. A point or two, and then I'm done with you:<br /><br />(1) Don't know what "statements" you are referring to. But we had a 13-month lease which started in early July 2014, and our rent was paid through end of July 2015. That's fact.<br /><br />(2) Cowherd filed a rent and possession claim, so they admitted that August rent was due. But they can't file such a claim, under Missouri law, until rent is one month late. They filed claim on Aug. 5, when rent was five days late. They violated state law, and it shows that almost every comment you've made on this matter is uninformed and wildly off target. That's fact.<br /><br />You can't argue any of this, but you try anyway, which is pathetic. A suggestion: Go stick your head in the toilet.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-3225922767432317602017-03-08T00:55:19.768-06:002017-03-08T00:55:19.768-06:00Your lease was over...terminating at the end of Ju...Your lease was over...terminating at the end of July. they required no reason at all to refuse to go month to month. That only happens if both parties are amenable...they gave you thirty days notice to quit. They don't have to rent to you month to month after your lease terminates, they don't need a good reason, although they had one.., you are unqualified torment the property without a co signer. <br /><br />You probably could have negotiated another month, but you whipped out the crazy and combative card right away and burned your bridges.<br /><br />Also you didn't pay your July rent according to statements you have made.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com