Leaderboard 728 X 90

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Nov. 14 Court Hearing in Legal Schnauzer First Amendment Case Results in "Final Order"

This is Carol, Roger's wife. The Nov. 14 "Permanent Injunction" hearing in the Legal Schnauzer first amendment case was carried out under murky circumstances and held at a secretive location which served to keep it from the disapproving eyes of a concerned public. However the telephone interview with Roger Shuler filled in many details of what transpired during this kangaroo court proceeding.

This bizarre hearing subsequently resulted in a "Final Order" that we received in the U.S. mail sometime over the weekend. Ironically, this "Final Order" proves that we could not have possibly been expected to be in attendance at the Petitions for Preliminary Injunctions as the hearing itself was also held on September 29, 2013. This was the exact same day as the bogus traffic stop where Officer DeHart testified under oath that our unlawful so-called service of the civil suit took place. This traffic stop was in the parking lot of the Shelby County Library on September 29, 2013, and yet the hearing for the Preliminary Injunction was also held on September 29, 2013 per this court's "final order" which states as follows:
"Just as it did at the September 29, 2013 hearing on the Petitions for Preliminary Injunction, the Court finds that Petitioners have demonstrated that the Respondents have published false, defamatory and libelous statements concerning Petitioners on Respondents' website, Legal Schnauzer."
The "final order" also grants the Petitioners exorbitant attorney's fees in the amounts of $24,425 for Riley and $9,450 for Duke. Pretty steep attorney's fees for a case that only lasted a grand total of six weeks!

The "final order" is shown below:



9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Making sure other people know

Go viral, go viral, go viral

CATE VS. OLDHAM 707 F. 2d 1176 11th U.S. CIRCUIT, ATLANTA

CRITICISM OF A GOVERNMENT ENTITY IS PRIVILEGED;

ONE REASON FOR SUCH STRINGENT PROTECTIONS OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS IS THE INTANGIBLE NATURE OF THE BENEFITS FLOWING FROM THE EXERCISE OF THEIR RIGHTS, AND THE FEAR THAT, IF THESE RIGHTS ARE NOT JEALOUSLY SAFEGUARDED, PERSONS WILL BE DETERRED, EVEN IF IMPERCEPTIBLY, FROM EXERCISING THOSE RIGHTS IN THE FUTURE."

"Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country." Publicly supporting Shu

Coyote Lane said...

Welcome to the New World ORDER/s.

The reality is, whatever the Federal Reserve System wants IT gets.

What else does the entity really have? Flesh trading is how the INSURANCE $ was calculated.

AIG in China was and is IT is said, about insuring the humans of the planet earth so when the death occurs, the ten million digits at the UN goes to the same ole same ole, the great families of the United Kingdom & Vatican.

http://www.kahudes.net/

FOLLOW THE MONEY Carol Schnauzer, write, Email, Call & do whatever you can to get in touch WITH KAREN HUDES' lawyer firm in real time.

Roger has exposed the CABAL at the tap root and Alabama was and is a deep pocket of REIGN OF TERROR "ROT" as the House of Rothschild moves in for the final kill.

KAREN HUDES ALL ALABAMIANS & get on with suing the Fed.

Steve said...

I think even Kafka would have a hard time getting his head around this!

Anonymous said...

Blog Someone New Each Day

Get National Support For Shuler

CORNELIUS VS. N.A.A.C.P. 473 U.S. 788 105 S. CT. 3439 87 L ED. ED. 2D. 567 (1985)

The existence of reasonable grounds for limiting access to a non-public forum WILL NOT SAVE a regulation that is, IN REALITY, A FACADE for view pointed-based discrimination.

EVEN REGULATION EXCLUDING ALL ADVOCACY GROUPS CANNOT STAND IF THE REGULATION IS, IN FACT, BASED ON THE DESIRE TO SUPPRESS A PARTICULAR POINT OF VIEW."

Wouldn't this type court ruling be equal to Shuler's court appearances w/o access to public; most obviously the unjustified guarding by numerous deputies while in body, leg, hand chains.

Why a secret court hearing? Who determined the cost listed in Order, who has access to the defendant's copies?

HALL VS. OCHS 817 F.2d 920 (1st Circuit 1987)

Holding one in jail unless he signed a waiver not to sue violated Fourth Amendment Rights and Liberty interest, even if there had been probable cause to arrest him."

By substituting "not to sue",; for, that he remove his blogs. May very well apply to Shuler.

Semper Fi

Anonymous said...

OUCH !!!

Anonymous said...

so does he get out of jail before qualifying for the 2014 elections?

Anonymous said...

Roger unfortunately is the GITMO detainee in our faces to terror our intellects.

We do not get to be heard, not the civilized of society.

That means what it says. The worst of criminal mafioso owns the USA.

How shocking?

No.

http://youtu.be/GxWjptWiwkw

Carol, bond/s? Insurance on Roger to the ?? The 'judges' all have bonds, what about demanding the law of providing a BOND for Roger, that you are now demanding full payment in return of your husband?

28 USC Section 1332, Claim and Delivery Bond in plain English.

Get information how to protect him while he is being held under the new laws that aren't Constitutional, this is made in our faces obvious.

Anonymous said...

ATTENTION ADVOCATES OF

FREEDOM[S] OF SPEECH

EXCERPT FROM THE JUDGE'S ORDER

"respondent Shuler replied by saying that the court had no jurisdiction over him< that he would not remove statements, that the court was "A JOKE" and that he was prepared to sit in jail "for 50 years".

Sent out the word, let it be known what is happening to law and justice in Alabama; and what this one man has prepared himself to do in hopes that FREEDOMS OF SPEECH, FREEDOMS OF THE PRESS NOT BE DENIED BECAUSE OF POLITICAL AND/OR FINANCIAL INFLUENCES.

LET IT BE KNOWN THROUGHOUT THAT THE FORMER 10 COMMANDMENTS JUDGE
NOW ALABAMA SUPREME COURT JUDGE, ROY MOORE, AFTER HAVING SUSPICIOUSLY ASSIGNED THIS SUPERNUMIARY JUDGE, WHO APPEARS TO LIVE ALMOST 100 MILES AWAY FROM THIS COURT, NOW MOORE DOESN'T SEEM TO HAVE ANY CONCERNS
FOR THIS RETIRED JUDGE'S JUDICIAL QUESTIONABLE COURTROOM PROTOCOL PROCEDURES GOING TO SUCH LENGTHS ALL TO HOLD AN INDIVIDUAL IN JAIL WITHOUT BOND UNDER THE GUISE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT.

JUDGE ROY MOORE, IF TRUE, ORIGINATED THIS JUDICIAL TRAVESTY, MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
THRU ATTEMPTING TO HOLD COURT IN SECRET, WHEN THOSE THAT DID COME WHERE TOLD WAS A CLOSED COURT.

Roger Shuler is being placed in the position that otherwise he could never have achieved on his own; by his rights and freedoms being denied and violated, it goes to confirm that every Alabamian on any given day, if one should say, one write something about high profiled individual that these same things could happen to them.

Shuler is paying the price for the rights and freedoms all love.

Semper Fi

Anonymous said...

Semper Fi, from Tennessee? Or somewhere in the other parts of the south?

Wherever from, the truth told is every Alabamian is indeed Roger, as Carol also knows.