tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post7068654251028690574..comments2024-03-12T21:13:06.850-05:00Comments on Legal Schnauzer: "Spotlight's" Oscar win inspires, but it's a reminder that investigative journalism is on life support, reporters face danger, and scandals go unreportedlegalschnauzerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comBlogger50125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-27729478407435170882016-03-11T16:08:28.201-06:002016-03-11T16:08:28.201-06:00I see, @2:08. Are you thinking Wingo or Johnson or...I see, @2:08. Are you thinking Wingo or Johnson or someone connected to the loan story is getting "sugar" on the side?legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-47000532441640752132016-03-11T16:07:18.348-06:002016-03-11T16:07:18.348-06:00Don't know, @2:03. Haven't heard from him ...Don't know, @2:03. Haven't heard from him in ages.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-55410106528710845142016-03-11T14:08:54.523-06:002016-03-11T14:08:54.523-06:00"Sugar" might well refer to a sugar dadd..."Sugar" might well refer to a sugar daddy relationship with someone, a man or a woman. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-57974869160842236552016-03-11T14:03:12.975-06:002016-03-11T14:03:12.975-06:00You mentioned your brother. What is the status of ...You mentioned your brother. What is the status of his attempt to have you can Carol declared incapacitated and disabled? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-28403582892557976022016-03-10T11:10:26.959-06:002016-03-10T11:10:26.959-06:00Thanks for the link, @10:46. I don't know a lo...Thanks for the link, @10:46. I don't know a lot about this payday loan issue. Rich Wingo played linebacker at UA under Bear Bryant, didn't he? Did Wingo play in the Sugar Bowl--is that what you mean about "sugar"?<br /><br />I thought Neal Berte's comments were interesting.<br /><br />What do you make of Johnson/Wingo connections? Would welcome your insights.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-24232600114673556772016-03-10T11:06:13.610-06:002016-03-10T11:06:13.610-06:00Interesting, @10:50. You might be onto something. ...Interesting, @10:50. You might be onto something. Please feel free to share more details as they come to mind.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-3394951819747817852016-03-10T10:50:31.622-06:002016-03-10T10:50:31.622-06:00My point being; The only article, nikifaulk has an...My point being; The only article, nikifaulk has any connection to, is the march 9 article.It sure is a coincidence that it was posted at this article, one minute after the person making threats in this article and march 9 article,posted at 3:49.Looks like some one forgot to get back on the right article,after they made their threat.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-51701622748972615042016-03-10T10:46:08.598-06:002016-03-10T10:46:08.598-06:00Roger, could we get your comment on something I th...Roger, could we get your comment on something I think we're starting to see:<br /><br />http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2016/03/committee_hears_both_sides_of.html#incart_river_index<br /><br />A couple of names keep popping up in this and other contexts: Ken Johnson and Rich Wingo. You've no doubt heard the rumours and wondering when we will see something from you about it. Wingo has long-range ties to University of Alabama... What is Wingo's interest in "sugar"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-19151442148444573792016-03-10T10:11:37.501-06:002016-03-10T10:11:37.501-06:00I read the post at nickifaulk.com, @3:50. It was f...I read the post at nickifaulk.com, @3:50. It was fairly interesting, but the long-and-winding writing style made it hard to follow. I saw that Mr. Springer was involved, apparently as the plaintiff's attorney. Saw Doug Jones mentioned, and that's a familiar name.<br /><br />I assume you were trying to make a point, but I'm not sure what it is. Do you care to elaborate?legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-67885603813289470222016-03-10T10:05:31.788-06:002016-03-10T10:05:31.788-06:00You are several miles off target, @6:31. Someone h...You are several miles off target, @6:31. Someone has made bogus allegations against Carol and asked how they could speak to her. I told them how; she's not afraid to speak to them. First, she knows they are too big a coward to call. <br /><br />Sounds like you just aren't very bright, @6:31. Unfortunate for you.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-8840318488712893852016-03-10T06:31:21.855-06:002016-03-10T06:31:21.855-06:00I gave you our phone number above--(205) 381-5673....<b>I gave you our phone number above--(205) 381-5673. It's the same for both of us. She will be looking forward to your call.</b><br /><br />You're turning your wife out like a whore now Roger? Disgusting. Hypocrite.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-16299864191558005692016-03-09T18:40:32.099-06:002016-03-09T18:40:32.099-06:00Lets see. This post ran Feb 29. @3:49 alias @5:59 ...Lets see. This post ran Feb 29. @3:49 alias @5:59 makes a threat to you. One minute later @3.50 asks you to comment on a post that ran today (march 9).niki was talking about Springer. @3:50 is baiting you to slander Springer.The threat must be related to Springer. @3:49 and @3:50 are same person.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-52060582291552608162016-03-09T16:44:50.480-06:002016-03-09T16:44:50.480-06:00I gave you our phone number above--(205) 381-5673....I gave you our phone number above--(205) 381-5673. It's the same for both of us. She will be looking forward to your call.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-12220573166201520202016-03-09T15:50:39.942-06:002016-03-09T15:50:39.942-06:00Care to comment:
http://www.nickifaulk.com/2007/1...Care to comment:<br /><br />http://www.nickifaulk.com/2007/11/14/jury-duty-notes-and-my-thoughts-on-the-case/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-54479522050853237822016-03-09T15:49:50.788-06:002016-03-09T15:49:50.788-06:00Roger, @5:59 AM here. Happy to help.
How can I co...Roger, @5:59 AM here. Happy to help.<br /><br />How can I contact Carol? Did he t ie her right?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-56366064608149957652016-03-09T10:55:58.290-06:002016-03-09T10:55:58.290-06:00Why don't you contact me at rshuler3156@gmail....Why don't you contact me at rshuler3156@gmail.com and (205) 381-5673, and we'll discuss. Or you can discuss this "man in Jasper" with Carol directly.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-87305781332162688712016-03-09T05:59:10.541-06:002016-03-09T05:59:10.541-06:00Roger, you must be worried that your wife will suf...Roger, you must be worried that your wife will suffer further collateral damage as you continue your project. Any thought of getting her to safety for awhile? <br /><br />Maybe she could stay in Jasper with that man she used to fuck.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-82957935406827371842016-03-03T18:22:32.044-06:002016-03-03T18:22:32.044-06:00To @4:52: Surely you realize by now that Roger wil...To @4:52: Surely you realize by now that Roger will not accept free advice. I was picking the comments that advanced my agenda. Nothing personal against you.The clue part was to plant Baxley and Garrison in his mind. But the first clue is "The Foundry" is a family orientated organization which a woman would advocate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-84619653037975479692016-03-03T16:52:18.340-06:002016-03-03T16:52:18.340-06:00@7:53 - Sorry to break it to you, I am @3:47 and I...@7:53 - Sorry to break it to you, I am @3:47 and I'm not a lawyer nor have I been to law school. I also don't have a clue who @8:40 is and I don't care. Just out of curiosity, what clue are you looking for and which one do you think is the female? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-73150748442557514492016-03-03T11:41:42.882-06:002016-03-03T11:41:42.882-06:00I'm not the same person as @12:10. I was simpl...I'm not the same person as @12:10. I was simply stating a fact that one anonymous person (who hides their identity) is calling out another anonymous person. If you're so proud of your claim, why are you hiding your identity? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-47524864552147561512016-03-03T10:38:37.905-06:002016-03-03T10:38:37.905-06:00Nice try, @10:09, but you miss the point. I'm ...Nice try, @10:09, but you miss the point. I'm not attempting to offer anyone advice; you are. My point is that advice means nothing if you don't know the source. If you want LS, and his readers, to take your advice seriously, tells us who you are. Surely you have enough common sense to understand why that matters.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-18363383195159949382016-03-03T10:09:18.570-06:002016-03-03T10:09:18.570-06:00Funny @9:48. You "anonymously" reply to...Funny @9:48. You "anonymously" reply to someone posting anonymously and call them a fraud? Isn't that like the pot calling the kettle black? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-11286271488950928502016-03-03T09:48:31.325-06:002016-03-03T09:48:31.325-06:00I don't understand how @12:10 expects you to t...I don't understand how @12:10 expects you to take his advice seriously when he doesn't tell you who he is. That's like pulling the lever for a presidential candidate, and you don't know his name. Tells me this guy is a fraud.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-72103475647647138172016-03-03T09:32:20.086-06:002016-03-03T09:32:20.086-06:00Thanks for your input, @7:53. I suspect you are ri...Thanks for your input, @7:53. I suspect you are right on target. In fact, I probably get a lot of comments from people like that--someone trying to bait me, distract me, whatever.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-1075431256750589482016-03-03T07:53:47.506-06:002016-03-03T07:53:47.506-06:00Roger! @3:47 is not a dumb-ass. He is a cleaver at...Roger! @3:47 is not a dumb-ass. He is a cleaver attorney baiting you to say something to be used against you at a later time. @8:40 is his accomplice.I think one is female,but need one more clue. @6:28 baited him by calling him a dumb-ass.@3:47 exposed himself when he replied at @7.29 I am a bit of a smart-ass, and then said "I will rephrase the question." That sounds like a dumb-ass lawyer caught off gaurd.<br /> Shoot! I think I just contradicted myself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com