tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post693662802526708838..comments2024-03-12T21:13:06.850-05:00Comments on Legal Schnauzer: Was the Siegelman Jury on Drugs?legalschnauzerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-39737592685481482312008-03-21T11:20:00.000-05:002008-03-21T11:20:00.000-05:00The case is ugly and the background, as Horton tel...The case is ugly and the background, as Horton tells it, is quite rich with conflicts of interest. Many principals in the case had their axes to grind against the defendant.<BR/><BR/>At Bill's Big Diamond Blog, we're running a video interview series with Scott Horton about the case and the political background to it. Contributions to filling out the story are welcome.<BR/><BR/>See parts 1-3 up now at: http://billsrants.typepad.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-38272294154923061052008-03-18T20:25:00.000-05:002008-03-18T20:25:00.000-05:00The jury came back deadlocked twice before the jud...The jury came back deadlocked twice before the judge reminded them that he had a life time appointment and was willing to wait until they came to an agreement. In addition there appeared to be communication between a couple of fundamentalists, one was the foreman, about how to browbeat those voting not guilty into going along. They were not high on drugs, just high on the Jesus that hates the poor and loves republicans.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com