tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post2937569437640052190..comments2024-03-12T21:13:06.850-05:00Comments on Legal Schnauzer: Nothing Sticks to Teflon Boblegalschnauzerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-45068483430583320412007-08-25T02:47:00.000-05:002007-08-25T02:47:00.000-05:00Good article. You have the fat attorneys whinning....Good article. You have the fat attorneys whinning. They need to occasionally go to the county library and check out some up to date law books. They have a spotty memory like Gonzales. Their interpretation of the law is weak and they are going to be the ones that will cause Riley to have to serve additional time in prison after he is prosecuted for taking a bribe from Jack Abramoff for taking millions of dollars in donations to his campaign funds. Abramoff's bribe also included Riley discriminating and oppressing the Alabama Poarch Indians for fear that they could become a threat to the Choctaw Indians in Mississippi. This is a very strong case against Riley. If we get new U.S. Attorneys after the next election, I predict that Riley will be prosecuted before he gets out of office. Dan Gans is being investigated for ballot stuffing in Riley's 2002 election who has indicated his involvement and that he was payed to fix votes by Riley.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-10973760362487469162007-08-16T17:26:00.000-05:002007-08-16T17:26:00.000-05:00This one is easy. The incentives that went to the...This one is easy. The incentives that went to the biotech firm in Huntsville were not approved by Riley but by a bipartisan committee that oversees the Capital Improvement Trust Fund. Roger Bedford (Democrat) and John Knight (Democrat) sit on that committee. The vote was unanimous.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-80670762356161892012007-08-16T07:44:00.000-05:002007-08-16T07:44:00.000-05:00Legal, You are beating a dead horse here. There a...Legal, You are beating a dead horse here. There are materials differences that you are overlooking. The first is that great pains were taken to hide the Scrushy/Health South cotribution to the lottery campaign. The controbutions were made after the organization was dissolved and was not reported on campaign finance documents until more than a year after the controbutions had been made and after they LAW mandated that they be reported. The biotech PAC's contribution was reported openly and according to the law. <BR/><BR/>Second, Siegleman's behavior in office raised many questions that warranted an investigation. The sale of his Montgomery home for twice it's value, gifts not reported (motorcycle and trailor), sweetheart deals for Siegelman supporters that cost the state a whole lot of money. <BR/><BR/>I think anyone who reads this blog (and judging from the dearth of comments I suspect that there aren't that many)understands very quickly that you have only jumped on this bandwagon because of your irrational hatred of Bill Swatek. You have no credibility and the more you rant the less credibility you generate.Randi Bateshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15934282757275252734noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-68403174358461783532007-08-16T00:13:00.000-05:002007-08-16T00:13:00.000-05:00To understand how misguided you truly are, I sugge...To understand how misguided you truly are, I suggest you read my other post on your earlier note about the Siegelman letter to Riley. It's a shame that you and other bloggers like you work so hard to distort the facts of certain issues in hopes of persuading others, yet you are too lazy to dig up the real facts that can so easily disprove what you say.<BR/><BR/>Such intellectual dishonesty is a waste of my time, and your commentary is fast becoming the same.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com