tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post2737075266642376890..comments2024-03-12T21:13:06.850-05:00Comments on Legal Schnauzer: A Basketball Coach, Assault, and Legal Ethicslegalschnauzerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09619089628125964154noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-73743848916273016062008-12-24T22:05:00.000-06:002008-12-24T22:05:00.000-06:00my second comment: somebody is not telling the tr...my second comment: somebody is not telling the truth about the encounter. if Kennedy is telling the truth, those guys accused him of yelling racial insults and punching the cabbie. that is textbook definition of defamation. if kennedy is not telling the truth, then a counterclaim is in orderAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3669412675139526125.post-86328131753296223432008-12-24T22:01:00.000-06:002008-12-24T22:01:00.000-06:00nice analysis. neither the cabbie nor the valet b...nice analysis. neither the cabbie nor the valet backed away from numerous interviews about the situation. the cabbie did both radio and tv interviews. the valet did at least one t.v. interview. they clearly stepped outside simple reporting of a crime to the police. my guess is that the lawsuit may have been aimed, at least in part, to stop the flashbulbs. the lawyers are also claiming that the witness and the victim have put forward several different stories (or at least conflicting stories).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com