tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post5868590345601653583..comments2024-03-12T21:13:06.850-05:00Comments on Legal Schnauzer: AL Republican Rob Riley Resorts to Intimidation Campaign To Clean Up His Record For Run at Spencer Bachus' Seat legalschnauzerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comBlogger43125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-37975815718896054342013-10-08T08:39:07.581-05:002013-10-08T08:39:07.581-05:00If you do in fact read this blog regularly, 3:18, ...If you do in fact read this blog regularly, 3:18, you should know that I look up relevant law for myself--and I encourage my readers to do the same. I don't have to "trust" anyone to know what the law is. If you think lawful service is only about "notice," I would suggest you read the very lengthy Rule 4 ARCP to see that it is about much more than that. If I read something on the Web or find a document in my driveway or in the trash, I might have notice. I can even write about it here. It doesn't mean I've been served. If you believe otherwise, you aren't much of a lawyer.<br /><br />BTW, no one has said I'm running from this. But I expect the law to be followed, starting with service of process.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-81415205383301609022013-10-08T08:34:08.225-05:002013-10-08T08:34:08.225-05:00You don't have a clue what you are talking abo...You don't have a clue what you are talking about, 7:35. Why should any citizen expect a court to rule lawfully in a case where it can't even get it correct on simple service of process? If you think it's lawful for a deputy to serve court papers during a traffic stop, lawful or unlawful, you need to return to law school, or wherever you came from. I didn't appear for the "hearing" because I wasn't lawfully served--and anyone who reads Rule 4 ARCP knows that. Furthermore, even with proper service, I was not given lawful notice, which I will be showing in an upcoming post.legalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-90417398168339089452013-10-07T19:47:30.961-05:002013-10-07T19:47:30.961-05:00Renfroe Bob Riley's middle name.
Renfroe Cher...Renfroe Bob Riley's middle name.<br /><br />Renfroe Cherokee, too.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-28402917914209886392013-10-07T19:35:32.798-05:002013-10-07T19:35:32.798-05:00My two thoughts:
1) Although I think that LS is g...My two thoughts:<br /><br />1) Although I think that LS is generally way off base in his assertions about legal matters, and that he can be somewhat disingenuous in his posts, he is correct regarding the TRO/preliminary injunction. Prior restraints are only permitted in a few very narrow circumstances, and I do not believe this is one of them. That being said, however, does not mean that the judge or legal system is corrupt because...<br /><br />2) It is no one's job except for LS's to argue his case in court. There is an old saying that "bad facts make bad law." The situation here is somewhat analogous. America operates on an adversarial system. That means it is the job of the parties, not the court, to spar with each other. People can, and do, lose cases all the time that they "should" have won. They do it because they make the wrong legal arguments or fail to make the correct ones.<br /><br />LS is probably correct in guessing that someone at Riley's firm drafted the order. So what? It is the job of the defendant to show up and present his case. If LS had shown up and actually argued that prior restraints violate the First Amendment, he probably would have gotten the motion denied. As it was, however, LS was a no show. When parties don't show up, 99% of the time the judge will grant the motion sought without giving the merits of the motion a second thought. It does not mean that they are a legal "prostitute" (btw - if one is looking for a good way to get on the bad side of a judge, do what LS is doing). It means that in an adversarial system, the court is not going to take it upon themselves to make the argument that the absent party should have made...that is not their job (note that it is only in very rare circumstances where an injunction would be "wrong" per se - they are typically discretionary). That is not to say that the ruling here was correct, or that it would not be struck down on appeal. It is more in the way of: "What did LS expect when he decided not to show up?"<br /><br />LS has been properly served in this case (he seems to be asserting that his service is somehow invalidated or some sort of thing, but he has not, and cannot, offer authority to support that assertion). LS was noticed about this hearing (I would be interested to hear how the notice was "inadequate"). LS did not show up. Therefore LS lost. It is that simple. No more, no less. If LS wants to have the injunction lifted, he probably can...But to do so, he will have to make his own argument. No one is going to do it for him.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-35902944704807760592013-10-07T18:24:23.197-05:002013-10-07T18:24:23.197-05:00When the saying 'we are what we eat' gets ...When the saying 'we are what we eat' gets to be deeply discussed by the human population, the so called food is a grim reaper's reward at best.<br /><br />But the so called 'Justice' and other words said: 'Truth', 'Honesty', Integrity', and 'Trust', these are what supposedly the practitioners of our 'US Constitution Law' and the BILL OF RIGHTS, not this small backwards underhanded low down dirty filthy no good self righteousness.<br /><br />The sanctimonious seamy sleazy really think they're not seen.<br /><br />Russia's style is definitely here in the Alabama corrupt. What is the lineage trace, think that should be carefully researched.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-35537089852288498172013-10-07T15:18:58.994-05:002013-10-07T15:18:58.994-05:00I never comment on these blogs but felt compelled ...I never comment on these blogs but felt compelled on this subject. LS you really need to heed Ricco Pitts' advice. I have practiced law in this State for over 25 years and run a very successful, primarily Plaintiff's practice. I enjoy reading your blog daily. Please trust me on this....under the laws of the State of Alabama (and most other States)...You've been served. The fact that you're reciting, verbatim, language from the filings proves that you've been served. Service equals notice and you have more than notice. You're welcome to disagree with me, but you do so at your own peril. You can't hide behind your computer screen or keep yourself locked up in your house claiming you haven't been served therefore there is no case. Hire an attorney and fight this in court. If you have all of the proof of which you right that is an ABSOLUTE DEFENSE to libel and slander...PERIOD. If not, you're liable. This is the perfect opportunity to conduct full-out discovery, including Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions, Requests for Production of Documents, DEPOSITIONS, etc., etc. Don't run from this. Good Luck!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-91894326991099695232013-10-07T13:40:35.742-05:002013-10-07T13:40:35.742-05:00According to friends of Wallace, his last words ea...According to friends of Wallace, his last words early on Friday were “I am free. I am free.”<br /><br />"He completed that mission," longtime friend Parnell Herbert told the Times Picayune. "And he was able to see himself a free man. He passed away peacefully in his sleep."<br /><br />Notwithstanding this, supporters of Wallace say they will press on to ensure freedom for Woodfox and reform for the American prison system. <br /><br />GET IN TOUCH WITH 'SUPPORTERS OF WALLACE', ALL - SUPPORT LS BECAUSE THEY TRULY UNDERSTAND!<br /><br />xoPPAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-56523357885067114952013-10-07T13:03:28.031-05:002013-10-07T13:03:28.031-05:00Levin's anti-alcohol crusade proved to be exce...Levin's anti-alcohol crusade proved to be excellent preparation for his next cause, a campaign against Catholic political power, which he carried on in two papers, the Native American and The Daily Sun. Initially the main political issue was a 1843 public school ruling permitting Catholic children to be excused from Bible-reading class (because the Protestant King James Version was being used). Levin became the leader and chief spokesman for a start-up political movement calling itself the American Republican Party (later the Native American Party). Between May and July 1844 he gave speeches and led public demonstrations in Kensington and Southwark, leading to the looting and burning of several dozen houses, businesses and religious buildings. Levin and his colleague Samuel R. Kramer (publisher of the Native American) were arrested and fined for "exciting to riot and treason" in inciting locals to invade and burn several Catholic churches and a convent.[5]<br /><br />LS, do some research on this guy, he was the one who pretended to be this 'liberal' and sure enough he was smart, he got all the religious nuts in USA to fight against one another while he carefully constructed the gulag of what was and is owned now called zionist america.<br /><br />the degenerates are scared and dangerous, don't let 'em see you sweat, and get the Gov House Reform Elijah Cummings involvedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-87508742212196273612013-10-07T12:26:44.943-05:002013-10-07T12:26:44.943-05:00As an experienced prostitute, I must object to you...As an experienced prostitute, I must object to your comparison of those in my profession to a judge. That's really hitting below the belt, and I won't stand for it!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-89951519653215889592013-10-07T12:25:05.403-05:002013-10-07T12:25:05.403-05:00The most amazing thing about this to me is the jud...The most amazing thing about this to me is the judge's decision to seal the case file. That's nuts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-83155731767545682792013-10-07T12:15:13.068-05:002013-10-07T12:15:13.068-05:00I can't figure this one out, LS. Why didn'...I can't figure this one out, LS. Why didn't Rob Riley file his defamation claim back in January/February, when you first started writing about it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-52319213619779392632013-10-07T12:14:10.749-05:002013-10-07T12:14:10.749-05:00Memo to Rob Riley:
If you don't want a journa...Memo to Rob Riley:<br /><br />If you don't want a journalist to write about your sleazy activities, don't engage in sleazy activities.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-71750760348460720912013-10-07T11:41:00.922-05:002013-10-07T11:41:00.922-05:00USA "Judicial" is beyond desperate.
The...USA "Judicial" is beyond desperate.<br /><br />The journalism is actually just begun in the real time.<br /><br />So many poor Americans were destroyed during this time for being 'conspiracy nuts'.<br /><br />Nucking Futters the politicians and the entire tribe of what is considered the 'Legal'.<br /><br />As this gets worse for the people in the USA that are human filth violators of the trust, it gets a lot worse for those (LS) who are so fed up with the trash, that life and liberty and pursuit of real happiness is well worth the good god blessed fight.<br /><br />God Bless the Legal Schnauzer Blog and all the supporters for being in the light of our future.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-51959853531241689312013-10-07T11:15:59.336-05:002013-10-07T11:15:59.336-05:00I can't wait for all the ads touting Rob Riley...I can't wait for all the ads touting Rob Riley's "family values." We'd all better stock up on vomit bags now, before they sell out.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-40573000545284720042013-10-07T11:14:58.020-05:002013-10-07T11:14:58.020-05:00If Rob Riley is elected to Congress, you can bet h...If Rob Riley is elected to Congress, you can bet he eventually will give up the seat to run for governor, just like "Diddy" did it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-40384450153852608252013-10-07T10:34:06.727-05:002013-10-07T10:34:06.727-05:00If Rob Riley graduated from Yale Law, and he parti...If Rob Riley graduated from Yale Law, and he participates in a case like this . . . what on earth are they teaching at Yale?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-37428437450908017182013-10-07T10:30:28.112-05:002013-10-07T10:30:28.112-05:00You need to contact the ACLU about his case. It is...You need to contact the ACLU about his case. It is a blatant violation of your first amendment rights. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-78258407664840836012013-10-07T10:18:19.534-05:002013-10-07T10:18:19.534-05:00The way I read the section of the order quoted her...The way I read the section of the order quoted here, this judge is threatening to arrest any journalist who reports on this case.<br /><br />This is insanity, even by Alabama standards.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-28389940402604354582013-10-07T10:15:42.659-05:002013-10-07T10:15:42.659-05:00I think you nailed it, LS. Rob's main concern ...I think you nailed it, LS. Rob's main concern is to keep this legal case away from the prying eyes of his GOP primary competitors. Dems probably won't even put up a viable candidate, so Rob knows it's going to be all about the primary.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-5776146937374093492013-10-07T09:41:35.567-05:002013-10-07T09:41:35.567-05:00Liberty Duke is not Rob Riley's only mistress....Liberty Duke is not Rob Riley's only mistress. There is another one, and she lives in a state to the south of Alabama, one known for its sun and beaches.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-7658439751820999562013-10-07T09:40:41.046-05:002013-10-07T09:40:41.046-05:00presstitutes
Roger isn't a presstitute
He is...presstitutes<br /><br />Roger isn't a presstitute<br /><br />He is a real journalist,<br /><br />"... Journalism is not only being criminalized in America, but investigative reporting is actually treated liketerrorism.<br /><br />The government admits that journalists could be targeted with counter-terrorism laws (and here). For example, after Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Chris Hedges, journalist Naomi Wolf, Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg and others sued the government to enjoin the NDAA’s allowance of the indefinite detention of Americans – the judge asked the government attorneys 5 times whether journalists like Hedges could be indefinitely detained simply for interviewing and then writing about bad guys. The government refused to promise that journalists like Hedges won’t be thrown in a dungeon for the rest of their lives without any right to talk to a judge<br /><br />After the government’s spying on the Associated Press made it clear to everyone that the government is trying to put a chill journalism, the senior national-security correspondent for Newsweek tweeted:<br /><br /> Serious idea. Instead of calling it Obama’s war on whistleblowers, let’s just call it what it is: Obama’s war on journalism.<br /><br />http://www.globalresearch.ca/veteran-new-york-times-reporter-this-is-most-closed-control-freak-administration-ive-ever-covered/5353238<br /><br />Murphy Spirit Coalition surround the Alpha Dogs Roger and Carol and get'em<br /><br />Get in touch with senior national security correspondent, Chris Hedges, Et AlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-58030441266384171142013-10-07T09:38:27.498-05:002013-10-07T09:38:27.498-05:00Riley claims in court documents that Alabama Rule ...Riley claims in court documents that Alabama Rule of Civil Procedure 5.1(c) "allows courts of this state to order that case filings be made under seal to protect the privacy of parties."<br /><br />Here is URL to that rule, and you can see that's not exactly what it says:<br /><br />http://judicial.alabama.gov/library/rules/cv5_1.pdflegalschnauzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-81635759523656364292013-10-07T09:35:29.821-05:002013-10-07T09:35:29.821-05:00What makes Rob Riley think he is entitled to have ...What makes Rob Riley think he is entitled to have a case that he filed in a public court be decided in private?<br /><br />Did "Diddy" tell him that's the way it's done in "Allah--Buhm--ah"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-73751251007073988802013-10-07T09:32:24.656-05:002013-10-07T09:32:24.656-05:00Got to agree with Judge Neilson on one thing: Alab...Got to agree with Judge Neilson on one thing: Alabama is a backwater out of Stalinist Russia.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-60972953190877946042013-10-07T09:01:23.073-05:002013-10-07T09:01:23.073-05:00At least miss Liberty was never called a "glo...At least miss Liberty was never called a "glorified prostitute"!ttowntruthseekernoreply@blogger.com